IRC log for #sporewiki on 20161109

00:05.04Charles_BotOh my
00:08.03DrodoEmpireHEY HEY HEY                         HEEY HEY HEY
00:08.47Xhowat
00:09.13DrodoEmpireThe video <.<
00:09.42*** join/#sporewiki The_Randomness (~chatzilla@2601:441:1:5b80:1cb4:5854:b59:eef0)
00:09.42*** mode/#sporewiki [+o The_Randomness] by ChanServ
00:18.51XhoI blame David Bowie for ruining the universal harmony
00:19.14DrodoEmpireHm
00:20.06DrodoEmpireI think I'ma start a new fic
00:23.13HachimanOh?
00:23.38The_Randomness:o
00:24.04XhoWormy_: The shooting's been confirmed
00:24.38DrodoEmpireYeah. I had an idea for an episodic sorta fic, because it seems like a good idea
00:25.08DrodoEmpireBasically, it'd be a Silvan expedition sent in to the gigaquadrant, tasked with learning as much as possible. I think I discussed it a while ago
00:25.39DrodoEmpireBut now I might write the prologue for real
00:25.47DrodoEmpireXho: Was anyone hurt or killed?
00:28.43Wormy_damn
00:30.52DrodoEmpireAnd then I'd need someone for a first destination
00:31.23HachimanThe Loron
00:31.30DrodoEmpireolol
00:32.26DrodoEmpireNah, probably something in the quadrants
00:32.40DrodoEmpireI'd say Galactica, and that'd be the logical thing
00:32.54DrodoEmpireBut Charles is literally allergic to character RPs
00:32.59DrodoEmpire<.<
00:33.37HachimanHuh
00:34.24HachimanWonder why that is
00:34.43DrodoEmpireWell, I joke
00:35.10DrodoEmpireBut he isn't a fan of adventure style RPs, which would be a big part of this
00:36.09DrodoEmpireBut it'd also involve a lot of negotiation and the sort, which he does like
00:42.14*** join/#sporewiki Zillafire101 (4933de11@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.51.222.17)
00:43.11Zillafire101Hello all.
00:46.07DrodoEmpireHi
00:47.43Wormy_lost nuke might have been found http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37875697
00:49.48Wormy_or ayy lmao saucer
00:49.59DrodoEmpirehur
01:09.57Wormy_DrodoEmpire:  One person killed, two people injured
01:10.25Wormy_California, female gunman
01:12.35DrodoEmpireBloody he;;
01:19.06*** join/#sporewiki ZF101 (4933de11@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.51.222.17)
01:34.28Wormy_night
02:03.48*** join/#sporewiki NeonPanda (65b30e25@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.179.14.37)
02:03.59NeonPandahi all
04:06.27Tek0516DrodoEmpire: We need to follow Trump's advice. We must build a wall on our southern border and make them pay for it!
04:06.39DrodoEmpire<.<
04:07.22Tek0516CBC has it at 191-187 for Clinton right now. >.<
04:07.42Tek0516With denial over Florida
04:07.43DrodoEmpireI mean, with the amount of melodramatic Americans who've vowed to leave if Trump wins, we might have to
04:09.06Tek0516It's kind of depressing watching the mood go downhill in the CBC coverage. O.O
04:09.34DrodoEmpirePfft
04:09.51DrodoEmpireEveryone's so triggered over trump
04:09.54DrodoEmpireMakes me laugh
04:12.21Tek0516It's not even an American station, it's CBC. The people in it have gone from reasonably happy to "s***, is this actually happening?" XD They have some American Clinton supporter who literally said they have nothing left to lose before starting their comment.
04:13.19DrodoEmpireYeah...
04:17.48Tek0516DrodoEmpire: The Canadian citizenship and immigration website crashed. O.o
04:17.57DrodoEmpireYep
04:18.01DrodoEmpireHacker from /pol/
04:59.59*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.146)
05:01.07ImpyDroidHOLY FUCKING SHIT
05:01.09ImpyDroidSo
05:01.23ImpyDroidThe hairball is actually winning?
05:02.50*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
05:03.12Liquid_InkHey, how's everyone doing?
05:09.43DrodoEmpireI'm great
05:10.06DrodoEmpire'Cause Daddy's winning
05:10.07DrodoEmpire:>
05:10.35DrodoEmpirehttp://puu.sh/sbRXJ/6d48857d3c.png
05:12.45Tek0516The CBC people have basically given up at this point.
05:14.08DrodoEmpirea y y  l m a o
05:14.31Tek0516They even jumped to the Hitler reference. >.>
05:15.03DrodoEmpireA Y Y  L M A O
05:18.36ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: The Dark One rises
05:18.44ImpyDroidWell
05:18.44Liquid_InkXD
05:18.48ImpyDroidThe Orange One
05:19.47*** join/#sporewiki Charles_Bot (uid94017@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ulfuimfhcytogdpf)
05:19.53Charles_BotWell shit
05:20.05Charles_BotDemocrats have no plan for this
05:20.07ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: PROPAGANDA THE REICH WILL RISE
05:20.12Charles_BotNothing to fall back to
05:20.18ImpyDroidTHE RISE OF EEEVIL
05:20.33Charles_BotI would be extremely surprised if Clinton actually has a concession speech
05:20.50Charles_BotReady to go, that is
05:20.51Liquid_InkIt's interesting how the stock market is plummeting. They really had no plan for a Trump win.
05:21.10ImpyDroidCan Hill still have a comeback?
05:21.22ImpyDroidThere are still like 90 votes remaining
05:21.43Liquid_InkIt's possible, but would be a miracle.
05:22.01Liquid_InkAlthough, miracles one way or another is what this election is about.
05:22.16Charles_BotImpydroid Let me look at the map
05:22.16ImpyDroidI expected him to win
05:22.26Tek0516Charles_Bot: We're all fucked.
05:22.30ImpyDroidSensible people usually lose elections because they do not vote
05:23.01Liquid_InkYeah, people hiding under the bed because they think if they ignore it it will go away
05:23.06Charles_BotClinton needs Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona to win
05:23.24Charles_BotShe is losing in all of these states but Penn
05:23.24Tek0516Charles_Bot: You can just see the people on CBC just dying inside as this goes on.
05:23.35Charles_BotIn which she is tied with DJT
05:23.46Charles_BotYeah, there's no way at this point
05:23.57DrodoEmpireayy
05:23.59DrodoEmpireAYYY
05:24.07Charles_BotHonestly
05:24.11DrodoTrumpireAYYYYYY
05:24.18Charles_BotIf Donald Trump wins, I'm accepting that
05:24.26Charles_BotIt was a free and fair election
05:24.28DrodoTrumpireAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
05:24.39WallriosWE NEED TO BUILD A WALL
05:24.45Tek0516This election... shit. Fair election indeed, but shit.
05:24.59WallriosI should take an orange wig
05:25.33Charles_BotThis is how our system works. I feel like a stranger in my own country, but this is how everyone on the other side has been feeling for eight years.
05:25.42Tek0516The Canadian Citizenship and Immigration website had literally crashed tonight.
05:25.58Charles_BotSo it's time to give them a shot at owning it for a while.
05:28.40Tek0516At least the Canadian dollar might go- oh shit our dollar apparently fell.
05:29.15Charles_BotWatch the stages of grief over the next three days or so
05:29.19Charles_BotAlso the stock market
05:29.43Tek0516I wasn't prepared for this.
05:29.53Charles_BotI'm still deciding whether I want to throw all of my money at it as it's falling. The big question is whether it will rebound.
05:31.02Charles_BotIf anyone has any analysis questions about the next four, eight, or ten years, I can answer them
05:31.18DrodoTrumpireI think the market always slumps after big votes like this, especially if they go in the "wrong" direction
05:31.21DrodoTrumpireNot a big deal
05:31.32Tek0516Yeah
05:31.43Charles_BotNot -exactly-
05:32.17DrodoTrumpireOkay, then what happens?
05:32.20Tek0516Well it's going to slump. The question is on recovery.
05:32.42Tek0516I keep seeing the Brexit reference a lot.
05:33.07*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@host-211-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
05:33.34Charles_BotTrump as president means more uncertainty, a departure from the status quo towards policies that diverge from the economically liberal (old sense of the term) consensus that has governed American foreign and economic policies no matter which party is in office
05:34.02DrodoTrumpireEhh true
05:34.42Charles_BotTrump is publicly against trade, has spoken out against America's role as a global stabilizer and guarantor, has thrown doubt on NATO, etc
05:35.28Charles_BotUncertainty/change/divergences from the status quo = generally bad for investment
05:36.23ImpyDroidKwkw
05:36.25ImpyDroidKek
05:36.28Charles_BotSame for Brexit, its uncharted territory and represented the UK throwing off what made it economically relevant in the 21st century in favor of a much more uncertain future
05:37.44Charles_BotSo in this case, Tek is right, the question is whether investors will stay their hand as investments and securities and keep withdrawing their money when they see the market continuing in a downwards slope
05:38.21Charles_BotOr will they learn from Brexit and start throwing money at it, causing it to stabilize and leading stock prices to quickly recover?
05:39.38Charles_BotI honestly don't know the answer to that question
05:43.08Charles_BotI hope that makes sense?
05:44.11WallriosYeah
05:46.50WallriosWhen will the remaining states throw their vote?
05:54.31Tek0516Whenever it gets counted
05:56.56*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@195.19.236.11)
05:58.21*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@195.19.236.11)
06:00.00*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@195.19.236.11)
06:00.39Charles_BotImpyDroid Battleground states take longer to count because their results are far more uncertain and you need a larger sample until you can definitively make a call
06:01.45Charles_BotI have no idea what alaska's doing
06:02.07Charles_BotPolls closed 2 hours ago
06:02.20Charles_BotOh my
06:02.25ImpyDroid2Hm?
