01:05.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook ibot (ibot@rikers.org) |
01:05.29 | *** topic/#arm-netbook is ARM netbook GNU/Linux hacking - logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23arm-netbook |
10:34.04 | mnemoc | fjp: hi, did you receive your bag from DX yet? |
10:34.36 | mnemoc | fjp: sorry, it was zecrazytux |
10:34.43 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: hi, did you receive your bag from DX yet? :-) |
10:40.25 | zecrazytux | hi |
10:40.43 | zecrazytux | I'll go to the post office this afternoon |
10:41.03 | zecrazytux | they tried to deliver it when I was sleeping, I guess |
10:41.09 | zecrazytux | :) |
10:43.47 | mnemoc | :D |
10:45.25 | zecrazytux | anyway, shipping takes more time than I thought. A bit less than one month ! |
10:46.28 | zecrazytux | for the first part, as they are splitting it out into three packages, and one is actually for an item that is unavailable |
10:57.39 | mnemoc | doh |
10:57.45 | fjp | zecrazytux: Did you get your compilation problem sorted out? Did not ring any bells. |
11:03.25 | zecrazytux | fjp: yup, I changed the name of an "ASM loop" I guess (newbie inside) |
11:03.57 | zecrazytux | in mtd/onenand/s3c-onenand.c iirc, there's an inline ASM code |
11:04.27 | zecrazytux | and a loop/target named "read_page", but this symbol is somewhat "already defined" |
11:04.34 | zecrazytux | I changed it to "1" |
11:04.44 | zecrazytux | and it compiled |
11:04.57 | fjp | Weird. Not needed here. |
11:05.16 | zecrazytux | maybe related to the build tools ? |
11:05.27 | fjp | No idea. |
11:05.30 | zecrazytux | asm / linker |
11:05.48 | zecrazytux | I'm using a crosstoolchain based on uclibc and gcc 4.3.4 |
11:05.57 | zecrazytux | built with buildroot |
11:07.43 | mnemoc | to take the chitech a part, what goes first, the screws from the bottom or the kb? |
11:10.27 | fjp | Doesn't really matter |
11:11.10 | mnemoc | any "advise" before voiding my warranty *cough* ? :) |
11:12.15 | fjp | I found it all relatively easy. |
11:44.17 | *** join/#arm-netbook lkcl (~lkcl@nat66.mia.three.co.uk) |
11:52.57 | mnemoc | having a bad time taking the kb out |
11:53.17 | mnemoc | and the screws from the bottom seem to not be enough to release the back |
11:53.34 | mnemoc | .oO( where is my frelling nail?? )o |
11:54.33 | mnemoc | .oO( or however that flat tool like the one using for playing guitar is named in english )o |
12:04.19 | fjp | mnemoc: It's been posted to the list early on. |
12:05.00 | fjp | You remove the kbd by lifting it over the 3 clips at the back. Just create a bit more room. |
12:05.35 | fjp | There are 3 more screws below the kbd that need removing before the top will come off |
12:06.04 | fjp | (You don't remove the back, but the top with the touchpad.) |
12:06.24 | mnemoc | ic |
12:08.51 | mnemoc | that was the spirit of my initial question :) |
12:09.24 | mnemoc | this *censored* is thight |
12:09.40 | mnemoc | tight* |
12:09.59 | fjp | The order in which you do it still doesn't matter: there are no screws holding the keyboard in place. |
12:10.41 | mnemoc | but without taking the kb out, you can't take the back out |
12:12.29 | mnemoc | finally... kb out |
12:14.03 | mnemoc | plectrum... funny name |
12:16.21 | mnemoc | fjp: do i have the take the display out too? |
12:17.10 | mnemoc | forget that |
12:17.12 | mnemoc | :) |
12:19.22 | fjp | If you want to install a webcam: yes ;-) |
12:20.34 | mnemoc | i'm more interested in a touch layer :) |
12:21.49 | mnemoc | GREAT! I got both "extras" :D |
12:22.05 | mnemoc | the 720p ic and the switch in the sodim |
12:22.06 | mnemoc | m |
12:23.44 | mnemoc | it's a pretty cute board indeed |
14:31.36 | mnemoc | did yours come with the actual sim card reader or only the hole in the case? |
