| 00:00.48 | Mr_Rabies | really hope they fix the druid macro form problem in WoD |
| 00:01.10 | foxlit | there's a druid macro form problem? |
| 00:01.20 | Mr_Rabies | er druid from macro problem |
| 00:01.23 | Mr_Rabies | form |
| 00:01.28 | Mr_Rabies | i can't into keyboard |
| 00:01.29 | foxlit | … which is… :) |
| 00:01.40 | Mr_Rabies | the stance number can change depending on spec/level/etc |
| 00:01.48 | Mr_Rabies | for moonkin/tree form/flight form |
| 00:02.08 | Mr_Rabies | it seems they might be trying to clean it up by making travel form a single button but who knows if it'll work right |
| 00:02.40 | Mr_Rabies | travel form button should let you have seal form, stag/cheetah form, flight/swift flight form on one button |
| 00:03.32 | foxlit | but that's already basically one macro. |
| 00:04.45 | Mr_Rabies | last i remember, you'll have to use a different macro for that depending on your spec |
| 00:05.19 | Mr_Rabies | if you're feral or guardian you need one macro, if you're resto or balance you'll need another |
| 00:05.38 | foxlit | er, it's literally /cast [flyable,nocombat] Flight Form; [swimming] Aquatic Form; Travel Form |
| 00:06.07 | Mr_Rabies | what if you want to use a conditional based on the form you're currently in? |
| 00:06.16 | foxlit | why would you want that? |
| 00:06.49 | Mr_Rabies | dunno, i've had a reason to do it before, but i can't remember why |
| 00:07.04 | Mr_Rabies | i just use gogomount now to handle my traveling stuff |
| 00:07.40 | Mr_Rabies | oh, i guess at one point you couldn't mount from moonkin or tree form or something, i forget |
| 00:07.47 | Mr_Rabies | i can't really rememebr why i needed it |
| 00:08.03 | Mr_Rabies | but moonkin form isn't always, for example: stance:4 or whatever |
| 00:08.17 | Mr_Rabies | that's the problem i'm talking about |
| 00:09.26 | foxlit | [stance:4] isn't always moonkin form, but moonkin form is always [stance:4]. |
| 00:09.58 | foxlit | or at least that's how it should be at max level, anyway. |
| 00:10.45 | Mr_Rabies | i can't remember at all exactly what causes it but last time i checked the stance number can vary, even at max level |
| 00:10.58 | Mr_Rabies | i dunno, i'm feral so it doesn't really bother me personally |
| 00:11.25 | Mr_Rabies | maybe swift flight form is always the last stance? i can't remember |
| 00:11.44 | Mr_Rabies | eh either way i hope the change to the travel form stuff fixes it |
| 00:12.00 | Mr_Rabies | so seal form, flight form, and stag form are all stance:3 for example |
| 00:14.51 | foxlit | I could actually fix that on live realms, but I'm still unconvinced it's an actual problem caused by the travel forms. |
| 00:15.31 | foxlit | maybe symbolics would make more sense anyway: [form:b/c/a/f/m/t] |
| 00:22.20 | Jamash | man factory work sucks |
| 00:23.58 | Jamash | I signed up for a temp agency so I'd get a terrible job, and thus incentivize myself to apply for non-terrible jobs |
| 00:24.02 | Jamash | it has worked |
| 00:38.07 | TC-Work | " <user> logged out without closing Firefox, so Firefox automatically when he logged in." >.< |
| 00:39.02 | Mr_Rabies | they accidentally a word |
| 00:47.34 | *** join/#wowuidev alestane (~nevin@c-50-177-4-236.hsd1.nh.comcast.net) |
| 00:47.34 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+v alestane] by ChanServ |
| 00:52.35 | plaw | christ the aussie PM is terribad. he can't even get out soccer captain's name right in a YT address to the nation... then after the inevitable ridicule starts up, deletes the video |
| 00:58.57 | TC-Work | I am amused that the Titan Black box is ~1/3 the size of the 780 Ti box. |
| 00:58.57 | *** join/#wowuidev Iriel (~Iriel@173-8-135-209-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 00:58.57 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Iriel] by ChanServ |
| 01:22.34 | Jamash | I am amused that someone would pay $1000 for a video card |
| 01:24.52 | Stanzilla | why? |
| 01:25.06 | Stanzilla | people pay more for other hobbies |
| 01:37.53 | TC-Work | My work just bought 5 of them and 15 780 Ti's |
| 01:38.07 | TC-Work | And I really really want to do a 4x SLI. |
| 01:51.02 | Stanzilla | TC-Work: what does your work do |
| 01:51.17 | TC-Work | Stanzilla: VFX |
| 01:51.47 | Stanzilla | neat |
| 01:55.15 | *** join/#wowuidev pompy1 (~Mike@c-50-166-85-212.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 01:57.21 | TC-Work | In this case cards like that are only used for making commercials for games. Otherwise we use Quadro class cards. |
| 02:15.23 | *** join/#wowuidev Seerah (~RyanNL@adsl-98-66-2-156.mem.bellsouth.net) |
| 02:15.23 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Seerah] by ChanServ |
| 02:26.45 | *** join/#wowuidev Kodiack (~Colto_000@121-73-86-207.cable.telstraclear.net) |