06:02.30Charles_BotI'm hearing shouts of "FUCK"
06:02.37Charles_Bot"WHAT THE FUCK"
06:02.41Charles_Bot"FUUUUUUCK"
06:02.48Charles_BotUpstairs xD
06:03.05ImpyDroid2So Hill got a few more votes
06:03.10ImpyDroid2Where are these from?
06:03.41Charles_BotThe vote tally isn't important, a lot of the states she's getting are safe
06:03.50Charles_BotWe knew she was going to get those
06:04.03Charles_BotWhat's important is the battleground states
06:04.49ImpyDroid2And Hair won these, as far as I understand
06:05.06ImpyDroid2right?
06:06.07ImpyDroid2What are these two big undecided states on the northeast of Burgerland called?
06:06.18Charles_BotIs winning at this stage
06:06.25Charles_BotPlease use their actual names
06:06.47Charles_BotThat's Maine and New Hampshite
06:06.53Charles_BotHampshire
06:07.16Charles_BotThose will probably go Clinton
06:09.27ImpyDroid2Right
06:09.34ImpyDroid2Maine and New Hampshire
06:12.58Tek0516Part of the problem is some states that were supposed to be relatively safe she's now losing in.
06:15.04Tek0516As far as I've seen she's basically lost or is losing in all the major battleground states.
06:16.33Tek0516I have a class I didn't even want to go to in the morning. Should probably get what sleep I can.
06:16.51ImpyDroid2Charles_Bot: Wait, I meant the ones with more voters
06:17.00ImpyDroid2Pennsylvania and Michigan
06:17.10ImpyDroid2What can these vote for?
06:17.21ImpyDroid2*For whom cana these vote?
06:17.23ImpyDroid2*can
06:19.16DrodoAwayI sleep
06:19.32DrodoAwaySafe in the knowledge that Daddy will be our next president
06:19.37DrodoAway:>
06:25.58ImpyDroid2Tek0516: You ought to rename himself "Kek0516" for the duration of the day
06:26.06ImpyDroid2*yourself
06:36.45Charles_BotImpydroid2 All voting is over
06:36.58Charles_BotThe polls are closed, we're counting votes now
06:48.09*** join/#sporewiki dinoman9877 (4ad7c810@gateway/web/freenode/ip.74.215.200.16)
06:49.43*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
06:51.29ImpyDroid2Charles_Bot: Damn you nitpicker
06:51.39ImpyDroid2Could they have voted for
06:51.50ImpyDroid2For whom could they HAVE voted
06:59.59Charles_BotThere goes Pennsylvania
07:00.23Charles_BotIt's over Impy
07:00.28Charles_BotImpyDroid2
07:25.45*** join/#sporewiki Ghelae (1f32d0f7@gateway/web/freenode/ip.31.50.208.247)
07:25.46*** mode/#sporewiki [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
07:30.20ImpyDroid2Yiy
07:31.04ImpyDroid2Charles_Bot: Hair already got the needed 270?
07:32.23Charles_BotNo
07:32.42Charles_BotBut there's no way Clinton can at this point
07:33.06Charles_Bot(The electoral college is weird and counterintuitive, just roll with it)
07:36.53ImpyDroid2HAIR WON
07:36.55ImpyDroid2HAIR WON
07:37.00ImpyDroid2AHAHAHAHAHAHA
07:37.11*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
07:37.35TechnobliteratorThis is one of those times when I am very sad to be right
07:38.20ImpyDroid2Does not matter; we aren't Americans
07:38.35ImpyDroid2I have one more reason to laugh at the US
07:39.24Liquid_InkKeep in mind Impy that the rest of us live in American client states.
07:40.16*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@host-147-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
07:41.13TechnobliteratorWell, we live on the same planet, and no way will Trump do anything about climate change now
07:41.15TechnobliteratorWe're done for
07:42.40Liquid_InkDon't fall into despair
07:44.23ImpyDroidTechnobliterator Liquid_Ink: Haven't you both been living in Reichs either way?
07:44.35ImpyDroidUK post-Brexit, Australia for a while
07:44.38Liquid_InkPretty true
07:44.53ImpyDroidI mean it is rich coming from a Russian accusing someone of being too right-wing
07:45.18ImpyDroidBut still Trump is part of a greater trend
07:45.43Liquid_InkIt's not that our governments are better, it's that the United States having that sort of government legitimises and rallies these peopl.e
07:46.11Liquid_InkActually if we look at the bright side, when Donald Trump fails to deliver on his anti-establishment policies it will ruin right-wing populism for a long while.
07:46.23TechnobliteratorAt least they're not going to rip up the Paris agreement
07:46.40TechnobliteratorI predict the planet has at least a decade left
07:46.43Technobliteratorthen it's done
07:47.55Liquid_InkYou should be more optimistic.
07:50.53TechnobliteratorThere's nothing to be optimistic about
07:51.39ImpyDroid>nothing to be optimistic about
07:51.43ImpyDroidWelcome to our world
07:51.53ImpyDroidДобро пожаловать в ад
07:53.53ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: I predict Trump will chicken out
07:54.04Liquid_InkThat would be interesting
07:54.21NeonPandathat would actually be quite interesting to be honest
07:54.23NeonPandaand very welcome
07:54.24ImpyDroidHe no longer lacks strings, as he did as a businessman funding his own campaign
07:55.04ImpyDroidNow he has to pander for all the elite in the White House and Wall-Street
07:55.12ImpyDroid*pander tl
07:55.14ImpyDroid*to
07:55.16NeonPandaI can envision a scenario in which that's the case, specifically the whole thing being essentially a publicity campaign
07:55.37ImpyDroidBesides America had weird or just idiotic presidents before
07:55.45ImpyDroidBush Jr., Reagan, etc
07:56.04*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
07:56.20WormydroidPopcorn
07:56.21ImpyDroidWormydroid: THE DARK LORD RISES
07:56.32NeonPandaI'm mostly concerned about Trump wanting higher militarisation in asia than anything else tbh
07:56.39WormydroidYou mean the neural parasites
07:56.55ImpyDroidHe probably has quite a few in his hair
07:57.15ImpyDroidNeonPanda: Well both Hill and Trump are militaristic anyway
07:57.17TechnobliteratorImp, we don't have time for Trump 2.0
07:57.21Technobliteratorclimate change is killing the planet
07:57.23TechnobliteratorWe're done for
07:57.23WormydroidI think his hair is one
07:57.36ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: My point is
07:57.43ImpyDroidTrump is not as powerful as we think
07:57.52TechnobliteratorYes he is
07:57.56TechnobliteratorParis agreement, ripped up
07:57.57Technobliteratorboom
07:57.58Technobliteratorplanet dead
07:58.00ImpyDroidAs President he will have to cater to all the elites
07:58.05ImpyDroidIn the country
07:58.12Technobliteratorand you think the elites are any better?
07:58.17ImpyDroid...True
07:58.20WormydroidA few other poiticians have similar parasites
07:58.33ImpyDroidBut some of his weirder plans won't come into fruition I am sure
07:58.40Charles_BotI'm still awake
07:58.46Charles_BotCareful
07:58.47ImpyDroidAlso America is not even the main perpetrator of climate change
07:59.31Charles_Bot2nd largest carbon emitter. 1st largest if you count that most of China's production is actually the US's production.
07:59.34TechnobliteratorDoesn't matter if the paris agreement is done
08:00.01ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: Yeah but with or without Drumppf, there is still China
08:00.33Charles_BotIf the US does nothing about CC, China doesn't do anything about CC
08:00.49Liquid_InkThe thing is, you're curling into a ball and despair and giving up on everything, and that's what the elite wants
08:01.33WormydroidThis guy makes the established elite feel threatened Liquid
08:01.44WormydroidNot that its good
08:01.45ImpyDroidThat is fair
08:01.55TechnobliteratorBut not threatened into acting on literally the biggest threat facing the planet
08:02.34Liquid_InkWormy: That is true, and we need to look at this as an opportunity
08:03.19WormydroidThey didn't anticipate his style of politics to be successful but it woke up some boiling undercurrents
08:03.19Liquid_InkI worded that poorly, but let me elaborate
08:03.36Liquid_InkYes, there is a boiling undercurrent against the establishment
08:04.01ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: but I welcome America turning into a burning wasteland
08:04.16Liquid_InkImpy: That's not helping
08:04.16TechnobliteratorIt will be the rest of the world with it, Imp
08:04.30ImpyDroidNot us
08:04.43Liquid_InkTrump was voted in by people scared of poverty, thinking that since he's something new it'll change things. Once he fails to deliver (he's there for himself, that's all), it will ruin the reputation of right-wing populism
08:04.56Charles_Bot270 electoral votes
08:04.58WormydroidCheck out https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperNormalisation
08:04.59Charles_BotThere we go
08:05.10Wormydroid275
08:05.18Charles_BotIk
08:05.25Charles_BotLimit is 270
08:05.33ImpyDroidWe will get a nice temperate climate and melting Siberian ice shall provide us with copious amounts of freshwater to distribute to you Westerners >:3
08:05.47ImpyDroidBut first it is time to BOW
08:05.54Charles_BotAlso fired and famines
08:05.58Charles_BotFires*
08:06.07ImpyDroidWe have that aplenty already
08:06.17WormydroidBrb
08:06.31Liquid_InkSeriously Impy you're not helping
08:06.44ImpyDroidI am not even sure if I am kidding or being serious
08:06.48ImpyDroidBut alright soz
08:07.04Charles_BotThat's not a good sign Impy
08:07.40ImpyDroidThat is because it does not concern me specifically so I am less serious than you obviously
08:07.43Liquid_InkSpeaking of elections, I hear the recent Russian Duma election had record low turnout
08:07.49ImpyDroidIndeed
08:08.01ImpyDroidThe levels of not giving a fuck have been abnormally high
08:08.40Charles_BotI mean
08:08.44Charles_BotThat makes sense
08:08.58Charles_BotIt's Russia in the 2010's
08:09.05Charles_BotWhat else did you expect
08:09.25TechnobliteratorI totally saw this coming
08:09.33TechnobliteratorI just absolutely knew it would happen in my gut
08:09.34Technobliteratorand yet
08:09.36Technobliteratorit's still so sad
08:10.05ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: I saw it coming but I was doubtful until the end
08:10.06Liquid_InkIt was probably all the non-United Russia voters giving up.