14:43.56 | fjp | has a hole |
14:44.38 | fjp | http://alioth.debian.org/~fjp/log/posts/Debianizing_an_ARM-based_netbook.html |
15:01.59 | zecrazytux | mnemoc: got it |
15:02.18 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: how is it? |
15:03.06 | zecrazytux | damn great, regarding the price :) |
15:03.36 | zecrazytux | the netbook fits perfectly in it |
15:03.46 | mnemoc | advisable? |
15:04.07 | mnemoc | does it... protect? :) |
15:04.25 | zecrazytux | maybe a bit larger than the netbook itself |
15:04.48 | zecrazytux | it does protect as much as a "skin" can :) |
15:05.19 | zecrazytux | don't expect your notebook to survive to a big jump :p |
15:06.27 | zecrazytux | half the width of good quality skins such as my old crumpler one |
15:07.16 | zecrazytux | but that's something like /15 or /20 the price :p |
15:07.40 | mnemoc | hehe |
15:07.53 | zecrazytux | I'll take pictures if you some |
15:07.57 | zecrazytux | +want |
15:08.15 | mnemoc | sure |
15:12.31 | mnemoc | i want to buy one bag today, and yours seems to be a good option :) |
15:13.30 | zecrazytux | how much space does Debian takes on the flash ? I am thinking about running either debian grip (+mainstream then needed) or a custom rootfs based on busybox, uclibc and a few softwares I may need/want |
15:15.47 | mnemoc | grip = squeeze.... requires newer kernel |
15:16.56 | zecrazytux | hmm |
15:16.57 | zecrazytux | "Emdebian Grip 1.0 (lenny) released" |
15:17.29 | fjp | I have 513MB used for Lenny. Base system + X.Org + bare enlightenment + claws-mail. |
15:17.56 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: ah, cool :) |
15:18.14 | fjp | I've not made any real effort to reduce space. Only removed a few packages and deleted translations of man pages. |
15:18.29 | zecrazytux | hm, great |
15:18.52 | mnemoc | Grip is busybox based instead of coreutils and it's fat friends |
15:19.00 | mnemoc | that has to count for something |
15:19.23 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: i was sure grip was squeeze-based :) |
15:19.26 | fjp | really doesn't want the extra worry of an external repo... |
15:19.38 | zecrazytux | mnemoc: no |
15:19.45 | zecrazytux | mnemoc: crush is busybox-based |
15:19.53 | mnemoc | .oO |
15:19.59 | zecrazytux | mnemoc: grip is based on coreutils as well as Debian |
15:20.08 | mnemoc | now i'm puzzled |
15:20.19 | zecrazytux | :) |
15:20.55 | zecrazytux | crush won't be an option after a loooooong time: no armel support, only a few packages are available, etc |
15:20.58 | fjp | grip only really removes unwanted translations and reduces some dependencies. |
15:20.59 | mnemoc | i had the idea that Crush was a layer upon grip... |
15:21.08 | zecrazytux | nop |
15:21.29 | fjp | (or maybe crush; can't keep them separated) |
15:22.15 | zecrazytux | grip is about 25% smaller than a basic debian installation, but acts the same as Debian |
15:22.58 | zecrazytux | in fact, binaries are the same, only useless files are taken out of the packages |
15:23.12 | zecrazytux | that's what I understood, indeed |
15:23.57 | zecrazytux | crush binaries are crosscompiled, completely different packages from mainstream Debian ones |
15:25.53 | mnemoc | and i wanted to try emdebian in my gdium (mipsel)... damn :( |
15:26.15 | zecrazytux | dunno if mipsel is support |
15:26.20 | zecrazytux | ed |
15:26.48 | mnemoc | crush "Currently only available for ARM" |
15:26.58 | zecrazytux | what about grip ? |
15:28.21 | zecrazytux | I wanted to use buildroot, but it does not support package creation :(... a basic rootfs based on uclibc is easy to get ready, but I would like to be able to add packages easily (even if crosscompilation on another box is needed) |