| 02:48.46 | *** join/#wowuidev ZorbaBeta (tocohl@maximilian.pavlovian.net) |
| 02:48.51 | *** join/#wowuidev Diesal_ (~quassel@110-174-123-122.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 03:09.06 | *** join/#wowuidev ZorbaGama (tocohl@maximilian.pavlovian.net) |
| 03:13.44 | ccox | Jamash - also, if you do high end 3D (CAD, simulation, and some previz for hollywood), then the higher end cards can save serious time (and thus money) |
| 03:14.29 | ccox | Jamash: oh, and some simulation/computation tasks that can use the GPU instead of a supercomputing cluster also use those cards |
| 03:16.02 | *** join/#wowuidev KarlKFI (KarlKFI@2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:14a2) |
| 03:16.29 | *** join/#wowuidev Kaylin (~Kaylin@c-71-227-163-150.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 03:17.34 | ccox | The high end cards also do well in video/film editing - where you need a lot of data on the card (footage, LUTs, mattes, etc.) and need high throughput (4k, 8k streams, or worse). |
| 03:40.42 | Thunder_Child | ccox: Except that if you are doing it professionally, you want Quadro cards. |
| 03:41.07 | Thunder_Child | The only one that actually prefers a GeForce is Mari. |
| 03:41.21 | Thunder_Child | Which is a PitA |
| 03:44.51 | airtonix | Thunder_Child: your work does vfx, and you can't afford to hire a django specialist? |
| 03:45.19 | airtonix | ಠ_ಠ |
| 04:06.10 | *** join/#wowuidev Esamynn|Away (~chatzilla@WoWUIDev/WoWI/Featured/Esamynn) |
| 04:06.11 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+v Esamynn|Away] by ChanServ |
| 04:14.53 | *** join/#wowuidev Jamash (~Thunderbi@c-98-212-84-42.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 04:37.48 | *** join/#wowuidev ShadniX (dagger@p5794195B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 05:36.11 | *** part/#wowuidev Seerah (~RyanNL@adsl-98-66-2-156.mem.bellsouth.net) |
| 05:42.03 | *** join/#wowuidev Dewin (~Daniel@c-50-181-188-143.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 05:50.33 | *** join/#wowuidev cogwheel (~vashfish@WoWUIDev/WoWProgramming/morlando/cogwheel) |
| 06:45.35 | Neffi | Semlar: ping |
| 06:45.43 | Semlar | neffi |
| 07:02.18 | *** join/#wowuidev VIad (~Vlad@151.117.45.31.customer.cdi.no) |
| 07:28.14 | airtonix | pls Semlar |
| 07:48.39 | *** join/#wowuidev Neffi (~Neffi@pool-98-116-157-170.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 07:49.57 | *** join/#wowuidev Breagha (~Breagha@83.143.120.140) |
| 07:55.26 | *** join/#wowuidev Kodiack (~Colto_000@121-73-86-207.cable.telstraclear.net) |
| 08:00.57 | *** join/#wowuidev Gintaro (~gintaro@geertswei.nl) |
| 08:23.24 | *** join/#wowuidev Esamynn|Away (~chatzilla@WoWUIDev/WoWI/Featured/Esamynn) |
| 08:23.24 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+v Esamynn|Away] by ChanServ |
| 09:26.24 | *** join/#wowuidev brykrys (~chatzilla@cpc2-craw2-0-0-cust191.16-3.cable.virginm.net) |
| 09:26.24 | *** join/#wowuidev brykrys (~chatzilla@WoWUIDev/Norganna/Dev/Brykrys) |
| 09:30.37 | Kalroth | http://img.pr0gramm.com/2014/06/14/bb3dd6565d8ed65c.gif poor kitty |
| 09:31.36 | *** join/#wowuidev stolenlegacy (~stolenleg@unaffiliated/stolenlegacy) |
| 10:00.22 | *** join/#wowuidev Diesal (~quassel@110-174-123-122.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 10:41.42 | *** join/#wowuidev Primer (~daniel@www.ceregatti.org) |
| 10:43.01 | *** join/#wowuidev Droolio (~drool@host86-162-42-166.range86-162.btcentralplus.com) |
| 10:55.01 | *** join/#wowuidev tharper (~tomh@unaffiliated/sioraiocht) |
| 11:20.14 | *** join/#wowuidev Ycarene (~jporterf@96.19.5.136) |
| 11:31.43 | *** join/#wowuidev Ycarene (~jporterf@96.19.5.136) |
| 12:18.21 | *** join/#wowuidev g0urra (~g0urra@unaffiliated/gourra) |
| 12:30.32 | *** join/#wowuidev Sajaki (~Sajaki@153.125-200-80.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) |
| 13:50.34 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3|hate`net (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 13:54.46 | *** join/#wowuidev Jamash (~Thunderbi@c-98-212-84-42.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 14:21.03 | Fisker | Thought I actually meant hey foxlit |
| 14:23.25 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3 (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 14:25.46 | *** join/#wowuidev karl_w_w (~Karl@61.116.96.58.static.exetel.com.au) |
| 14:26.49 | *** join/#wowuidev VIad (~Vlad@151.117.45.31.customer.cdi.no) |
| 14:46.54 | Gnarfoz | anyone know a http proxy that can listen on https? |
| 14:47.38 | Fisker | what do you mean http proxy? |
| 14:48.13 | Gnarfoz | a http proxy forward proxy server |
| 14:48.27 | Gnarfoz | not sure how that part is the unclear part :D |
| 14:49.21 | Fisker | wasn't sure what you would use it for |
| 14:49.56 | Gnarfoz | the regular use, accessing websites over http/https through it |