08:10.32Charles_BotThat's not how the Russian system works
08:10.34ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: We went from "YAY PUTIN" in 2014 to "whatever" in 2016
08:10.46Liquid_InkCharles: Oh?
08:11.33Charles_BotNon Kremlin-approved opposition parties are pretty much banned and non-Kremlin approved politicians suppressed
08:11.45Charles_BotRussia has only a token opposition
08:11.46ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: Not all of them
08:11.50ImpyDroidThere's PARNAS
08:11.55Charles_BotSo nothing to really vote for
08:12.04ImpyDroidBut yeah Navalny was not allowed to run for example
08:12.12Charles_Bot^
08:12.22ImpyDroidWe have Putin and these small token groups
08:12.51Charles_BotSo elections are ornamental at this point
08:12.58ImpyDroidSort of
08:13.02*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (1f6f6f86@gateway/web/freenode/ip.31.111.111.134)
08:13.11WormydroidHi
08:13.18Charles_BotOh?
08:14.08Liquid_InkBefore this recent election, United Russia only held onto a majority by four seats if I recall.
08:14.28ImpyDroidThere are four large parties
08:14.49ImpyDroidThey disagree on stuff like economical policy and the like but are all in cahoots with the establishment
08:14.54WormydroidCharles any possibility Brexit's surprise victory had any after shocks in swaying a bigger turn out for Trump?
08:15.07Charles_BotNo
08:15.08ImpyDroidWormydroid: I would say they are part of the same trend
08:15.35Charles_BotMore than that, similar demographic and economic forces
08:15.57ImpyDroidI can see why both movements won
08:16.06ImpyDroidRadicals are more interested in voting
08:16.16Charles_BotSomewhat similar social and national forces to a lesser extent
08:16.38ImpyDroidSo there might be more people who were for Remain but they did not care as much as Leavers
08:16.43ImpyDroidAnd many of them did not show up
08:17.11WormydroidBut what about getting people who wouldn't otherwise vote believing they could defeat whqtcthey perceive as establishment politics?
08:17.49Charles_BotIt's a bit more complicated than that. Polls showed the two neck-and-neck
08:17.59Charles_BotIn the lead up to Brexit
08:18.24ImpyDroidAre you answering to Wormy or to me?
08:18.43WormydroidWell, I'm sure it'd only be a small contribution, if at all. But Brexit surprised everyone
08:18.48Charles_BotA bit of both, but it's also 3 am
08:18.57Charles_BotSo did this
08:19.08ImpyDroidLook at the right, the right is rising everywhere
08:19.19ImpyDroidThe quite radical right too
08:19.23ImpyDroidThe REICH IS RISING
08:19.37Charles_BotImpy, stahp
08:19.50WormydroidYeah, but what I'm asking is, could events like this empower them?
08:20.13Liquid_InkIt will, until Trump fails to deliver.
08:20.32WormydroidSurely things like Brexit do carry aftershocks
08:20.39Charles_BotIn Europe, yes. Brexit carries great symbolic power for other states with symbolic power
08:20.40Liquid_InkOh, that.
08:20.44Charles_BotIt's like suicides
08:21.17WormydroidYeah
08:21.26Charles_BotThey happen in waves because when one person goes over the edge, it suddenly becomes a conceivable reality for those around them
08:22.02Charles_BotIn the United States, Brexit was a blip in the narratives of the campaign
08:23.06WormydroidTrump did try when he invited Farage to speak
08:23.29Charles_BotI didn't even know that happened
08:23.46Charles_BotKeep in mind that you're living in the U.K. media bubble
08:24.13WormydroidYeah, check out Farage's speeches at Trump conventions, and his interviewsvwith Fox
08:24.45WormydroidHis message to the American voters was that they could beat the system "if we could"
08:25.17WormydroidBut you're right UK media would have inflated the prominance
08:25.25WormydroidProminence
08:25.34Charles_BotRight, but if it was important in the US I would have heard about it. Trump has an army of surrogates, most of them with greater name recognition in the US than Farage, and none of them make it into the grander narratives of the campaign
08:26.22WormydroidBrexit is powerful message though
08:26.46Charles_BotNot really, most Americans have forgotten about it already
08:26.48Charles_BotMoved on
08:27.01TechnobliteratorMuch like his sexual assault tapes, apparently
08:27.07Charles_BotIt's hugely important to the U.K., absolutely, and to Europe
08:27.33Charles_BotBut again, we're talking about how Americans see themselves, and the stories they tell about themselves
08:27.35WormydroidOur influence in the world isn't out yet!  Jk
08:27.44Wormydroidevil brit laughs
08:27.56TechnobliteratorFrankly, Trump gave his party a gift
08:28.02Technobliteratorby making them the populist party
08:28.06Technobliteratorinstead of the establishment party
08:28.40WormydroidBut okay, I'll accrpt that Brexit was quickly forgotten even if Trump pushed its narrative a couple if times
08:29.13Charles_BotBut the point is that nobody here knows how a president Trump will act. And I mean nobody. This would have been true of a President-elect Clinton, and was true of a President-Elect Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, etc
08:29.33Charles_BotFundamentally, Presidents act differently when in office than on the campaign
08:30.03Charles_BotObama was a liberal on the campaign and a moderate in office, to give a horribly oversimplified example
08:30.11Technobliteratorit's extremely obvious it will be Bush 2.0
08:30.22Charles_BotNo, it's not
08:30.22Technobliteratoryou expect more groesque wars and likely another 08 crash
08:30.28WormydroidI'm think Congress could be a barrier for him when most Republicans hate him
08:30.35Charles_Bot...
08:30.38Charles_BotGuys
08:30.44Technobliteratormaybe Pence will make it more socially conservative, but otherwise, it'll be Bush again
08:31.04Technobliteratoralso, it's worse, because nothing will be done on climate change
08:31.08Charles_BotYou're saying things with the certainty of fact
08:31.13Technobliteratorie literally the most important issue on the planet by far
08:31.14TechnobliteratorWe're done for
08:31.19Charles_BotWe don't know these things
08:31.20Technobliteratorthanks, Democrats
08:32.01Charles_BotNo, we cannot expect any of these things >.<
08:32.20Charles_BotUnless you can see into the future and tell me with absolute certainty what has happened.
08:32.33Liquid_InkIf you just curl into a ball and give up then you are as complicit as any of Trump's diehard supporters.
08:32.33Charles_BotIn which case I will concede
08:32.38TechnobliteratorCharles, he said on the campaign trail he would get rid of the EPA and rip up the Paris climate agreement, and every policy on his platform is a Bush tax cut policy
08:32.45Liquid_InkA big enough protest can stop any act of tyranny.
08:32.53TechnobliteratorNot to mention, "when you go take out these terrorists, you have to go after their families"
08:33.05Technobliteratorno to mention, Mike Pence is the actual guy in charge, who is basically Dick Cheney
08:33.12TechnobliteratorIt's extremely obvious which way this will go
08:33.15Charles_BotObama said he would close Guantanamo, revolutionize American foreign policy, pull out of the Middle East, etc
08:33.32Charles_BotAgain, the historical record isn't on your side on this one
08:34.11Technobliteratoryeah, because once he got in, he was too cowardly to oppose the Bush neocons
08:34.19Technobliteratorwho had put that in place
08:34.34Charles_BotNeocons don't... exist... anymore
08:34.57Charles_BotThat's an anachronous statement
08:35.13Charles_BotThere isn't a 1:1 correlation between what a candidate says on the trail and what he will do in office. It's more like a 1:Z correlation
08:35.33Charles_BotIn that the difference is not in terms of scale, but in terms of kind
08:35.39TechnobliteratorI mean, it's extremely clear based on who they pick in their cabinet
08:35.45Technobliteratorand we already know who he'll pick
08:35.50Technobliteratormore Bush neocons
08:35.57Charles_BotIf you listened to his concession speech, you'd see that already
08:36.01Charles_BotAgain
08:36.03Charles_BotTechno
08:36.09Charles_BotNeocons don't exist anymore
08:37.31ImpyDroidDo not be such a definition Nazi hom
08:37.35ImpyDroid*hon
08:37.45Charles_BotThe term neoconservative is historically located in the Bush administration to refer to a tightly-knit faction of conservatives with muscular foreign policy outlooks and a prestige-driven worldview
08:37.59ImpyDroidAnd we are not political scientists to know that
08:38.08Charles_BotThen don't use the term
08:38.09*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (59c24729@gateway/web/freenode/ip.89.194.71.41)
08:38.15ImpyDroidShe does not use the term
08:38.19ImpyDroidShe uses the word
08:38.20Charles_BotAnd don't wield it with the certainty of fact
08:38.32ImpyDroidThere are words, and there are terms derived from words
08:38.43TechnobliteratorI mean, the foreign policy has basically been the same grotesque foreign policy since Bush
08:38.46Technobliteratorit'll only get worse now
08:38.53ImpyDroidShe uses the word in its generic meaning, and you can understand her
08:39.02ImpyDroidSo it does not matter if she uses proper definition
08:39.04Charles_BotIf Techno were to argue this in front of my political science classes, she'd get laughed off the stage
08:39.17ImpyDroidThat is called the "naive picture of the world" in linguistics
08:39.25ImpyDroidYes but we are not political scientists
08:39.36Charles_BotAnd sent back to intro to American history
08:39.41ImpyDroidWe are not delving deep here
08:39.57TechnobliteratorWell, if I had said Trump will win, I would've been laughed off the stage
08:39.57WormydroidWe shoukd listen to our resident political scientist however
08:39.59Technobliteratorand I was right
08:41.02Charles_BotAnyone who says with absolute certainty that one candidate or another is going to win isn't going to be taken seriously
08:41.47WormydroidAlso, you had a lucky guess.  Most predictions about the future, especially those without explanation and evidence, are prophesy
08:41.53GhelaeEven astrology makes correct predictions sometimes.