15:28.30 | mnemoc | "arm, armel, i386, amd64, powerpc, mips, mipsel, source." |
15:28.39 | zecrazytux | I won't have much time to have a look at OE |
15:28.58 | mnemoc | i have used buildroot and OE at work, but i don't feel confortable with any |
15:29.08 | mnemoc | so i ended up having a custom made build kit |
15:29.13 | zecrazytux | :) |
15:29.28 | mnemoc | but i really wanted to switch to debian/busybox... |
15:35.31 | mnemoc | gosh... with all those mails i don't know where to start for making the installation (already moved the switch) |
15:38.20 | mnemoc | fjp: is it still needed to use qemu? |
15:47.39 | mnemoc | any idea what the ribbon connector at the left of the keyboard is for? |
15:48.14 | fjp | mnemoc: For what? |
15:49.40 | mnemoc | fjp: to install debian. the wiki reflects that method, and i wanted to know if it's obsolete or i should read it |
15:52.49 | mnemoc | there is way too many info in the ML for my stressed brain |
16:10.03 | fjp | mnemoc: Just look for my first "Debian Installer" mail. |
16:10.35 | fjp | qemu is no longer needed; you can just boot D-I directly |
16:10.57 | mnemoc | fjp: thanks |
16:12.02 | mnemoc | still curious about the 5-wire free connector on the back of the vga controller and the free ribbon connector at the left of the kb's |
16:12.31 | fjp | mnemoc: http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2010-March/000394.html |
16:13.32 | mnemoc | fjp: i had that exact same mail open in front of me, but still unread. thanks a lot for the pointer and the confirmation! :) |
16:15.58 | mnemoc | the amount of mails (and chaotic replies) in the ML make it quite hard to dive in |
16:18.53 | fjp | agrees with some of that; I've seen better list behavior |
16:20.26 | mnemoc | gmail is ugly^3 for long threads |
16:20.53 | fjp | What's gmail? |
16:20.58 | fjp | ;-) |
16:21.01 | mnemoc | =) |
16:47.37 | zecrazytux | well, I installed debian base |
16:48.22 | zecrazytux | use mutt, luke :) |
16:57.01 | zecrazytux | fjp: is your xorg.conf posted somewhere ? |
16:57.24 | fjp | Nope. |
16:57.41 | zecrazytux | curently xfbdev does not show up |
16:57.42 | fjp | supposes zecrazytux would like him to |
16:57.48 | zecrazytux | yes, please |
17:02.36 | zecrazytux | driver "fbdev" |
17:02.39 | zecrazytux | ok |
17:02.56 | zecrazytux | hmm, keyboard works |
17:03.02 | zecrazytux | but that's daaaaammmnnnn slooooow |
17:04.43 | zecrazytux | hm, some keys don't work |
17:10.29 | fjp | zecrazytux: sent to list |
17:34.13 | zecrazytux | thx |
17:38.35 | zecrazytux | don't you find X very slow ? |
17:46.41 | zecrazytux | s/bash/dash and mksh for the user: aaaaaaaaaaaaaah <3 :) |
17:56.25 | zecrazytux | hmm, no driver for wireless :( |
17:56.32 | zecrazytux | I need to flash the kernel, then |
18:09.43 | mnemoc | how long does it usually take since the G³ to the chinese text of loading the "firmware"? |
18:10.28 | fjp | ~3 seconds or so? |
18:10.53 | mnemoc | uhm |
18:11.19 | mnemoc | i was almost a minute holding :-\ |
18:11.30 | mnemoc | and it's actually still in the G³ |
18:11.48 | zecrazytux | same problem here wanting to flash the kernel |
18:12.16 | zecrazytux | 3 |
18:14.04 | zecrazytux | crap :( |
18:14.25 | zecrazytux | maybe the uboot file is needed |
18:15.05 | mnemoc | any trick to force a power-off pressing something? :( |
18:15.26 | zecrazytux | hold power button for long |
18:15.50 | mnemoc | over a minute holding it already |
18:15.54 | zecrazytux | oh |
18:15.57 | mnemoc | and still G³ |
18:16.01 | zecrazytux | reset on the back of the netbook |
18:16.10 | mnemoc | aha! thanks |
18:16.15 | mnemoc | i forgot that button |
18:16.27 | zecrazytux | damn, can't flash that fucking kernel |
18:16.41 | zecrazytux | or it takes ages |