| 14:50.12 | Fisker | Yeah |
| 14:50.40 | Gnarfoz | but since I'm on dynamic IPs and the proxy server will be on my server, access control is my problem |
| 14:51.19 | Gnarfoz | will have to use user/pass, but doing that over http is a bit stupid, so I wanted to do it over https ^^ |
| 14:53.32 | Gnarfoz | well, Squid can probably do it (what can't it do?), but Squid is massive overkill for my purposes >_> |
| 15:03.04 | Jamash | Gnarfoz: The answer is "maybe sort of but it sucks" http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/23561/authenticating-a-proxy-server-over-https |
| 15:03.29 | Jamash | which I find baffling, but there it is |
| 15:04.40 | *** join/#wowuidev A-KO (as@2601:a:f00:465:e161:da50:5878:9aff) |
| 15:04.41 | *** join/#wowuidev A-KO (as@unaffiliated/a-ko) |
| 15:05.22 | Jamash | I think you'd have to use ipsec to get the desired functionality |
| 15:09.18 | Gnarfoz | Squid can do it, but only Chrome supports that (and only "kind of") |
| 15:12.33 | Gnarfoz | http://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/secure-web-proxy |
| 15:12.40 | *** join/#wowuidev zz_dano5 (~dano5@208.79-160-124.customer.lyse.net) |
| 15:12.41 | Gnarfoz | well, I guess the stunnel suggestion there is not the worst |
| 15:12.50 | Jamash | stunnel or vpn, yeah |
| 15:12.58 | Gnarfoz | tons better than setting up ipsec or openvpn |
| 15:13.21 | Gnarfoz | well tbh I already have openvpn set up, but I'd like something that works without having to start extra programs on the client |
| 15:13.25 | *** join/#wowuidev dusf123 (dusf@spoon.netsoc.tcd.ie) |
| 15:13.53 | dusf123 | i have a collection of old baclups of the WTF dir, is there one file that is modified every single login so I could determine which WTF dir backup is the most recent? |
| 15:14.17 | Gnarfoz | if anything, files in there are modified on logout |
| 15:14.46 | Gnarfoz | but I think most files are touched, because all addon settings are written out, every logout |
| 15:15.05 | Jamash | for loaded addons |
| 15:15.38 | Gnarfoz | Blizzard addons are always loaded and have SVs |
| 15:15.52 | Gnarfoz | so something should get saved every session? |
| 15:15.56 | Jamash | anyway config.wtf should be shouldn't it? |
| 15:16.28 | Gnarfoz | not sure, it might, yeah |
| 15:16.39 | Gnarfoz | haven't run WoW in a while... |
| 15:16.57 | *** join/#wowuidev zz_dano5 (~dano5@208.79-160-124.customer.lyse.net) |
| 15:21.25 | Jamash | dusf123: yeah, config.wtf is written every time |
| 15:21.29 | *** join/#wowuidev A-KO (as@2601:a:f00:465:e161:da50:5878:9aff) |
| 15:21.29 | *** join/#wowuidev A-KO (as@unaffiliated/a-ko) |
| 15:25.52 | dusf123 | thank you very much folks |
| 15:26.13 | dusf123 | apart from my specially selected addons, i use an addon ui pack |
| 15:26.35 | dusf123 | every now and then i will login and my buff frames etc are all over the place |
| 15:26.44 | dusf123 | any idea what could be causing this? |
| 15:26.55 | dusf123 | some of the addons seem to completely lose their settings |
| 15:27.43 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3|hate`net (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 15:31.10 | *** join/#wowuidev krka (krka@shell.bissa.eu) |
| 15:34.34 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3 (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 15:38.35 | *** join/#wowuidev Sharparam (~Sharparam@do.sharparam.com) |
| 15:44.27 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3|hate`net (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 15:47.11 | *** join/#wowuidev VIad1 (~Vlad@151.117.45.31.customer.cdi.no) |
| 15:52.55 | foxlit | the Persistence of Saved Variables God requires that you sacrifice a goat at least biweekly. |
| 15:53.52 | dusf123 | foxlit: is that in answer to my question? |
| 15:54.42 | foxlit | your question cannot reasonably be answered, so yes. |
| 15:57.10 | Fisker | You're unreasonable foxlit |
| 16:00.33 | foxlit | Fisker: very! |
| 16:00.42 | Fisker | I once heyed you |
| 16:01.30 | foxlit | Twice, probably. I might've scrolled past that recently. |
| 16:03.59 | dusf123 | foxlit: don't get me wrong, i like the answer |
| 16:04.24 | dusf123 | do you guys encounter similar prolems, addons somehow just losing their settings - rather quite often? |
| 16:04.45 | kd3|hate`net | the answer is to make backups. often |
| 16:04.54 | kd3|hate`net | it's been like that for a decade now |
| 16:05.09 | foxlit | No, things persist reasonably well for me. I don't run a lot of addons, though. |
| 16:07.11 | foxlit | [I once had a curious bug where I reset a subset of my own settings if the addon encountered an error while loading. That must've been frustrating for some people.] |
| 16:08.03 | karl_w_w | hey Fisker |
| 16:08.10 | Fisker | I don't hey karl_w_w |
| 16:08.27 | karl_w_w | you once heyed a guy |