08:42.32Charles_BotEven going into this week, I was always including "ifs" in my analyses, and scrawling in a hundred things which we know could go wrong to cast doubt on the results that our analytical, theoretical, and empirical tools are giving us
08:44.27Charles_BotNate Silver, one of the most reputed statisticians in political science whom nobody ignores, kept reminding everyone that Trump had a 30% chance of winning
08:44.37Charles_BotAnd going into great detail how that might happen
08:44.54ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: I remember this guy
08:45.08ImpyDroidI think his predicted chance of winning was even smaller though?
08:45.12ImpyDroidLike 20%
08:45.37Charles_BotIt fluctuated dynamically as polls came in, it's a whole model
08:45.52Charles_BotThe model is now frozen around 70-30
08:47.11Technobliteratorwell, irrespective of who won
08:47.13Charles_BotMost other outlets and aggregators had Trump's chances of winning at 10%, but Silver had come up with a new set of innovations this cycle which expected polling errors across similar states to be correlated.
08:47.18Technobliteratorforeign policy would've just been Bush's again anyway
08:47.26Technobliteratorit's everything else I am sad about
08:47.40WormydroidExplain to us why
08:47.49Charles_BotNo, again, we have no way of knowing that
08:47.59Charles_BotMe or her?
08:48.10WormydroidTechno
08:48.15Technobliteratorit's obvious, Wormy
08:48.19Technobliteratoryou just need to look at it
08:48.21Technobliteratorit's the same thing
08:48.25Charles_Bot(It's not)
08:48.27Technobliteratormore torture, more ridiculous interventionism
08:48.53Technobliteratorany foreign policy that isn't "pull out of the middle east completely and stop arming the region" at this point is just irrational
08:49.00Charles_Bot(There's nothing obvious about any of this)
08:49.22TechnobliteratorObama's foreign policy was only better than Bush's on two points
08:49.26Technobliteratorthe Cuba deal and the Iran deal
08:49.29Technobliteratoreverything else was the same thing
08:49.40Charles_BotUh
08:50.08Charles_BotThat's only kind of true, you're drawing the wrong conclusions and lacking a lot of information on that point
08:50.09WormydroidThis is your internal dialogue though, not an explanarion built from analysis and evidence.  Like I saud about explanationless predictions being worse
08:50.14ImpyDroidJust gotta say, I do not see a reason why Trump would be less militarist
08:50.20ImpyDroidSo for once Jo is right
08:50.29ImpyDroidThere is always a maybe but she is probably right
08:50.43TechnobliteratorI mean, he had drone strikes which kill civillians 90% of the time
08:50.44Charles_BotBecause the United States is not militarist....
08:50.56Technobliteratorand kept up a bloated military budget
08:51.08ImpyDroidhence *less* militarist
08:51.43Charles_BotAlright, evidently my defining what that actually means doesn't help
08:51.53Charles_BotWhat do you mean by militarist?
08:53.04Liquid_InkPerhaps jingoistic is a better phrase?
08:53.37Charles_BotMaybe, though I'm going to need that defined as well
08:53.50WormydroidLike Charles said, his personality may and probably will have to change aftet campaign
08:53.52Liquid_InkActually, the US counts as both
08:54.30ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: Having a proactive interventionist  foreign policy
08:54.33ImpyDroidThat is what I mean
08:54.36Liquid_InkMilitarism means they believe they need a strong military and be prepared to use it aggressively to defend their policies. Which is true.
08:54.46ImpyDroidMaybe this is not militarist per some precise defintiom
08:54.52Charles_BotOkay, that I can work with
08:54.54ImpyDroidBut this is what we meant
08:55.04Liquid_InkJingoism is an aggressive foreign policiy; bombings and invasions
08:55.19ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: Isn't it radical patriotism?
08:55.20Technobliteratorthey basically use it to be terrorists
08:55.28Technobliteratorkilling civillians 90% of the time
08:55.37Technobliteratorthen wondering why Islamic terrorists exist
08:55.44Charles_BotAgain Techno
08:55.53Charles_BotYou're missing so much of the bigger picture
08:56.04TechnobliteratorPlease explain to me what part of what I just said is wrong
08:56.19NeonPandaAnyone else had an imaginary button of popcorn handy since Charles and Techno started going at it?
08:56.19TechnobliteratorIf you kill civillians 90% of the time with ridiculous drone strikes, what do you expect to happen?
08:56.24ImpyDroidThen again Trump promised to have a less proactive policy
08:56.27NeonPandabucket*
08:56.29NeonPandanot button
08:57.03Charles_BotBecause that's a common sense argument relying on decontextualized facts
08:57.18Charles_BotNot an actual foreign policy
08:57.27TechnobliteratorWhat context is needed?
08:57.39TechnobliteratorDrone strikes kill civillians 90% of the time
08:57.44TechnobliteratorYou can't complicate that further
08:57.46TechnobliteratorIt's just criminal
08:58.26ImpyDroidYeah but they are not the only people doing that
08:58.29ImpyDroidWe do that too
08:58.33ImpyDroidSaudis doo
08:58.35ImpyDroid*do
08:58.36Liquid_InkIt's still wrong.
08:58.39TechnobliteratorThat doesn't make those governments better, Imp
08:58.43Technobliterator"They do it too" is not an argument
08:58.54Charles_BotYou can locate drones in Obama'a foreign policy, given life by something much bigger that is -actually- characteristic about how Obama has been forced to use American power: retrenchment
08:59.03ImpyDroidI am not defending Americans hur
08:59.07ImpyDroidJust saying
08:59.17*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid_ (80f30290@gateway/web/freenode/ip.128.243.2.144)
08:59.21Charles_BotNeither am I, nor am I defending Trump
08:59.49Charles_BotI'm just defending what political science is able to know and what it doesn't
09:00.01NeonPandaI'm just finding this rather entertaining because for once I'm not involved,
09:00.02ImpyDroidSo Charles is trying to say that America is growing weaker
09:00.06NeonPandait's quite hilarious from the outside perspective
09:00.08ImpyDroidIn terms of foreign policy
09:00.29Charles_BotGod damnit why did I think throwing that word out would help
09:00.31Charles_BotOkay
09:00.33Charles_BotFuck
09:00.36Charles_BotLet's do this
09:00.41NeonPandait's getting better and better
09:00.53ImpyDroidNo I mean it makes sense
09:00.58NeonPandanow I see why my friends stir me up so much, I'm usually the Charles in this equation
09:01.05Charles_BotAmerican foreign policy tends to oscillate between two kinds of presidencies
09:01.25Charles_BotRetrenchers on one hand, maximalists on the other
09:01.35Liquid_Ink"conquer" presidencies and "occupy" presidencies.
09:01.47Wormydroid_Brb lecture
09:02.05Charles_BotNot quite
09:02.15Charles_BotI'll explain in detail
09:04.50Liquid_InkHonestly I can't wait to see if he can actually build the wall
09:04.59ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: "Fuck let's turtle" and "FUCK EVERYONE AHAHAHA"
09:05.55Charles_BotThis is a quirk of the American psychology, society, culture, institutions, etc, why this is the case actually isn't that important (that's a whole other topic), but  it has gone something like this since the Cold War: (1) There is a massive crisis in American foreign policy. It is a stone in the beehive moment, causing (2) the whole of American society to
09:05.55Charles_Botobsessively reevaluate everything it knows about power, the world, its own doctrines, etc, and to come to the conclusion that (3) this new challenge needs to be addressed decisively and immediately with all of the resources and strength that the US can muster
09:06.01NeonPandacan it be built? absolutely. would building it be both counterproductive and up-fucking everything in the process? yeah
09:07.08Liquid_InkHow will he build it with tax cuts? Would he actually intimidate Mexico into paying for it.
09:07.45NeonPandaI never said it could practically be built, I said that it could be built, as in it's physically possible to build
09:08.10Charles_BotIt's pedal to the metal, all chips on the table, all or nothing. Maximalist presidents are acutely aware of the short attention spans of their American publics, so they go in full force to try and get the job done quickly, well, and without delay. Most importantly, they realize that if the job is going to get done at all, the US is going to have to do it
09:08.10Charles_Botitself
09:08.52Charles_BotHistorically, allies haven't been on board with American maximalist programs, leading the United States to go it alone
09:08.55Liquid_InkNeon: But economically speaking. Whether it could physically exist was never in question.
09:09.08Charles_BotFollowing me so far, or are we really stuck on the wall thing?
09:09.21NeonPandaoh economically speaking there's no practical way to get it done
09:09.27NeonPandaCharles: we're having a side convo
09:09.27Charles_BotYep
09:09.35Charles_BotWe're stuck on the wall thing
09:10.10ImpyDroidI do follow
09:10.18NeonPandarude much?
09:10.18Charles_BotTechnobliterator?