18:16.49 | zecrazytux | but there nothing bout G3 on the screen |
18:18.06 | zecrazytux | hm |
18:18.13 | zecrazytux | red chinese text |
18:19.16 | fjp | So your SD card is not correct. |
18:19.47 | zecrazytux | pk it flashed this time. dunno why but it failed for a while |
18:20.23 | mnemoc | damn G³ logo |
18:21.01 | mnemoc | i can't <reset> either, yuck yuck |
18:22.02 | zecrazytux | WTF ?! I can't boot the kernel :( |
18:23.48 | zecrazytux | I may try to boot a kernel with initrd and dd the kernel to flash :/ |
18:24.09 | zecrazytux | ooooh |
18:24.13 | zecrazytux | I know |
18:24.17 | zecrazytux | well |
18:24.21 | zecrazytux | I have an idea |
18:24.53 | zecrazytux | the chitech kernel haven't conpiled in fonts, and i don't install any dm :p |
18:28.35 | mnemoc | wonders how long will it take for the battery to get drained while only showing the G³ |
18:29.22 | zecrazytux | did you click quite strongly on the reset button ? |
18:29.42 | fjp | Yes. You need to feel/hear a click. |
18:30.13 | mnemoc | thanks! :D |
18:30.20 | mnemoc | so now it's off |
18:30.57 | mnemoc | like when removing the kb, i was been "too gentle"... narf |
18:31.22 | fjp | zecrazytux: Yes. That's why I don't really consider the CT kernel an option. On a system with a display I want a console. |
18:32.34 | zecrazytux | fjp: yes, but on a netbook, I *want* a wireless connection |
18:32.37 | zecrazytux | :/ |
18:33.15 | zecrazytux | isn't there any free driver for that card ? |
18:33.44 | mnemoc | fb? or xorg? |
18:33.55 | fjp | Sure there is. Just not in 2.6.24. |
18:34.27 | fjp | It's very simple: we need more people working on the kernel support. |
18:35.05 | mnemoc | i will |
18:36.52 | zecrazytux | erf |
18:37.05 | zecrazytux | I have no knowledge |
18:39.08 | zecrazytux | hm, ok, rt2x00 |
18:39.44 | mnemoc | the 3rd edition of love's kernel development guide was rescheduled for june :( |
18:40.23 | mnemoc | 2nd. edition is great, much easier to digest than "uniderstanding the linux kernel" |
18:41.00 | mnemoc | 3rd. edition was scheduled for this week... but not anymore |
18:42.02 | zecrazytux | found in Linux Kernels: from 2.6.24 release still available on 2.6.33 release |
18:42.06 | zecrazytux | hmmm |
18:43.32 | fjp | We need RT2800PCI_SOC |
18:45.36 | fjp | Which was added in .32. |
18:45.45 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: http://www.amazon.com/Building-Embedded-Linux-Systems-Yaghmour/dp/0596529686 is a good buy too... buying love's linux 2nd while 3rd is to be relased in 2M doesn't make much sense |
18:47.36 | fjp | (At least, I think so) |
18:49.01 | zecrazytux | fjp: pci ? it is USB ! |
18:49.31 | zecrazytux | anyway I'm building rt2x00 |
18:49.39 | zecrazytux | for our 2.6.24.7 |
18:49.47 | zecrazytux | did you try already ? |
18:50.20 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: hey, don't get distracted! :) the goal is not to get wifi in .24, the goal is to get the chitech running .33 :) |
18:51.27 | zecrazytux | huhu |
18:51.46 | zecrazytux | I would like to be able to use my notebook, also :) |
18:52.28 | mnemoc | ^^ |
18:53.22 | fjp | zecrazytux: Ah, yes. Anyway, what we need is not available in .24. |
18:55.55 | fjp | rt2x00: Implement support for rt2800usb (added in 2.6.30) |
19:01.28 | mnemoc | fjp: D+I should boot fine from a 128MB SD/fat16 card, right? |
19:01.37 | lkcl | mnemoc: yep |
19:02.20 | mnemoc | lkcl: thanks |
19:02.35 | lkcl | i have the GPIO startup sequence for powering on the PCI-e slot. |
19:02.56 | fjp | is not 100% sure about fat16 |
19:03.02 | fjp | Try VFAT |
19:03.49 | fjp | lkcl: I'm not sure about those mmc changes. I don't see how those could influence the IRQ handling. |
19:03.55 | fjp | Will give them a try though. |