| 16:08.46 | Fisker | Yeah I did |
| 16:09.02 | foxlit | So what's new in Fiskland, anyway? |
| 16:09.10 | foxlit | Fiskmark? |
| 16:09.20 | Fisker | You're in Fiskmark foxlit |
| 16:09.46 | foxlit | that's require more than a tiny bit of magic. |
| 16:09.52 | foxlit | s/s/d/ |
| 16:10.27 | Fisker | Well Fiskmark = Denmark = Foxmark |
| 16:10.33 | Fisker | So believe it |
| 16:10.38 | foxlit | Foxland > Fiskmark. |
| 16:10.44 | Fisker | :( |
| 16:10.49 | Fisker | Fiskland > Foxmark |
| 16:11.11 | Fisker | You don't have to be rude foxlit |
| 16:12.48 | foxlit | :( |
| 16:13.02 | Fisker | :() |
| 16:13.07 | Simca | no |
| 16:13.14 | Simca | nobody makes that face Fisker |
| 16:13.26 | Fisker | TMNT does |
| 16:13.41 | Simca | haha i guess they do |
| 16:14.02 | *** join/#wowuidev Gintaro (~gintaro@geertswei.nl) |
| 16:14.40 | Fisker | Yep |
| 16:15.29 | *** join/#wowuidev Dewin (~Daniel@c-50-181-188-143.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 16:20.32 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3|hate`net (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 16:58.16 | foxlit | so the alliance jade forest introduction feels like a cheap knock-off of the horde one |
| 17:01.28 | karl_w_w | almost everything alliance is a cheap horde knock-off |
| 17:03.28 | *** join/#wowuidev cogwheel (~vashfish@WoWUIDev/WoWProgramming/morlando/cogwheel) |
| 17:07.48 | *** join/#wowuidev Caleb| (~Caleb|@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/EnsidiaFails/Caleb) |
| 17:07.48 | *** join/#wowuidev mitch0 (~mitch@drvolomdental.hu) |
| 17:07.54 | *** join/#wowuidev Iriel (~Iriel@173-8-135-209-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 17:07.55 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Iriel] by ChanServ |
| 17:28.02 | *** join/#wowuidev Teazle (~Teazle@c-a6ece253.05-84-73746f43.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 17:30.00 | Teazle | good evening - im trying to make my addon react when a buff is recieved, that is not shown in the buffwindow (cannot be reported by unit_aura or UnitAura()) - for example Seal of Truth. My work around to detect this is to register event COMBAT_TEXT_UPDATE and its underlying SPELL_AURA_START/END - Is there a better way? and also, how can i check if it actually active via code? |
| 17:37.47 | Semlar | Teazle: is the buff cast by the player? |
| 17:38.10 | Teazle | yes |
| 17:38.36 | Semlar | it likely fires a UNIT_SPELLCAST_START event |
| 17:38.45 | Semlar | er SUCCEEDED |
| 17:38.48 | Semlar | probably not start |
| 17:39.06 | Semlar | i doubt you can get the duration if it doesn't show up as an aura |
| 17:39.28 | Teazle | the duration isnt important |
| 17:39.32 | Teazle | its cast/uncast |
| 17:39.50 | Teazle | thank you, missed the spellcast event when looking through documenation. will check it out! |
| 17:40.14 | Semlar | does it not show up in the combat log? |
| 17:40.57 | Teazle | it does |
| 17:41.18 | Teazle | well, i think. might need to check that |
| 17:41.19 | Semlar | oh, then you can just use COMBAT_LOG_EVENT_UNFILTERED and check the SPELL_AURA_APPLIED and SPELL_AURA_REMOVED events |
| 17:41.55 | Teazle | how could i check if Seal of Truth is active then? atm my addon just sends it all to one function that checks it all |
| 17:41.57 | Gnarfoz | if you can do it without using C_L_E_U you might be better off, though |
| 17:42.11 | Semlar | you know it's active if it hasn't fallen off yet after it's been applied |
| 17:42.14 | Teazle | it doesn't show up on UnitAura() |
| 17:42.14 | Gnarfoz | if it's active? UnitBuff() probably |
| 17:42.18 | Teazle | no |
| 17:42.28 | Semlar | you'll need to track it with a variable |
| 17:42.59 | Semlar | so depending on how many auras you're tracking you might want to make a table to put them into |
| 17:43.33 | Teazle | dont think u can have more then one seal active at a time, so that shouldnt be a problem, should it? |
| 17:43.42 | Gnarfoz | indeed |
| 17:44.37 | Semlar | assuming SPELL_AURA_APPLIED and SPELL_AURA_REMOVED always fire for it then you can keep track of whether it's on you with a boolean |
| 17:45.36 | Teazle | thats assuming i wanna do it with CLUE though isnt it? |
| 17:46.16 | Semlar | any way you do it is going to require that |
| 17:46.18 | Teazle | unit_spellcast_succeeded triggers for seal |
| 17:46.20 | Semlar | if you can't check whether it's on you |
| 17:46.37 | Teazle | gotta find out if any triggers when it fades |
| 17:46.50 | Semlar | does the ui show that the seal is on you in some way |
| 17:47.08 | Teazle | combat_text_update fires always for it too, but its kinda unreliable - it doesnt print message before another event happens |
| 17:47.10 | Teazle | no |
| 17:48.03 | Gnarfoz | sure it does |
| 17:48.14 | Gnarfoz | the seal bar button is lit up |