09:11.21TechnobliteratorI follow
09:12.06Liquid_InkCharles: Sorry, I was listening but I was talking while waiting for you to finish.
09:12.16Charles_BotAlright. Presidents with this approach: Truman, Kennedy, Johnson (despite himself), Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush
09:12.20Charles_BotNo problem, sorry
09:12.48Charles_BotNow what tends to happen with these periods is that the US overdoes it
09:14.31Charles_BotIt gets overcommitted to something. Whether it's the Korean or Vietnam wars, or nationbuilding in Iraq and Afghanistan, these presidents find themselves trapped by their own maximalism, overextended, and totally on an unsustainable and destructive course
09:14.50ImpyDroidSo it is the vicious circle of Americans being idiots
09:15.06ImpyDroid*a vicious
09:15.43Charles_BotWell the thing is that, in its grand strokes, American foreign policy has been extremely successful and consistent from 1945 to now
09:16.08ImpyDroidNot going to argue with that
09:17.14Charles_BotBut there are snares and traps which drain American resources, prestige, and self-confidence. Further, American thinking about various issues, crises, and the nature and function of American power, is what changes dramatically from phase to phase
09:17.34Charles_BotIt's a lot about perception and how the nation perceives itself
09:17.57Charles_BotThat's where retrenchers come in with names like Eisenhower, Nixon, Carter, and Obama
09:20.06Charles_BotRetrenchers believe that America is stuck in a quagmire of its own creation, that its arrogance and overreach has put it in a position where its bleeding resource And goodwill with no end in sight. The retrencher comes in and ends wars and occupations, pulls back American investments and power, and attempts to put American foreign policy on surer, more
09:20.06Charles_Botsustainable footing
09:21.04ImpyDroidAaand? We are not sure to which camp Trump will belong
09:21.14Charles_BotThey have a very clear distrust for overt uses of power and will always try the cheaper option, relying on allies, diplomacy, goodwill, careful planning, careful balancing, and cheap power tools
09:21.36Charles_BotThey cut military budgets and attempt to give the US room to recover
09:21.39Charles_BotBut in so doing
09:21.44Charles_BotThey overdo it
09:21.47ImpyDroidAnd he will not be less militarist than Obama for sure
09:22.07ImpyDroidSo our point stands despite you providing greater insight on the situation
09:22.30Technobliteratorso, Obama was a retrencher, just not nearly enough of one
09:22.42Charles_BotAnd as the years wear on, they become too reluctant to use power, too withdrawn, too bound in the web of retrenchment that they created for themselves
09:22.55Technobliteratorboth candidates promised to be maximalists, though?
09:23.06Charles_BotAnd this causes a crisis in American thinking as they begin to believe themselves to be declining
09:23.09Charles_BotAnd bam
09:23.24Charles_BotIn comes the maximalist to transform everything and the cycle begins anew
09:23.44Charles_BotYep, both Clinton and Trump were maximalists
09:24.16Charles_BotAnd Obama is a retrencher, and was too much of one
09:24.43Charles_BotAmerican foreign policy is pretty much stretched to its limit right now and completely and totally bound up in its own blunders
09:25.25TechnobliteratorHow was Obama too much of a retrencher when he had drone strikes that kill civillians 90% of the time?
09:25.44TechnobliteratorAnd I thought the Iran deal and the Cuba deal were successful
09:25.49Technobliteratorof course, the Iran deal is done now, but yeah
09:26.11Charles_BotBut I bring in these conceptual categories to make something abundantly clear: retrenchers and maximalists both use military power in order to protect the same interests, the same commitments, the same global system of security and economic exchange that everyone depends on
09:26.29Charles_BotExcept they do it very differently
09:27.45Charles_BotBush did it (dumly, we agree on this), with full-on invasions and concerted uses of all the different power tools in his arsenal. Obama was forced to maintain the same alliances with fewer tools and less tolerance to use them.
09:28.09Charles_BotHence, drones, in order to keep fighting the war on terror
09:29.08Charles_BotEisenhower tried to use nuclear weapons in order to defend peripheral interests when he couldn't use conventional military power because it was too expensive in lives and materiel
09:29.48Liquid_InkWhere did he want to use them?
09:29.59Liquid_InkDidn't Nixon want to nuke North Vietnam?
09:30.16Charles_BotI'm not sure about that
09:30.31Charles_BotLet me get a book off my shelf and I'll check for you
09:33.15Wormydroid_Test
09:34.14Charles_BotFound the page
09:37.13Charles_BotHe used them to keep the islands of Quemoy from falling to the PRC
09:38.10Charles_BotIn other words, to defend Taiwan
09:38.16Liquid_InkOh so he didn't use them as in nuke anyone; he just waggled them around threateningly?
09:38.27Charles_BotOh of course
09:38.30ImpyDroidDuh
09:38.43Charles_BotThe United States has only used nukes twice and that's in 1945
09:39.43Charles_BotAnd he considered waggling them around for many, many more occasions than other presidents
09:39.53Liquid_InkI knew he didn't actually use them, I was just confused on your wording
09:40.04Charles_BotAlright, my bad
09:40.10Charles_BotApologies
09:40.51Technobliteratorwell, very likely waggling them around now
09:41.10Charles_BotNot really, that's no longer a thing
09:41.28Charles_BotObama lives, or at least tries to live, in a post-power politics world
09:42.04Charles_BotAnd he's, in his mind, defending that from forces who are trying to bring back parochialism and zero-sum logic into the 21st century
09:42.47Wormydroid_Was now :>
09:43.00Charles_BotHe's still president
09:43.11Charles_BotTrump won't be sworn in until January
09:43.21Charles_BotTrump is President-Elect
09:43.21Wormydroid_Right
09:44.33Charles_BotSo ultimately, the point I was trying to make is that there's a larger picture here that make all of these pieces fit and make sense
09:47.26*** join/#sporewiki OluapPlayer (b164faee@gateway/web/freenode/ip.177.100.250.238)
09:47.27*** mode/#sporewiki [+o OluapPlayer] by ChanServ
09:47.38Wormydroid_Hi
09:47.47OluapPlayerHi
09:47.59Charles_BotAnd it's a very useful theory for understanding how trump might approach the presidency with a different way of thinking about the US's role in the world. But maximalists are also incredibly different from each other. Kennedy implemented maximalism "with a backdoor," having absolutely no plan but to keep all of his options open, especially the ability to
09:47.59Charles_Botretreat. Johnson was a retrencher at heart, but was cornered by his advisors into continuing the Vietnam war with every resource he could throw at it. Reagan's innovation was to imagine that the Cold War could be won, not just fought indefinitely.
09:48.24OluapPlayerI knew I was gonna gonna arrive to this
09:48.28OluapPlayerdon't know what I expected
09:48.38Liquid_InkIs it a problem?
09:49.01OluapPlayerTo me, yes
09:49.20Charles_BotBush began as a retrencher, but emerged a unilateralist almost out of principle, as if American prestige depended on its ability to act freely
09:49.27OluapPlayerIf anyone needs me I'll be on Steam
09:49.50Technobliterator...:V
09:50.10Wormydroid_Hm
09:50.37Charles_BotThe theory doesn't tell us how he will act as president, or what policies he will implement. But it does hint to a general direction as to how he will think about American power
09:50.57Charles_BotAnd the problems facing it
09:51.00Charles_BotAnd that's in an expansive way
09:51.36TechnobliteratorHoly fuck, Trump's being respectful in his victory speech
09:51.38Technobliteratorand calling for unity
09:51.40Technobliteratorthis is surreal
09:51.43Charles_BotYep
09:52.08Charles_BotThat's why I'm telling you that the presidency is fundamentally different from running for it
09:52.14Charles_BotNow you need to govern
09:52.31Charles_BotAnd governing is very, very different from running for an office
09:52.54ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: Show me
09:53.04ImpyDroidAnd yeah now he is going to chicken out
09:53.18TechnobliteratorI still doubt that he will be anything other than Bush 2.0, but
09:53.18Liquid_InkI think it's worth keeping in mind that while he got in on an anti-establishment message, as a corporate billionaire he is very much part of the establishment. A rogue element, but still part of it.
09:53.22Technobliteratorhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgaiYTjHhpI
09:53.25TechnobliteratorTYT's reaction
09:53.36Charles_BotOh god
09:53.39Charles_BotTYT
09:54.11TechnobliteratorI'm sure there's a video on another channel though
09:54.28Charles_BotI'm not sure the "establishment" has much value as an analytical tool
09:55.41Charles_BotIt's a label, a generalized imaginary that has been created and applied to candidates, or appropriated by candidates. It has symbolic power and means something to a popular audience
09:56.00Charles_BotBut as an actual analytic tool, it's blunt and hides more than it reveals
09:56.35TechnobliteratorAnd yet, they were far closer to being correct than the vast majority of outlets
09:57.29ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: ...Are you watching Young Turks
09:57.44TechnobliteratorI am watching their reaction to the speech, yes
09:57.50Charles_Bot... keeping in mind that the major outlets (barring the infotainment ones) were going off of what we in PS were telling them
09:58.07Technobliteratoryeah, incorrectly
09:58.37Charles_BotAnd I explained to you earlier why Trump was able to win while only being predicted to win 30% of the time
09:59.29Charles_BotWhat's important is the methodology, sources, and focus of a particular outlet/news source
09:59.42ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: Oh God he is so pathetic here
09:59.54ImpyDroidIt is like they sucked off all the fun from him
10:00.15Technobliteratorit's so sad if his whole presidency is like this
10:00.23Technobliteratorthere won't even be entertainment value
10:00.33Charles_Bot...
10:00.38Charles_BotI give up
10:00.42Technobliteratorliterally the only positive
10:00.43Technobliteratoris gone
10:00.50Charles_BotTechno is irrational
10:00.51ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: Hm?