19:04.26 | zecrazytux | mine is fat16 |
19:04.51 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: you can't boot either |
19:05.02 | lkcl | yehh, i'm just beginning at the beginning |
19:05.03 | zecrazytux | I could |
19:06.58 | mnemoc | zecrazytux: fat16, 1 partition, 3 files from http://arm-netbook.alioth.debian.org/pub/CT-PC89E/debian-installer/ ? |
19:07.22 | zecrazytux | yes |
19:08.21 | zecrazytux | last time i said i couldnt boot, that was due to the flashed chitech kernel that don't display anything but the g3 logo |
19:08.42 | zecrazytux | it somewhat booted but I did not see anything :) |
19:20.41 | mnemoc | :) |
19:30.07 | fjp | <PROTECTED> |
20:01.49 | fjp | lkcl: Just verified that the interrupt really comes in on the IRQ assigned to mmc0. |
20:01.55 | lkcl | ack |
20:03.04 | mnemoc | any idea why i can get stuck at the G³ when trying to boot the D-I (vfat, 128MB SD, 3 files from your dir) |
20:04.17 | fjp | Nope. From my experience you should get either a red or blue Chinese test with the firmware boot procedure. |
20:04.35 | mnemoc | uhm... |
20:05.08 | fjp | u-boot may be having problems reading the SD... |
20:05.38 | fjp | It's been working 100% here. |
20:07.11 | mnemoc | ok, i'll try to find another not-SDHC card |
20:07.33 | fjp | What is the total capacity of the card? |
20:08.53 | mnemoc | 128MB |
20:09.40 | mnemoc | and badblocks didn't find any problem on it |
20:10.36 | mnemoc | i think i have a 4GB SD-only card for the camcorder somewhere |
20:24.20 | mnemoc | damn card, it's not even useful to flash a firmware |
20:24.28 | mnemoc | 2G card worked immediately |
20:37.49 | zecrazytux | fjp: did you try to boot a recent kernel already ? |
20:40.06 | fjp | no |
20:47.08 | fjp | may have found the SD card solution... |
20:52.44 | fjp | Yihaa! |
20:52.48 | fjp | lkcl: Solved! |
20:53.33 | mnemoc | universal recipe for booting from the SD? |
20:54.32 | fjp | Nope. The ejecting external SD card fucks with mmc0 problem |
20:55.36 | mnemoc | reading the thread |
21:01.11 | zecrazytux | http://www.handlewithlinux.com/bphone-linux-phone-rotate-screen |
21:01.13 | zecrazytux | wow |
21:01.19 | zecrazytux | expensive, but amazing |
21:08.57 | lkcl | fjp: yaaay |
21:08.59 | lkcl | excellen |
21:10.20 | fjp | Not 100% yet. Seem to have lost mmc0 now. But eject is seen on right device. |
21:11.24 | lkcl | zecrazytux: yes these things usually are. |
21:11.34 | lkcl | hehe |
21:12.56 | lkcl | it's very easy to do expensive. |
21:13.13 | lkcl | zecrazytux: you sent an email to arm_netbooks a couple days ago |
21:13.19 | lkcl | i seem to have missed it but meant to reply |
21:15.00 | fjp | lkcl: Have a look at the mmc related changes here: http://git.debian.org/?p=arm-netbook/arm-netbook.git;a=blobdiff;f=arch/arm/mach-s3c6410/mach-smdk6410.c;h=74dadd1b6f75d776e1c1e3de066d1afb253201a6;hp=ec86f3e21466b85bc2ee3ae0076371ab2404db41;hb=00f370ce61f903ba8697709d58dc459fd65579f5;hpb=9b253055c73de146ed220dc94700f89a1e93c1b0 |
21:15.04 | lkcl | acp |
21:15.06 | lkcl | ack |
21:15.09 | fjp | Some of those are the key. |
21:15.27 | zecrazytux | yesterday, iirc, about hackable-devices project to promote the idea ? |
21:19.23 | lkcl | zecrazytux: yep |
21:19.33 | lkcl | fjp: you got some keys working as well?? |
21:19.36 | lkcl | :) |
21:19.47 | fjp | what keys? |
21:20.11 | lkcl | hhmid_buttons etc. |
21:20.19 | mnemoc | the mappings |
21:20.47 | fjp | Damn. Where is mmc0... |
21:20.56 | lkcl | yes. ok. rright. i see things like + gpio_set_pin(S3C_GPG6, S3C_GPG6_MMC_CD0); |
21:21.01 | lkcl | which is probably it |
21:21.16 | fjp | Yep. And the added #if 0 s |
21:22.30 | mnemoc | .oO( why in the mach-smdk6410 file? )o |
21:24.02 | fjp | That's not where I'm editing. |