| 17:48.22 | Semlar | seal bar? |
| 17:48.25 | Semlar | is that like a stance bar |
| 17:48.26 | Gnarfoz | seal bar. |
| 17:48.27 | Gnarfoz | yes |
| 17:48.41 | Semlar | okay then there's some way to check that |
| 17:48.58 | Semlar | is it literally the same as the stance bar? |
| 17:49.05 | Semlar | because it may just use the stance functions |
| 17:49.31 | Teazle | hm yea |
| 17:49.57 | Semlar | type /fstack and hover over the seal button to check the name of the frame |
| 17:50.24 | Teazle | it is the stancebar |
| 17:50.38 | Teazle | thats a neat command. |
| 17:50.43 | Teazle | couldve used that forever ago :P |
| 17:51.17 | Semlar | i can't remember if it used GetShapeshiftForm or something else |
| 17:51.29 | Semlar | the last time i played a paladin they used auras for stances |
| 17:51.44 | Teazle | i dont think it does, cause u dont actually change a form |
| 17:51.56 | Semlar | type /run print(GetShapeshiftForm()) |
| 17:52.23 | Teazle | huh, appearantly it does |
| 17:52.29 | Teazle | that simplifies things |
| 17:53.14 | Semlar | UPDATE_SHAPESHIFT_FORMS might be the event to watch for a stance change |
| 17:53.15 | Teazle | assumed it didnt use that cause you dont actually shapeshift, but it works for warriors so i shouldve guessed it. oh well. to the scripcave! |
| 17:53.51 | Teazle | thats when u gain a stance though, probably not when changing |
| 17:53.57 | Teazle | thanks! :) |
| 17:54.05 | Semlar | well you gain a stance when you change stances |
| 17:54.15 | Teazle | shapeshift_form would do it |
| 17:54.24 | Teazle | forms would only tell me if i get a new one |
| 17:54.39 | Teazle | was a bit slow there, _form will probably do fine! |
| 17:55.07 | Semlar | okay yeah i didn't realize there were two almost identical events |
| 17:55.41 | Teazle | it wasnt meant to point out that i was looking for form. i was just slowing "catching" it too |
| 17:56.30 | Semlar | you might have to watch both of the events |
| 17:57.19 | Semlar | i'm not sure if UPDATE_SHAPESHIFT_FORM would fire when you first load in |
| 17:57.29 | Teazle | dont know |
| 17:58.00 | Teazle | me being smart - why wont addon spout out that USF has triggered? |
| 17:58.15 | Teazle | disabled it to test Gnarfoz' thought of the stancebar :P |
| 17:58.44 | Gnarfoz | ? |
| 17:58.56 | Gnarfoz | I never mentioned the stance bar |
| 17:59.00 | Gnarfoz | :D |
| 18:00.06 | Teazle | seal bar |
| 18:00.11 | Teazle | same ting. |
| 18:04.31 | foxlit | Fel Flame: Deals 9,648 Shadowflame damage to the enemy. Generates 9,227 Demonic Fury. |
| 18:04.34 | foxlit | That just can't be right. |
| 18:05.20 | Gnarfoz | it probably isn't :D |
| 18:05.44 | foxlit | why are the tooltips lying to me? :( |
| 18:06.05 | Semlar | because they know you can't do anything about it |
| 18:08.33 | foxlit | wowhead suggests similar nonsense; "863 (+ 85% of Spell power) Demonic Fury" |
| 18:09.14 | Semlar | well, they're displaying the formula the tooltip uses |
| 18:10.16 | Semlar | not knowing anything about warlocks i can't comment on whether that's actually accurate |
| 18:10.26 | foxlit | demonic fury caps at 1k. |
| 18:10.44 | Semlar | i'm guessing fel flame doesn't instantly cap it every cast |
| 18:11.02 | *** join/#wowuidev Amarande (~Amarande@24-151-100-63.dhcp.nwtn.ct.charter.com) |
| 18:11.27 | foxlit | epirical observation shows it doesn't. Clearly warlocks are underpowered and this must be fixed immediately. |
| 18:11.58 | Semlar | can you tell how much it's generating? |
| 18:12.21 | foxlit | That sounds like work. |
| 18:12.34 | Semlar | yeah that's probably too much effort |
| 18:13.02 | Semlar | is it 15 |
| 18:13.30 | Semlar | http://wowpedia.org/Demonic_Fury god knows this is probably outdated |
| 18:14.10 | Amarande | foxlit: well, Demonology and Affliction could use a little more consistent love |
| 18:14.42 | Semlar | 85% of your spellpower would be a ridiculous number if it caps at 1000 |
| 18:14.48 | Amarande | I'm not sure if Demo has EVER been the choice spec for lock except when SL/SL was the thing for PvP in BC |
| 18:15.06 | Amarande | and even when Aff does start off well out of the gate, Destro always seems to outdo it by the end of that expansion |
| 18:16.53 | Amarande | 'course Destro is also a lot more glass cannony and Blizzard seems to have this idea that specs with good survivability should be poorer DPS choices heh |
| 18:17.01 | Amarande | let's put it this way, I'm glad I quit playing mage :p |
| 18:18.10 | Amarande | since apparently Blizz has decided that mages actually are *supposed to* suffer from the pathetic survivability that had grated on me in 5.0/5.1 |
| 18:18.26 | Amarande | as, apparently, the tradeoff for their spot on the dps ladder in groups |