10:01.13Charles_BotNo way to persuade her with rational arguments or evidence
10:02.34Charles_BotAgain. There is reason to give Trump the benefit of the doubt.
10:02.45TechnobliteratorI mean, I was right twice
10:02.48Charles_BotHe is the legitimately elected president of the United States
10:02.52Technobliteratorwhen no one listened to me
10:03.01Charles_BotThat means nothing, Techno
10:03.08Technobliteratoryeah, just like it meant nothing earlier
10:03.12TechnobliteratorTrump would never win, right?
10:03.20Charles_BotI never said that
10:03.44Charles_BotNobody who knows what they're talking about would ever say that
10:04.10Charles_BotNobody would ever say with certainty that he would win either
10:04.28TechnobliteratorI'm just past the point of being talked down to
10:04.31Technobliteratorby literally everyone
10:04.34Technobliteratorwhen I was right twice
10:04.44Charles_BotYou're in my field Techno
10:05.17*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@host-33-158-66-217.spbmts.ru)
10:05.43Charles_BotIf I tried to tell you how to code a linked list, you would be slapping me around because I haven't the slightest clue what I'm doing
10:05.57Charles_BotAnd I shouldn't be telling a CS person how to do their job
10:06.37Charles_BotEven if I did manage to somehow code a linked list twice
10:08.10TechnobliteratorI would not be slapping you around even if you didn't code a linked list once
10:08.26TechnobliteratorI don't believe in talking down to people
10:08.45TechnobliteratorI have been guilty of it in the past, and regret it
10:08.47Charles_BotBut you would be teaching me how to do it, right?
10:08.58Charles_BotAnd would expect me to listen
10:09.12TechnobliteratorIf you wanted to learn, I would
10:09.39TechnobliteratorAnyway, I am going to go to the gym now to cool off
10:09.45Charles_BotAnd I would be right to listen because you would have a lot to teach me
10:09.46TechnobliteratorI apologise for frustrating you
10:10.00Technobliteratorbut this thing stressed me out a lot
10:10.07Charles_BotMe too
10:11.22Charles_BotIn any case, all I wanted to say is that there's reason to give Trump the benefit of the doubt at this moment in time
10:11.58TechnobliteratorYou were right, I was being irrational, deliberately
10:12.12TechnobliteratorI am expecting the worst to happen so I don't get too disappointed when it does
10:12.16TechnobliteratorIt's how my pessimism works
10:12.22Charles_BotI used to do that too
10:12.35Charles_BotYou're never disappointed, always surprised
10:13.02Charles_BotMakes a grim-seeming world that much more exciting, or at least not as depressing
10:13.02Technobliteratoranyway, I'll speak later
10:13.49Charles_BotSorry for speaking down to you, it wasn't my intention
10:14.29Charles_BotHe's the president elect of the United States, who won in a free and fair election, and who declared his intention to unify not only the Republican Party, but the nation, and has done something incredible which is to declare his intention to work with those who snubbed him during the race
10:14.41Charles_BotI accept that he won, fair and square
10:15.43Charles_BotAnd that's how our system works, and it's the only way it can work
10:16.39Charles_BotUntil he royally screws up and breaks it, which is a distinct possibility, I accept him
10:17.06Charles_BotEven though I voted rather pointedly for the other gal
10:17.10Charles_BotI hope that makes sense?
10:18.35Charles_BotImpyDroid2?
10:20.10*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (1f718722@gateway/web/freenode/ip.31.113.135.34)
10:23.15*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@host-119-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
10:25.57Charles_Bot"As the realization worked its way around the planet that Donald J. Trump will become the next president of the United States, global investors reacted as if the world had caught fire."
10:26.04Charles_BotThis on the other hand
10:26.35ImpyDroidCharles_Bot: Yeah I do not argue with that
10:29.52Charles_BotI'm going to lose hundreds of dollars aren't I
10:32.30WormydroidI'm more worried about a loss of unity, liberal and tolerant values in the Anglosphere and West, while tensions rise in Russia.  I don't know what will happen, whether it will get worse or better, but that isn't reassuring
10:32.46Wormydroid*rise with Russia
10:37.05WormydroidBrb
10:45.24*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (1f4243f9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.31.66.67.249)
11:01.55*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@195.19.236.70)
11:02.57ImpyDroid2Wormydroid: Did you get my message?
11:10.04*** join/#sporewiki Wormy_ (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
11:10.20Wormy_hi
11:18.12*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@195.19.236.70)
11:19.23ImpyDroidWormy_: Just curious, were anyone in your family watching the elections?
11:23.57Wormy_<PROTECTED>
11:25.00Wormy_"Year of bad hair styles" http://imgur.com/gallery/gQprsKo
11:26.25Wormy_Most of my family are quite working class style conservative
11:27.03Wormy_though I've been brought up quite liberal / anarchistically
11:30.10Wormy_although we laugh at lefties sometimes
11:40.52*** join/#sporewiki Hachiman (5afe3ed4@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.254.62.212)
11:41.04HachimanCAN'T STUMP
11:42.14Liquid_InkHello
11:42.26TechnobliteratorWell, Hachi, your guy won :o
11:42.52HachimanWish I'd made bets now hur
11:43.15HachimanI wouldn't call him "my guy" so much as "the lesser of two evils" although that part is subjective for many people
11:43.42WallriosHachiman: The madman that will not touch my country
11:43.50WallriosThat is what he is for me
11:44.20HachimanMeanwhile Hillary was looking for an excuse to stir shit with Russia
11:44.52TechnobliteratorFair enough
11:45.02TechnobliteratorSo, good news, no Russian work
11:45.03Technobliteratorwar*
11:45.07*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@host-55-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
11:45.09TechnobliteratorBad news, climate change
11:45.20ImpyDroidYeah that is bad
11:45.44ImpyDroidsjsj
11:46.05HachimanThere are SJWs and libtards parading in the streets
11:46.09*** join/#sporewiki Worm_hair (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
11:46.23TechnobliteratorWell, one could argue that a Russian war would be worse for climate change, I guess?
11:46.42HachimanOnly if it went nuclear
11:46.50TechnobliteratorAlso, I will state again I hate dismissive terms like that, but eh
11:47.36HachimanAlright; there are people protesting in the street "Fuck Donald Trump", which certainly shows off how mature and ready for democracy they are
11:47.37ImpyDroidHachiman: Makes sense
11:47.46ImpyDroidI mean they show their protest
11:47.49ImpyDroidThey have the right to
11:47.56ImpyDroidMaybe a bit silly but they do
11:48.22HachimanI wouldn't be surprised if we see an online petition to call for a second election soon
11:48.29HachimanIt was the same with Brexit
11:49.02Worm_hairhttp://imgur.com/gallery/tk0YD
11:49.19WallriosHachiman: kek
11:49.24WallriosThen again, if Hill won
11:49.31WallriosThere would be protests too
11:49.35WallriosPerhaps even more violent
11:50.00HachimanHonestly, American liberals and leftists and whatnot are some of the most aggressive people around right now
11:51.08WallriosYeah but at least they do not have guns
11:51.10HachimanAnd they lump everybody who voted for Trump as being misogynistic, racist, and xenophobic
11:51.18HachimanThey're Americans; of course they have guns
11:51.23Worm_hairhttps://twitter.com/AmandaMarcotte/status/796032737857699841/photo/1
11:51.25*** join/#sporewiki Gaseous_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
11:51.28WallriosLess guns than Trump supporters
11:51.38Gaseous_InkWhat did I miss
11:51.57Gaseous_InkI lost connection when Hachi called Trump the lesser of two evils
11:52.19HachimanJust me bringing up the fact Hillary's supporters are protesting in the streets right now
11:52.27HachimanCalling for Trump's blood
11:52.44WallriosThat is interesting
11:52.45Gaseous_InkI see
11:52.57WallriosTBH I do not understand why you guys are all so fussed about it
11:53.02WallriosWe are not in America
11:53.19HachimanNo but the UK is allied to the US; plus it's entertaining to watch
11:53.27Gaseous_InkImpy, we live in American client states.
11:53.29WallriosSo am I but I am not fussed
11:53.31Gaseous_InkI explained this.
11:53.39TechnobliteratorHachiman, my bad, I thought you were talking about different protestors
11:53.41WallriosI am not having a stroke
11:53.44TechnobliteratorNo, I agree that those guys are stupid
11:53.50WallriosNor being angry
11:54.00WallriosFor once I am the chillest person in the room
11:54.05Gaseous_InkNoice
11:54.14HachimanI'm honestly more relieved than anything
11:54.22TechnobliteratorI had a discussion the other day where people said the Republicans should've rigged the primary so Trump lost, and that there should've been no referendum on the EU
11:54.23WallriosI am a bit sad
11:54.24TechnobliteratorI lost it completely
11:54.25WallriosIt was fun
11:54.29Technobliteratorthey're basically arguing against democracy
11:54.41HachimanAye
11:54.46WallriosNow the great fun times are over
11:55.08WallriosWe will no longer see a crazy old man shouting populist rhetoric
11:55.09Gaseous_InkNow come the great fun times of seeing him shirk his campaign promises.
