| 00:06.17 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@gprs-internet-ff86ee00-194.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 00:06.30 | bsdfox_ | anyone got a recent mele-a1000_hwpack_2012.09.18.7z ? |
| 00:06.56 | bsdfox_ | I read that SATA is working lately but I can't find any to dl or get my cross compiler going |
| 00:14.30 | rz2k | hm http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/nightly/latest/ |
| 00:15.55 | rz2k | logs are saying that u-boot compilation dying with u-boot cant be compiled with hard-float abi |
| 00:34.13 | *** join/#arm-netbook metric (~i@dslb-178-000-166-169.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 00:44.25 | bsdfox_ | yeah I see one from 10/9 but all the posts I see about sata working are from the last 3 days |
| 01:08.48 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@37-136-208-141.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi) |
| 02:37.54 | ZaEarl | anyone try to build Chrome OS for A10? :) |
| 02:38.59 | RaYmAn | it'll probably run quite badly without properly accelerated X11 drivers |
| 02:39.32 | ZaEarl | I guess it's called Chromium OS now. |
| 02:39.59 | ZaEarl | Is it using an X11 stack? |
| 02:41.16 | RaYmAn | afaik, yes |
| 02:41.40 | RaYmAn | I spent some time trying to get it running on my transformer prime, but lost interest before it worked =P lol |
| 02:43.50 | ZaEarl | They recommend running it in VMs, so it can probably get by without much acceleration ok. |
| 02:44.40 | RaYmAn | I imagine it should be possible to get it booting with fbdev X11 driver |
| 02:44.41 | RaYmAn | as a start |
| 02:50.29 | ZaEarl | ok, the retail product is Google Chrome OS. The open source edition is Chromium OS. |
| 03:07.35 | *** join/#arm-netbook Liesanda_Ripoff (~ly@adsl-75-60-3-44.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net) |
| 03:13.12 | *** join/#arm-netbook tekzilla (~jon@hmbg-5f7735ee.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 03:18.54 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 04:09.28 | *** join/#arm-netbook ZaEarl_ (~malmrose@17.host-182-48-148.compassnet.co.nz) |
| 05:32.11 | *** join/#arm-netbook oliv3r (~oliver@7of9.schinagl.nl) |
| 05:39.52 | *** join/#arm-netbook ol1ver (~Thunderbi@7of9.schinagl.nl) |
| 05:43.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx (~Quarx@94.137.60.208) |
| 07:01.39 | *** join/#arm-netbook rellla (~Thunderbi@p4FE56003.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 07:18.21 | *** join/#arm-netbook gsilvis (~almostsix@50.12.163.241) |
| 07:30.01 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_x301 (~cat_x301@gprs-internet-ff88ee00-84.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 07:52.20 | *** join/#arm-netbook kaspter (~Instantbi@116.237.59.169) |
| 08:08.42 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@gprs-internet-ff88ee00-84.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 08:48.20 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@37-136-235-36.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi) |
| 08:48.45 | techn_ | how come our wiki guides points to some other persons repo instead of linux-sunxi |
| 08:49.02 | techn_ | http://linux-sunxi.org/Buildroot |
| 08:49.40 | techn_ | ah.. it's for cubieboard |
| 09:26.57 | mnemoc | those tutorials need serious cleanup |
| 09:27.15 | mnemoc | it's absurd them all include info about how to install a toolchain for example |
| 09:29.10 | mnemoc | techn_: i totally agree tutorials should all point to the main repos, not people of board specific forks |
| 09:29.23 | mnemoc | but also be properly splitted by topic |
| 09:29.32 | mnemoc | making buildroot is not cubieboard-only |
| 09:29.42 | mnemoc | using livesuit is not buildroot only |
| 09:30.40 | mnemoc | main problem with livesuit support at the momemnt is that we don't have a u-boot branch that hooks correctly between boot0/boot1 and our kernel |
| 09:31.18 | mnemoc | as we require (optional in 3.0, but default) the bootloader to pass proper machine type and mem info |
| 09:33.24 | mnemoc | i was wondering if we should fork (and maintain) the allwinner-tools repo |
| 09:33.53 | mnemoc | there is a patch for fixing the kernel driver livesuit for linux needs lingering around |
| 10:19.59 | lkcl | techn_: oh. that's funny. everyone complained when i insisted that people be a bit more rigorous about the rhombus tech wiki. |
| 10:20.06 | lkcl | hm |
| 10:22.25 | lkcl | they didn't like that, so moved to linux-suni instead. now you're saying that linux-sunxi is disorganised. funny that. |
| 10:25.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook Svet (~Sv@unaffiliated/sv) |
| 10:26.16 | mnemoc | lkcl: the reason was not organization, was scope. for RT the A10 is merely the SoC to use in the first EOMA card, linux-sunxi is 100% decided to these chips in particular |
| 10:27.55 | mnemoc | lkcl: and as you did with A10-specific info we are now suffering a flood of interest bound to the cubieboard |
| 10:28.45 | mnemoc | lkcl: having pages about the hackberry in RT's wiki is kind of.... weird |
| 10:30.14 | *** join/#arm-netbook mysteryname (~mysteryna@14-202-9-167.tpgi.com.au) |
| 10:30.15 | mnemoc | miniand can't have less in common with RT |
| 10:32.34 | mnemoc | lkcl: the split was intended to keep eoma's wiki/mailing list from been taken over by A10 fans |
| 10:34.29 | mnemoc | lkcl: btw, http://selfstarter.us/ |
| 10:35.18 | mnemoc | but it's ruby :| |
| 10:35.20 | mnemoc | yuck |
| 10:44.08 | mnemoc | lkcl: any realistic timeframe for us to be able to fund the mini engineering eoma68 board, and open hardware a10/imx6/exynos5 card? |
| 10:55.18 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_x301 (~cat_x301@gprs-internet-ffa1ee00-161.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 11:18.30 | *** join/#arm-netbook penguin42 (~dg@tu006.demon.co.uk) |
| 11:22.48 | *** join/#arm-netbook mnemoc (~amery@geeks.cl) |
| 11:34.47 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@gprs-internet-ff98ee00-132.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 11:36.00 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_x301 (~cat_x301@gprs-internet-ff98ee00-132.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 11:40.23 | *** join/#arm-netbook WarheadsSE (~WarheadsS@c-174-59-252-104.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 11:59.45 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 12:11.11 | *** join/#arm-netbook IEF (ief@shadowchild.nl) |
| 12:16.34 | *** join/#arm-netbook cat_n9 (~communi@37-219-225-10.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi) |