| 18:20.18 | Amarande | though tbh, the whole idea of dps 'rankings' is really not a good thing in general ... there shouldn't be a 20% variance between top and bottom dps specs like there is in BiS atm :| |
| 18:26.55 | *** join/#wowuidev kd3 (~Kaydeethr@unaffiliated/kd3) |
| 18:31.59 | *** join/#wowuidev Seerah (~RyanNL@adsl-98-66-2-156.mem.bellsouth.net) |
| 18:31.59 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Seerah] by ChanServ |
| 18:32.07 | *** join/#wowuidev zz_Cidan (~cidan@2605:e000:9fc0:4d:30a7:ac73:63:4504) |
| 18:32.26 | *** join/#wowuidev Cidan (~cidan@conspiracy/developer/Cidan) |
| 18:36.42 | Jamash | I filled out blizzard's heroes of the storm survey, in which I told them I'm not playing because I don't want to get verbally abused by moba players |
| 18:37.41 | Jamash | but I haven't actually played, so I don't know, is it really as bad as the internets say? |
| 18:39.51 | Amarande | it sounds like a moba |
| 18:40.24 | Fisker | gj Jamash |
| 18:41.02 | Amarande | MOBAs are the "res frigida" so to speak these days for some reason, so I'm sure they disproportionately attract the kind of immature brogamers that most of us try to avoid |
| 18:44.23 | Stanzilla | wow Amarande |
| 18:44.30 | Stanzilla | that was a lot of bullshit about warlock |
| 18:47.03 | Amarande | Stanzilla: I'm going based off past gleanings and current noxxic dps rankings data |
| 18:47.25 | Amarande | Stanzilla: I'm trying to remember the last expansion where Destro did not take over the roost by the end (if it hadn't before) and I'm not thinking of one. |
| 18:47.31 | Amarande | Vanilla maybe? LOL |
| 18:48.32 | Stanzilla | affliction is the spec with the higherst dps atm |
| 18:48.37 | Stanzilla | noxxic is a load of crap |
| 18:48.38 | Amarande | And yeah, Destro is much more glass cannony, you usually use the imp (and it wouldn't help to use the voidwalker anyway, much like with most non-BM Hunters, if you're not using the pet-based spec your damage is so balanced towards your personal output that the pet won't hold aggro anyway) |
| 18:48.44 | Stanzilla | you have no experience in high end raiding |
| 18:49.18 | Amarande | plus destro involves having to mostly stand there and spam spells like a mage, while with aff you have more ability to move and run because dots are normally fast or instance |
| 18:49.37 | Amarande | yeah, my last experience with top end raiding was in Wrath and that was as a DK, heh |
| 18:49.37 | Stanzilla | demo was teh to-go spec in throne of thunder |
| 18:49.39 | Stanzilla | etc |
| 18:50.03 | Amarande | and yeah, I am going off the "max" DPS table, rather than the "realistic" one, at that |
| 18:50.07 | Stanzilla | please stop talking about warlocks :( |
| 18:50.18 | Amarande | come to think of it I'm not sure the "max" table is of any value at all, though, *especially* in MoP |
| 18:50.34 | Amarande | have there even been any patchwerk-like fights in mop that let you just stand there and let loose at 110%? |
| 18:50.53 | Amarande | seems like they've taken the whole kung fu asia theme up to eleven, basically every fight is high mobility |
| 18:51.19 | Stanzilla | iron juggernaut |
| 18:59.20 | Amarande | ah |
| 18:59.47 | Amarande | I played warlock a lot in BC but got rather discouraged from the class because of the various levels of fuckedness associated with being a fresh 70 warlock in late BC |
| 19:00.19 | Amarande | although I did get it to 80 in WotLK before I took a long break and didn't come back until 3.3.xish on my DK |
| 19:01.16 | Amarande | (which wasn't so much tied to any specific class, as to the fact that I could barely even get anywhere even in dungeons because 5-mans looking for DPS weren't common enough and most of the time I lacked the reflexes to get in a PST before it was filled :P) |
| 19:02.32 | Amarande | oh, and on top of that the fact that before the dungeon finder you mostly had to stand around in town twiddling thumbs if you wanted a dungeon group at all, no dailies meanwhile for you since all the recruiting was in /2 :p |
| 19:04.22 | Amarande | Stanzilla: mind you you may have had better experiences than I with warlockdom in BC |
| 19:05.10 | Amarande | in my case, I hit 70 really late in the expansion, almost at 2.4, nobody did regular 70's anymore at that point (unless you were a tank, in which case they'd go anywhere you took them, LOL), heroics groups basically all wanted T5 by then, couldn't go to Kara without prep gear from heroics |
| 19:05.35 | Amarande | and the final straw the fact that I was on a battlegroup where Alliance practically never queued for AV, so there was no efficient way to farm honour to bootstrap that way |
| 19:06.50 | Amarande | and I mean literally anywhere with a tank, when I rolled a prot pally I could even assemble groups for places like Stratholme at that point ... I could probably have said "Tank LFM to jump off the edge of outland" and got a group :D |
