| 00:26.05 | *** join/#wowuidev Andols (~yaaic@217-209-12-6-no170.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 00:29.13 | *** join/#wowuidev Andols (~yaaic@217-209-12-6-no170.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 00:31.23 | *** join/#wowuidev mischanix (sid180704@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dphvgpaesxpioeel) |
| 01:16.06 | Gnarfoz | I don't think he follows the brute force approach of previous addons that just used the in-game API to try all possible combinations |
| 01:19.00 | Gnarfoz | foxlit: great update, btw. if anything, showing the mission levels/labels has made it more obvious how little they seem to mean: I just sent out two companions (17 and 18) and three troops on an level 48 elite mission and the cursed adventurer guide suggests it will be successful. (it is cursed, after all, but, yeah) |
| 01:19.16 | Gnarfoz | (troops are level 26) |
| 01:22.44 | Gnarfoz | it's a campaign mission, maybe those are intentionally easier |
| 02:22.02 | *** join/#wowuidev gisitis (~greedom@2001:16b8:2ee4:8000:aaac:8e1a:b23d:d7c0) |
| 02:54.20 | znf | <Gnarfoz> it's a campaign mission, maybe those are intentionally easier |
| 02:54.21 | znf | easy my ass |
| 02:54.29 | znf | I can't complete one of them in any possible damn way I tried |
| 02:54.57 | znf | every time I get that one, I just have to wait for it to expire and get a new one |
| 02:57.00 | znf | oh, the "remaining enemy health" is great |
| 03:13.01 | *** join/#wowuidev LexSfX (~lexlexlex@216-180-68-238.dyn.novuscom.net) |
| 03:29.34 | *** join/#wowuidev Andols (~yaaic@2a00:801:3f2:134f:8698:fcdd:d758:b9f3) |
| 03:29.51 | *** join/#wowuidev Andols2 (~yaaic@217-209-12-6-no170.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 04:04.33 | *** part/#wowuidev Seerah (~umsin@2600:1700:aac0:82e0:d10b:6f9e:aad0:3996) |
| 04:55.12 | *** join/#wowuidev Thaodan (~Thaodan@thaodan.de) |
| 06:21.44 | *** join/#wowuidev MooreaTv (~MooreaTV@unaffiliated/mooreatv) |
| 07:30.14 | *** join/#wowuidev Yuyuli (~Yuyuli@85-127-144-177.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at) |
| 08:01.29 | *** join/#wowuidev Yuyuli_ (~Yuyuli@85-127-144-177.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at) |
| 08:04.24 | *** join/#wowuidev Yuyuli (~Yuyuli@85-127-144-177.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at) |
| 09:12.20 | *** join/#wowuidev MooreaTv (~MooreaTV@unaffiliated/mooreatv) |
| 10:43.26 | *** join/#wowuidev brykrys (~brykrys@WoWUIDev/Norganna/Dev/Brykrys) |
| 11:37.48 | *** join/#wowuidev greedom (~greedom@2001:16b8:2ee4:8000:aaac:8e1a:b23d:d7c0) |
| 13:04.37 | Gnarfoz | yeah, the enemy health/companion health thing is very nice. no more dead companions for no reason :D |
| 13:10.56 | *** join/#wowuidev Breen (~Breen@80.175.117.105) |
| 14:48.40 | *** join/#wowuidev pompy (~Mike@2601:87:4101:92f0:61dc:9c6c:9bba:8f85) |
| 14:53.00 | *** join/#wowuidev Treeston (~stolenleg@unaffiliated/stolenlegacy) |
| 14:55.29 | znf | https://i.imgur.com/i8ihteW.png |
| 14:55.30 | znf | :-/ |
| 15:40.46 | znf | So every time I log on, my calendar blinks, saying that I have a pending invite |
| 15:40.52 | znf | but I checked everywhere and there's none |
| 15:41.20 | znf | How the hell do I make it show where it is? |
| 15:42.08 | *** join/#wowuidev Meorawr (~Meorawr@cpc157781-rdng31-2-0-cust996.15-3.cable.virginm.net) |
| 15:53.02 | *** join/#wowuidev Industrial (~tom@188.206.103.18) |
| 16:00.23 | Industrial | Hi. Question: I'm noticing that my settings for nameplates are resetting every time I join/leave an instance. Is there a way that I can enforce these with code? Which settings are affected by pressing the nameplates keybind? |
| 17:15.56 | *** join/#wowuidev mitch0 (~mitch@92-249-212-70.pool.digikabel.hu) |
| 17:20.24 | *** join/#wowuidev MiRai (~MiRai@unaffiliated/mirai) |
| 18:45.50 | *** join/#wowuidev Gethe (~Gethe@2603-8081-2540-4606-25d1-e496-f25a-382c.res6.spectrum.com) |
| 19:12.12 | *** join/#wowuidev Seerah (~umsin@2600:1700:aac0:82e0:282e:d2c5:c8f8:ef4a) |
| 19:12.12 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Seerah] by ChanServ |
| 19:56.18 | *** join/#wowuidev Ammako (~Ammako@gateway/tor-sasl/ammako) |
| 20:05.39 | *** join/#wowuidev Kesava (~Kesava@unaffiliated/sliker) |
| 20:41.39 | *** join/#wowuidev Ammako (~Ammako@gateway/tor-sasl/ammako) |
| 21:14.02 | Industrial | hmm. `myAddon.db:RegisterNamespace(moduleName, moduleDefaults).profile.X.Y = 'foo'` |
| 21:14.13 | Industrial | When I run this where moduleDefaults.X.Y = 'bar' |
| 21:14.26 | Industrial | and reload the UI, the value is 'bar' and not foo :S am I doing it wrong? |