11:55.14Wallrios^ That
11:55.21WallriosThe guy ain't going to be the same
11:55.26HachimanI at least want a wall
11:55.29WallriosHe is going to be all serious and reserved
11:55.37WallriosSame here
11:55.41TechnobliteratorI mean, I kind of hope he only lasts a time
11:55.43Technobliteratora term
11:55.48WallriosLet us see if he builds one
11:56.09Gaseous_InkThere are fifty million voters waiting for Trump to lift them out of poverty, and going to realise he's only there for himself. It's my hope this will totally defeat right-wing populism world wide
11:56.10WallriosDamn this year was fun
11:56.13Worm_hairI was morbidly curious to see a Trump victory, tbh
11:56.15HachimanIt's not gonna affect the American economy none because he's gonna make those Mexicans pay for it
11:56.24Technobliteratorthat, or the Democrats wisen up, get actually good senate candidates, and then we have SOME hope and prayer that cliamte change is fixed
11:56.37WallriosBrexit, the American elections, all that
11:56.53WallriosHell the last few years were really  interesting
11:57.08WallriosBut also terrifying
11:57.31Worm_hair^
11:58.11HachimanI reckon Trump actually won the Presidency through the use of his occult connections and the implementation of meme magic
11:58.11Gaseous_InkPauline Hanson (Australia's local fascist) is having a party in parliament right now.
11:58.46HachimanAlso, Oluap's not going to be on today specifically because of the inevitable talk about the topic of Trump
11:58.59Gaseous_InkYeah, he showed up earlier.
11:59.09WallriosHachiman: KEK BE PRAISED
11:59.11Gaseous_InkHe said he'll be on steam if you want him.
11:59.16WallriosTO HIM WE OFFER OUR MEMES
11:59.22HachimanI have him on Skype so
11:59.32WallriosYou have Kek on Skype?
11:59.37Worm_hairLast couple of years made politics interesting for me
11:59.47HachimanWallrios: GIVE GRACE TO OUR LORD AND SAVIOR, PEPE THE FROG
11:59.57WallriosLAILLAHA IL KEK
12:00.08HachimanTHE SYMBOL OF WHITE SUPREMACY AND THE ETERNAL ICON OF THE AMERICAN PATRIARCHY
12:00.09WallriosTHERE IS NO GOD BUT KEK
12:00.13Gaseous_InkSeriously, Trump won because he used pro-worker rhetoric, and spoke to all the small towns, while Hillary passed them over. Which means that Bernie Sanders would probably have beaten Trump had he won the primaries.
12:00.14TechnobliteratorI am partly smug
12:00.15WallriosAND PEPE IS THE PROPHET OF KEK
12:00.23Technobliteratorthat the last few decades of neoliberalism
12:00.28Technobliteratorare biting the establishment in the ass
12:01.26WallriosGaseous_Ink: >pro-worker
12:01.30Wallrios>nationalist
12:01.41Wallrios>opposed to the far-left groups
12:01.49WallriosWait a minute...
12:01.53HachimanIt's undoubted that Hillary was a plant imo
12:01.55Worm_hairThe establishment is dominantly neolib in my opinion
12:01.55TechnobliteratorSanders would've won since he won the demographic overwhelmingly that Clinton lost
12:02.03Technobliteratorwhich is the rust belt white working class vote
12:02.07Technobliteratorthat normally goes Democrat
12:02.10Gaseous_InkYes Impy, the Nazi parallels are known to us.
12:02.34HachimanHE'S GONNA BUILD A DEATH CAMP, AND HE'LL MAKE THE JEWS PAY FOR IT
12:03.38Gaseous_InkYeah, something like that
12:03.48Gaseous_InkEspecially how he's scapegoating the muslims
12:04.43HachimanTo be fair, Hillary had a hand in turning the Middle East into a political hotpot long before Trump came to Presidency and as a result killed far more people than Trump could ever hope to
12:05.21TechnobliteratorShe enabled the Bush administration doing that, yes
12:05.21Worm_hair"could ever hope to", we'll see
12:05.58Gaseous_InkYeah, we need to condemn Hillary's actions concerning the Middle East, but not underestimate Trump's ability to cause a genocide.
12:06.09Gaseous_InkThings like this always seem impossible until they happen.
12:06.14HachimanTrue
12:06.57TechnobliteratorI think he will start another illegal war for oil there
12:07.26Gaseous_InkISIS gives him a justification in the eyes of the West.
12:07.52TechnobliteratorI mean, I still doubt that ISIS even exists, personally
12:08.03Hachimanwat
12:08.07HachimanCare to elaborate?
12:08.33TechnobliteratorI believe it's just a group that takes credit for a bunch of random terrorists acting on their own
12:08.46Gaseous_InkOh, that makes sense
12:09.00Gaseous_InkAnd yes, I believe that. But the rebel group in the Middle East definitely exists.
12:09.07TechnobliteratorYup
12:09.15HachimanHm, I can believe that
12:09.56HachimanI believe ISIS is a physical entity but its sheer scale is non-existent
12:09.57Gaseous_InkSince terrorism is basicallly an advertisement, ISIS will take any publicity they can get.
12:10.15Gaseous_InkDid they once take credit for something that turned out to be an accident?
12:10.36HachimanThey did
12:15.18*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.146)
12:15.34Gaseous_InkISIS is losing territory very quickly, so I doubt they'll be a credible threat much longer. Unless Turkey's war on the Kurdish allows an ISIS resurgence in Syria.
12:15.36ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: About ISIS, that is how many terrorist groups work
12:15.53ImpyDroidAs a network, without a clear government structure, and as an idea
12:16.14Gaseous_InkThe right-wing will then start using Al-Nusra as their fear mongering tool.
12:17.12Technobliteratoryup
12:17.27ImpyDroidTechnobliterator: ISIS made themselves more than just a terrorist group, they devoted themselves to an ideal, and if we can't stop them, they will become something else entirely... a legend
12:17.55ImpyDroidOh wait nobody got that reference nvm
12:18.15ImpyDroidAnd yeah Russia already uses al-Nusra as a scapegoat
12:20.53ImpyDroidI wonder how Trump will handle Syria
12:22.03Gaseous_InkProbably by bombing it
12:23.00Gaseous_InkAmerican foreign policiy is not likely to change
12:23.35ImpyDroidI wonder if Putin will reach an agreement with Trump there
12:23.38Gaseous_InkExcept he'll be a lot more impotent since he's used to getting his own way and can only handle things with lawsuits and tantrums.
12:23.52ImpyDroidI find it unlikely, we need a conflict to keep the war hysteria
12:24.18Gaseous_InkOf course
12:24.23ImpyDroidBut we also need to resolve our issues inside the country
12:24.27ImpyDroidSo, 50/50
12:32.28Worm_hairtest
12:34.29Worm_hairHachiman, Technobliterator:  Tram overturned in London, loss of life reported http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37919658
12:34.36HachimanOuch
12:34.39Technobliteratordamn
13:16.29Hachiman"Don't be fooled people. All this stuff in America is just to bury the news about the new Toblerone."
13:16.42*** join/#sporewiki Tek0516 (uid149600@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qftxahrvbeffbehy)
13:20.25*** join/#sporewiki Monet (~Monet47@cpc90522-gill20-2-0-cust960.20-1.cable.virginm.net)
13:22.04Monethttp://www.gamesradar.com/mass-effect-andromeda-has-10-collectors-editions-including-a-270-remote-control-space-car-option/ I predicted EA would roll out preorders
13:34.01*** part/#sporewiki Monet (~Monet47@cpc90522-gill20-2-0-cust960.20-1.cable.virginm.net)
13:42.57*** join/#sporewiki dino82_ (52b0ddef@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.176.221.239)
13:43.12dino82_hi
13:49.03ImpyDroidHachiman" https://vk.com/doc376379833_438025097?hash=58c95cbf10f260cf5e&dl=1478699294c08db3a0eb65113be8&api=1
13:52.00Hachimanhur
14:02.50Tek0516So last night wasn't a sleep deprived nightmare then. :P
14:08.08*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@host-55-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
14:08.53*** join/#sporewiki NeonPanda (65b30e25@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.179.14.37)
14:08.59NeonPandaand I'm back
14:09.24Tek0516Hey NeonPanda
14:10.25NeonPandaTek0516: got particle lances finally
14:10.36NeonPandathough this playthrough has gotten meh
14:12.12Tek0516Maybe I'll get a chance to try them out soon. The clustered FE I keep mentioning will definitely make this game interesting very soon now that I've exceeded 20k fleet power.
14:12.31NeonPandaI'm in a federation with three of the other somewhat significant powers in the area, but there was one AI who basically got left alone to the point that I really want to fight them just to see what happens, but I'm pretty sure they can fight all three of us (mainly because I'm like 75% of our combined fleet power(
14:15.37Tek0516Huh. I haven't had an AI emerge anywhere in the galaxy capable of challenging me, other than the growing alliances and numerous federations.
14:16.39Tek0516Even after losing half my fleet only three empires were even "equivalent".
14:17.14NeonPandathey've only got like 12-16 planets, but they basically had a fifth of the galaxy to themselves which they've very liberally expanded into
14:18.00Tek0516Part of the advantage for me was that I ended up getting exactly that as well.
14:18.42NeonPandathey're literally the only ones who match up to me, thing is I'm pretty sure they're like borderline superior to me in fleet strength, and I haven't had anyone weak to pick on
14:18.59NeonPandaso the militarist side has gained me absolutely nothing
14:21.09Tek0516Yeah
14:25.42*** join/#sporewiki Xho (97e0b05c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.151.224.176.92)
14:27.10XhoViolent Sleep of Reason on repeat today
14:52.41*** join/#sporewiki Cyrannian|Away (uid97882@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-egsqqzpusvtwdliu)
14:52.51*** join/#sporewiki ZF101 (a85bff65@gateway/web/freenode/ip.168.91.255.101)
14:53.03ZF101Hello all.
14:53.08ZF101And God help us all.
14:53.11Tek0516https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/hoi4-dev-diary-autonomy.981050/ Ooh, neat. British Empire stuff in HoI4
14:53.23Tek0516Hello Cyrannian and ZF101
14:54.25CyrannianHi
14:54.33*** mode/#sporewiki [+o Cyrannian] by ChanServ
14:55.50ZF101Good lord, what has my country come to.