| 19:09.29 | Amarande | for the warlock I had to actually pay to transfer off server to even see kara |
| 19:09.58 | Amarande | I literally started looking around for "hmmm what server has decent population and really terrible progression" LOL |
| 19:12.00 | zenzelezz | "A RAID member disk walks into a bar. Bartender asks what's wrong. 'Parity error'. 'Yeah, you look a bit off.'" |
| 19:12.14 | Amarande | hah |
| 19:14.35 | Gnarfoz | poor parity RAID levels |
| 19:14.46 | Gnarfoz | a RAID 1 member would have been fine! |
| 19:53.53 | kd3 | bleh. I need a new mouse. I've worn out the left mouse button... I tend to double-click whenever I want to single-click |
| 20:05.46 | *** join/#wowuidev Archarodim (HydraIRC@78.203.110.56) |
| 20:14.07 | Teazle | Question: I'm trying to change the VertexColor of a buttons texture (like when low on mana) but using MyButton1:SetVertexColor() produces an error message - so does MyButton1Icon - Blizzards standard UI seem to use MyButton1Icon, but it does not seem to work for me, presumably because i dont create a whole new icon in the frame, but set a texture? |
| 20:14.33 | Teazle | And, the actual question: How do i set a VertexColor for a texture sat with for example MyButton1:SetPushedTexture() ? |
| 20:14.50 | Semlar | button:GetNormalTexture():SetVertexColor() or something |
| 20:15.00 | Amarande | kd3: yeah that's usually how my mice die, too |
| 20:15.13 | Amarande | I might need a new mouse soon myself ... my wireless mouse is having trouble with the battery coming unseated while mousing |
| 20:15.24 | Semlar | well button:GetPushedTexture():SetVertexColor() |
| 20:15.50 | Semlar | you need the texture object before you can set the vertex color and it's separate from the button itself |
| 20:16.05 | Teazle | y, that worked |
| 20:16.12 | Semlar | http://wowprogramming.com/docs/widgets/Button/GetPushedTexture |
| 20:16.15 | Teazle | didnt think of that because it felt to nested to make sense |
| 20:16.29 | Semlar | local texture = button:GetPushedTexture() |
| 20:16.33 | Teazle | y, it works fine |
| 20:16.34 | Semlar | texture:SetVertexColor() |
| 20:16.48 | foxlit | I like "didn't think of tht because it makes no sense for :GetX() not to return the x from :SetX(x)" better. |
| 20:17.02 | *** join/#wowuidev Simca (~Simca@c-76-123-93-232.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) |
| 20:17.16 | Semlar | tries to calm foxlit down |
| 20:18.14 | foxlit | trying is the first step to failing, Semlar. |
| 20:18.51 | Teazle | no, i am no pro at LUA, and because of that, a functions subfunction calling itself with the value of itsselfs subfunction did not seem right |
| 20:19.06 | Teazle | in its own fetching function |
| 20:19.40 | Teazle | but it seems to work, so |
| 20:19.46 | Semlar | http://wowprogramming.com/docs/widgets/Button/ |
| 20:21.18 | Semlar | buttons are special widgets because they create their textures for you and if you want to access their textures they have their own methods |
| 20:22.02 | Teazle | So it would appear yes. its just hard to wrap around if you havent fiddled with it very much |
| 20:35.50 | *** join/#wowuidev MysticalOS (~Myst@h185.242.23.98.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) |
| 20:41.53 | Gnarfoz | (and that's not a property of Lua, anyway) |
| 20:48.00 | *** join/#wowuidev NeoTron_ (~neotron@c-50-135-78-244.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 20:52.11 | Simca | Teazle: reasoning behind that is there are only two ways to address a frame - you can name it in the function it is created (it's an arg of CreateFrame/CreateTexture) or you can assign the result of CreateFrame/CreateTexture to a local/global variable. When defining their own textures, Buttons give 'nil' as the 'name' arg for CreateTexture, and then they assign the texture to a local table. So the only way to ever access that texture i |
| 20:52.11 | Simca | s local to that Button's code. |
| 20:52.33 | Simca | lots of TL;DR but just in case you wondered |
| 20:56.29 | Gnarfoz | GetChildren() :P |
| 20:57.54 | Torhal | Gnarfoz: No, it's MakeChildren() unless you're adopting. |
| 20:59.01 | *** join/#wowuidev NeoTron (~neotron@c-50-135-78-244.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 21:00.33 | Trela | kd3: I had the same problem with my mouse at work. The issue was the metal trigger had warped. I opened it, bent it slightly, and has not had the issue in two years since. :D |
| 21:02.29 | *** join/#wowuidev cogwheel (~vashfish@WoWUIDev/WoWProgramming/morlando/cogwheel) |
| 21:03.45 | nevcairiel | i may just be spoiled or something, but before i try fixing my own mouse i just buy a new one =P |
| 21:04.27 | Gnarfoz | I would, if this model was still sold |
| 21:04.35 | Gnarfoz | Torhal: GrabChildren() |
| 21:04.47 | Torhal | Ahahahahaha |