| 21:30.27 | Industrial | nvm |
| 21:46.04 | znf | well this is a new one https://pastie.dev/UkZsPc.lua |
| 21:55.17 | foxlit | https://hastebin.com/izuvekubal.lua << so I have this problem -- write a comparison function that agrees with the ordering of the tuples in the provided data. |
| 22:03.07 | foxlit | (the incorrect fisher-yates shuffle is not significant) |
| 22:13.23 | Maldivia | foxlit: ehh, are those sorted ? |
| 22:14.54 | Elmoe | Asked another way, is the set of tuples in a linear order? |
| 22:16.19 | foxlit | Let's assume "yes". |
| 22:18.08 | foxlit | (the code snippet at the bottom checks that sorting using the comparison function recovers the original tuple sequence after it has been shuffled) |
| 22:22.48 | *** join/#wowuidev A-KO|pc (A-KO@136.52.91.152) |
| 22:23.30 | foxlit | return 0 > ( (a[1] < 5 and b[1] >= 5 and -1000 or 0) + (b[1] < 5 and a[1] >= 5 and 1000 or 0) + (a[2] > b[2] and -100 or 0) + (b[2] > a[2] and 100 or 0) + (a[1] < b[1] and -10 or 0) + (b[1] < a[1] and 10 or 0) ) -- is sort of close |
| 22:26.08 | Elmoe | If cases is a linearly ordered set of the tuples, then can you simply take an arbitrary tuple and hash it consistently to a key which maps to the position in the linear set and then just do a basic comparison? |
| 22:26.58 | Elmoe | Imagine for a second that you've simplified this to not be a linear set of tuples but just a linear set of strings |
| 22:27.15 | Elmoe | the position in the ordered set then becomes a simple comparison during the sort |
| 22:27.55 | foxlit | your comparison function should not access any information beyond its two arguments. |
| 22:28.19 | Elmoe | so cases is not a complete grammar then in that sense |
| 22:28.30 | Elmoe | you can only do the pairwise comparison between a and b |
| 22:28.46 | foxlit | (otherwise, the much simpler solution is "well, cases is right there, why don't you just scan it for either a and b and return based on whichever comes first?") |
| 22:29.16 | Elmoe | well yes thats what i was describing but avoiding the expensive scan each time :) |
| 22:31.21 | foxlit | but yes, cases isn't the full set of possible inputs, so even encoding it in its entirety within the comparison function wouldn't be a useful solution. |
| 22:31.51 | Elmoe | got it |
| 22:32.10 | Maldivia | foxlit: what do the various numbers mean?= |
| 22:35.19 | Elmoe | I'm a bit stumped as you don't actually know the pairwise orders in totality |
| 22:35.37 | Elmoe | is sorting the right solution to your problem or should you be building a regression given the known data |
| 22:36.47 | Maldivia | I don't think a comparison function exists for this -- I think you have a different kind of sorting on your hands |
| 22:38.55 | foxlit | The values in the tuples represent various properties of an object; I suspect an array of objects is being sorted according to those values. |
| 22:39.42 | foxlit | The tuple-lists are the observed object orderings. |
| 22:40.46 | *** join/#wowuidev Gethe_ (~Gethe@2603-8081-2540-4606-25d1-e496-f25a-382c.res6.spectrum.com) |
| 22:42.47 | *** join/#wowuidev phyber_ (phyber@unaffiliated/phyber) |
| 22:42.51 | *** join/#wowuidev Talyrius (uid175475@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-obqnsgbayjgcusyd) |
| 22:43.04 | *** join/#wowuidev pompy (~Mike@2601:87:4101:92f0:61dc:9c6c:9bba:8f85) |
| 22:43.33 | *** join/#wowuidev Seerah (~umsin@2600:1700:aac0:82e0:282e:d2c5:c8f8:ef4a) |
| 22:43.34 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Seerah] by ChanServ |
| 22:45.01 | *** join/#wowuidev sylvanaar (sid18093@pdpc/supporter/active/sylvanaar) |
| 22:50.22 | Maldivia | foxlit: have you tried creating a complete sorting order for all entries, and see if that makes things easier? |
| 22:50.28 | foxlit | filtering out the fluff, I mostly have trouble with these sequences: https://hastebin.com/xuteduvahe.yaml |
| 22:51.05 | foxlit | where e.g. (6 0 1 2 3) should appear before (5 0 2 2 7) |
| 22:55.13 | foxlit | Maldivia: I can't generate comparison results, and can instead only look at examples of orderings. |
| 22:56.06 | Maldivia | foxlit: I just did a quick check, and according to your pasted data, all the tuples have the same pair-wise ordering |
| 22:56.35 | foxlit | so at least it's not obviously inconsistent? |
| 22:57.10 | Maldivia | ie, there are no case where {a,b,c,d,e} is before {A,B,C,D,E} in one case, and {A,B,C,D,E} is before {a,b,c,d,e} in another |
| 22:57.56 | Maldivia | hmm, let me create a graph using this and then do a topological sort to get a sort of absolute ordering |