21:24.17 | fjp | That's just what we used as our base |
21:24.50 | mnemoc | i was sure i had see some pastes from you suing march-ctpc89e |
21:25.06 | mnemoc | yuck, typos |
21:27.43 | fjp | lkcl: I can fix mmc1, but lose mmc0... |
21:27.46 | fjp | help! |
21:27.49 | lkcl | ahh :) |
21:29.04 | lkcl | gimme 1sec... *thinks*... writing a message now, commit with working using mmc0 then branch, then patches to do mmc1-but-no-mmc0 i take a look |
21:33.38 | fjp | Hmm. Interesting. I now have a state where removing card 1 results in messages that mmc0 is removed with the internal card ID. |
21:34.10 | fjp | Ah, no. That's what we had all along. |
21:35.47 | lkcl | fjp: i take a quick look at what ben was referring to, the "permanently inserted" stuff |
21:35.52 | lkcl | then i go sleep, it's late for me |
21:35.56 | zecrazytux | ethernet is unstable with "our" kernel |
21:38.31 | lkcl | hmmm, that was CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME, not same thing |
21:39.18 | lkcl | zecrazytux: the capacitors are not according to spec, it makes the ethernet unreliable, and naijing hacked the dm9000 about, adding extra delays and resets, to cope. |
21:39.36 | zecrazytux | fuckages... |
21:39.50 | lkcl | sometimes they do initialise or reset _twice_ |
21:40.03 | lkcl | the first time drains the capacitors but gets things half way there. |
21:40.14 | lkcl | inside the chip |
21:40.25 | zecrazytux | i've been able to use it for one hour or so but now i can't make it work again |
21:40.27 | lkcl | then the second time it works! |
21:40.30 | lkcl | ahh. |
21:40.46 | lkcl | i saw that happen on chitech as well - it's not just us. |
21:41.05 | lkcl | except you are lucky: for me it was any time the ethernet was disconnected, that was it: reboot time. |
21:41.44 | zecrazytux | grmbl |
21:42.21 | zecrazytux | hopes the wireless won't be fucked up that way as well |
21:43.39 | fjp | lkcl: I think you'll have to check what's done in the disassembly. |
21:44.01 | fjp | I've tried various combies, but can't find a working one. |
21:44.06 | fjp | -> bed |
21:44.41 | lkcl | fjp: yes. they have two versions of hsmmc_set_gpio |
21:44.51 | lkcl | one called s3c_hsmmc0_set_ios |
21:44.57 | lkcl | another called s3c_hsmmc1_set_ios |
21:44.58 | lkcl | whoops |
21:45.41 | zecrazytux | ... up 100, down, up 100, down, up 10 ! |
21:46.25 | zecrazytux | and no packets... |
21:46.31 | zecrazytux | (after a reboot) |
21:47.23 | fjp | lkcl: Well, at least we have it located now. |
21:53.01 | fjp | Hmm. That means they must have hacked drivers/mmc/host/s3c-hsmmc.c too... |
21:53.23 | fjp | That is where s3c_hsmmc_set_ios is defined. |
22:02.03 | lkcl | yes. |
22:02.36 | lkcl | the s3c_hsmmc0_set_ios is a complete fuck-up. direct access to registers (again), bypassing gpio_set_pin etc. |
22:03.11 | lkcl | *S3C_GPIO+0xE0 &= ~0xf000000; *S3C_GPIO+0xE0 |= 0x3222222 |
22:03.14 | lkcl | that sort of thing |
22:03.27 | fjp | I think they must somehow force card detection for mmc0 |
22:03.29 | lkcl | but s3c_hsmmc1_set_ios looks relatively unscathed |
22:04.01 | fjp | While avoiding linking it to the interrupt. |
22:04.38 | lkcl | they're definitely doing S3C_GPG6 -> S3C_GPG6_MMC-CD0 |
22:04.59 | lkcl | so in case 1: they're doing |
22:05.35 | lkcl | gpio_set_pin(S3C_GPH0, S3C_GPH0_MMC_CLK1); |
22:05.55 | lkcl | gpio_set_pin(S3C_GPH1, S3C_GPH1_MMC_CMD1); |
22:06.11 | lkcl | pullups to zero on both |
22:06.41 | lkcl | gpio_set_pin(S3C_GPG6, S3C_GPG6_MMC_CD0); |
22:07.42 | lkcl | gpio_pullup(S3C_GPG6, 2); |
22:09.57 | lkcl | then... waderfuk? s3c_gpio_cfgpin and pullup, not set_pin and pullup? beh?? |
22:10.39 | lkcl | ok - i leave it, look at it tomorrow. |
22:10.43 | fjp | Ack |
22:33.42 | lkcl | night folks. 3g off for the day. |