| 21:04.56 | Torhal | detains Gnarfoz. |
| 21:05.05 | Gnarfoz | GrabTorhal()! |
| 21:05.09 | Torhal | NOOOOO |
| 21:05.15 | Gnarfoz | the tables have turned |
| 21:05.28 | Gnarfoz | (table.invert()?) |
| 21:05.33 | Torhal | (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ |
| 21:05.38 | Teazle | Simca i read info, its always good to get info |
| 21:10.04 | Amarande | heh |
| 21:10.16 | Amarande | being a parent in the cyber world must be an especially stressful experience |
| 21:10.24 | Amarande | after all, most of the time when you die, the OS kills your kids as part of the cleanup process |
| 21:11.09 | Amarande | unless you made sure to make special arrangements to put them under foster care with init |
| 21:35.41 | *** join/#wowuidev Sajaki (~Sajaki@153.125-200-80.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) |
| 21:55.06 | *** join/#wowuidev Seerah (~RyanNL@adsl-98-66-2-156.mem.bellsouth.net) |
| 21:55.07 | *** mode/#wowuidev [+o Seerah] by ChanServ |
| 22:22.06 | Fisker | tickles foxlit |
| 22:25.40 | foxlit | for s in coroutine.wrap(munch)(coroutine.yield, …<< I think I’m confusing myself more than I’m confusing Semlar here. |
| 22:26.32 | Fisker | :D |
| 22:27.00 | Fisker | I am tired though |
| 22:31.17 | *** join/#wowuidev Funkeh` (~Funkeh`@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/Ace3/BigWigs/funkeh) |
| 22:33.01 | Simca | foxlit: pretty sure you can count the number of addons that have properly implemented coroutines on one hand |
| 22:33.25 | Simca | Routes is the only one I know of off the top of my head |
| 22:34.41 | kd3 | and time for england to start drinking their sorrows away |
| 22:35.13 | foxlit | Simca: almost nobody has any actual computational tasks. |
| 22:36.02 | Simca | Recount and friends, but they're usually limited by COMBAT_LOG events, not CPU |
| 22:36.33 | Simca | and until you get out of combat, it won't help anyway, the work will just keep piling up |
| 22:36.53 | foxlit | no, that’d be entirely pointless and counterproductive. |
| 22:36.53 | Gnarfoz | summing up a few numbers is not really an "actual computational task" |
| 22:37.01 | foxlit | ^ |
| 22:37.14 | kd3 | and the sorrow-drinking can stop |
| 22:37.16 | kd3 | that was quick |
| 22:37.20 | Gnarfoz | I was going to say... |
| 22:37.40 | Gnarfoz | two minutes is not bad |
| 22:37.52 | foxlit | not even enough time to prepare proper tea :( |
| 22:38.21 | foxlit | I’m just thinking of abusing this for an iterator, Simca. |
| 22:39.03 | Fisker | No tea |
| 22:39.07 | foxlit | (and I say abusing because trashing a table and returning ipairs() would almost certainly be better in these circumstances, but that’s not cool enough.) |
| 23:15.19 | Semlar | tries to calm foxlit down |
| 23:15.34 | foxlit | I think you’re repeating yourself. |
| 23:15.50 | Semlar | glitch in the matrix |
| 23:33.59 | Jamash | I refuse to care about garbage collection performance, I use anonymous tables whenever I feel like it |
| 23:37.15 | *** join/#wowuidev Kodiack (~Colto_000@121-73-86-207.cable.telstraclear.net) |
| 23:41.03 | Amarande | His name is Jamash, Destroyer of System Resources |
| 23:42.52 | foxlit | Devourer is perhaps more appropriate. |
| 23:43.23 | Jamash | pro tip: don't execute perl -e 'fork() while fork()' |
| 23:44.28 | *** join/#wowuidev Amarande_ (~Amarande@24-151-100-63.dhcp.nwtn.ct.charter.com) |
| 23:44.50 | *** join/#wowuidev zenzelezz (~Lasse@cm-84.212.85.55.getinternet.no) |
| 23:45.11 | Jamash | I came up with a less explosive but still somewhat troublesome variant, which is 'exit() if fork()' |
| 23:45.38 | Jamash | I'm still not sure how to get rid of that one except via killall |
| 23:49.49 | Jamash | er, I mean 'exit() while fork()' |
| 23:50.19 | foxlit | not exit() until fork()? |
| 23:53.45 | Jamash | sure |
| 23:53.51 | Jamash | I haven't actually written any perl in a while |
| 23:53.54 | Jamash | ha |
| 23:53.55 | Jamash | while |
| 23:54.00 | Jamash | kills himself |
| 23:54.35 | Jamash | anyway it runs round the pid table endlessly |
| 23:54.58 | foxlit | I haven’t written any perl, period. |
| 23:55.14 | Jamash | the language doesn't matter much, it's just a relatively terse syntax |
| 23:55.21 | *** join/#wowuidev pompy (~Mike@c-50-166-85-212.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 23:55.22 | Jamash | for that ridiculous idiom |
| 23:55.59 | foxlit | ruby’s like that, isn’t it? |
| 23:57.32 | Jamash | another variant is 'print"hi I'm $PID\n" and exit(0) until fork()' |
| 23:57.50 | Jamash | I've never done anything in ruby |
| 23:57.53 | Jamash | I hear it's pretty good |
| 23:58.30 | Neffi | I hear only hipsters like it |
| 23:59.08 | Jamash | I get the impression that ruby and python are both intended to be what perl would have been if it had been designed instead of aggregating |