14:58.44Tek0516Canada's immigration website has been down since last night. :P
14:58.58ZF101I heard.
14:58.59TechnobliteratorI wonder how many people will legitimately do it :o
14:59.09ZF101None, their cowards.
14:59.14ZF101All to talk and no action.
15:00.04CyrannianNot that it matters, but Hillary is still leading the popular vote, if that's any consolation http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
15:00.20XhoWell
15:00.25XhoGet the vaults built and pronto
15:00.31Tek0516Well Canada is basically what would happen if most of your politicians' "progressive" ideas had been implemented for years or decades. >.>
15:00.35TechnobliteratorShe won the popular vote
15:00.49Technobliteratorthe electoral college vote went to Trump because it's a stupid system
15:00.59Technobliteratorif this doesn't inspire an electoral college change, I don't know what will, really
15:00.59ZF101I've always hated the Electoral college.
15:01.23ZF101Yeah, when Trump starts a war, I have several countries in mind.
15:01.47ZF101Mars seems good this time of year.
15:02.34TechnobliteratorI mean, he'll probably pick up some country in the Middle East and invade it illegally
15:02.35Technobliteratorlike Bush did
15:02.57HachimanIncoming Trumpistan
15:03.29XhoI for one welcome the Deathclaws
15:03.41ZF101The problem is, we have no clue what he's going to do next.
15:04.04ImpyDroid2Hachiman: Pussygrab the hinjab
15:04.06ImpyDroid2&hijab
15:04.09Hachimankek
15:04.09CyrannianTechnobliterator: http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2016/03/03/iraqi-army-invades-america-to-liberate-its-people-from-donald-trump/?utm_source=WWN_Facebook_Page&utm_medium=Facebook&utm_campaign=Social_Link&utm_content=Article
15:04.12HachimanHE'S GONNA BUILD A WALL
15:04.21HachimanIT'LL BE THE GREATEST WALL AND HE'LL MAKE THE MEXICANS PAY FOR IT
15:05.01XhoAnd this guy is a billionaire
15:05.14XhoYou'd think he'd have an actual business plan for this wall
15:05.34NeonPandahe's a billionaire by merit of how many times he's been bailed out, tbh
15:06.00XhoUnless the whole campaign was actually a business plan to get into power and he'll do something completely different
15:06.15XhoIn that case this guy is actually smart
15:06.58ImpyDroid2Cyrannian: Wow, look at the comments
15:07.11ImpyDroid2How come Trump followers have no sense of humour
15:08.05XhoA lack of sense of humour usually correlates with idiocy
15:09.04ImpyDroid2Xho Hachiman Technobliterator: https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=CfC8Va27Q8I Been listening to this song non stop today
15:09.04ZF101Impy, it's all a plot by the Liberal Jew media to be all politically correct and all that.
15:09.29Technobliteratorat this point, I'm not in the mood
15:09.37Hachiman>Sabaton
15:10.06CyrannianYeah, I think I'm going to avoid American politics for the foreseeable future
15:10.26ImpyDroid2Hachiman: You do not like them?
15:10.38HachimanI'm honestly not a fan
15:10.44HachimanUsed to be but they got all repetitive for me
15:10.55XhoNope
15:11.00XhoNot a fan of Sabaton eiter
15:11.02ImpyDroid2Yeah come to think about their style is kind of repetitive
15:11.21XhoImpyDroid2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Violent_Sleep_of_Reason
15:11.48XhoMeshuggah predicted this I swear
15:18.01ImpyDroid2After Brexit and Trump I wonder
15:18.03ImpyDroid2What is next
15:18.12ImpyDroid2Merkel overthrown?
15:18.20Tek0516FFS. I just got handed back a midterm they didn't even finish marking. >.>
15:18.21ImpyDroid2Japan remilitarises?
15:18.31HachimanProbably another beloved celebrity dying
15:18.38ImpyDroid2That is normal
15:19.56XhoHachiman: Time to start up a dead pool
15:20.37ImpyDroid2Xho: TRUMP GON GIV IT TO YA
15:25.45ImpyDroid2Hachiman: Imagine if California tries to secede now after Trump's election
15:25.57Hachimanhur
15:26.40NeonPandaI'm still waiting for the secession of America from Dumbfuckistan
15:26.40ImpyDroid2The Confederate Socialist States of America
15:26.58ImpyDroid2NeonPanda: How can you secede from itself?
15:27.01CyrannianMight as well work on my Apollo story, vote Apollo/Gorf in 2020 guise
15:27.04ImpyDroid2*one secede from
15:27.11NeonPandahttp://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq46/arroyocosplay/LOL.jpg for those who don't know what I'm talking about
15:27.39ImpyDroid2Basically what I am talking about
15:28.13ImpyDroid2"Gender-Neutral Deity of Any Denomination that Might or Might Not Exist, Save the West"
15:29.02CyrannianHachiman: https://www.facebook.com/xavier.bratcher.9/videos/1819752414949402/
15:31.15ImpyDroid2Cyrannian: What does the Irish government think about the potential absorption of Ulster?
15:31.42ImpyDroid2Post-Brexit that is
15:33.21Tek0516Ugh. I just reas an article defending the Electoral College and cringed a lot. It basically took everything undemocratic about the system and framed it as a good thing. >.<
15:33.48NeonPandaso what exactly is the electoral college?
15:34.09CyrannianImpyDroid2: I doubt that will happen any time soon, though the current Irish government isn't the strongest advocate of unification, though through indifference rather than opposition
15:34.22ImpyDroid2Hachiman: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/us/california-today-trump-president-kamala-harris-election.html?referer=https://www.google.ru/ Holy shit I thought I was joking
15:34.38Tek0516NeonPanda: Instead of electing a president you elect people to elect a president
15:34.55NeonPandathat... makes not much sense to me tbh
15:35.34Tek0516Also in basically every state it's winner takes all. So for example the 55 delegates of california are all given to the person with the most votes, regardlessof margin
15:35.57NeonPandaI see
15:36.27NeonPandaso like rather than all the electors being added up, all the electors of the state are added to whoever won in that state
15:36.46Tek0516NeonPanda: Basically it's a system made for 18th century society and technology that was also mean to appease smaller states. >.>
15:36.58NeonPandanot surprised
15:37.36NeonPandalike no offence to america but a lot of what I hear from them seems to still be rooted in the 18th century
15:37.59ZF101Yep, we're backwards as fuck.
15:38.06Tek0516NeonPanda: Oh, and the electors aren't necessarily to vote for the candidate they were chosen to vote for.
15:38.41NeonPandaso wait... you mean people can vote for someone to vote for a certain candidate, and then they can choose not to vote for that candidate?
15:38.45Tek0516Except in the few states where it's mandated they can vote for anyone they want to.
15:39.20Tek0516It's never swayed an election but you can see the problem.
15:39.34NeonPandahow is America still functional as a country at this rate?
15:40.16ImpyDroid2It isn't
15:40.24ImpyDroid2As these elections have proven
15:40.38Tek0516NeonPanda: Also because of the statewide winner takes all, most states are "safe" and as a result the entire election is determined by the half-dozen "swing states". And this is intentionally supported by the parties so they can do less campaigning.
15:41.09NeonPandafor all its flaws, I like the Australian system a lot more now
15:41.24NeonPandacos we have three different people all telling the government to fuck off at various levels
15:42.03Tek0516I'm assuming Australia probably uses a Westminster system similar to Canada's?
15:42.32NeonPandawe're based on the british system, yeah
15:42.44TechnobliteratorWith proportional representation and ranked choice voting
15:42.47Technobliteratorso infinitely  better
15:42.52NeonPandalocal, state and federal government, with elected representatives at each level
15:43.06CyrannianA parliamentary republic with proportional representation ftw
15:43.16ImpyDroid2Silly Westerns
15:43.19ImpyDroid2*Westerners
15:43.25ImpyDroid2With your silly democracy
15:43.28ZF101Dat sounds like socialist propaganda.
15:43.39*** join/#sporewiki Monet (~Monet47@cpc90522-gill20-2-0-cust960.20-1.cable.virginm.net)
15:44.15ImpyDroid2Monet: The Dark Lord rises
15:44.32MonetI'd rather not talk about it.
15:44.44ImpyDroid2Come on it is fun
15:45.08ZF101Not for the American here.
15:45.20Tek0516I'm fine with the Canadian system but I'd prefer something proportional. Of course now Trudeau is backing out of that promise. >.<
15:45.35NeonPandafor clarity's sake, what do you mean by proportional?
15:46.15Tek0516Not sure, I think they were doing a whole thing to look into what would be the "best" alternative.
15:46.48Tek0516Just something other than First Past The Post basically.
15:47.45TechnobliteratorTrudeau is breaking that promise?
15:47.46TechnobliteratorUgh
15:48.03ImpyDroid2Why?
15:48.06ImpyDroid2Because it is 2016
15:48.09Tek0516Apparently. That's what I've been hearing.
15:48.28TechnobliteratorI hope he doesn't win reelection if that's the case
15:48.32Tek0516That was one promise I wanted a lot. >.>
15:48.36Technobliteratorthat's ridiculous
15:48.49TechnobliteratorIf he breaks his promise on legal marijuana, then wow
15:49.02Tek0516Well that's definitely going forward AFAIK
15:49.39TechnobliteratorI would hope so
15:49.41MonetImpyDroid2: The past two public votes - this and the EU referendum - have said to me that more and more people would rather tear something down to make change than encourage internal reform.
15:50.06ImpyDroid2Monet: People with more radical opinions win because moderates will not vote
15:50.27ImpyDroid2What they lack in quantity they make up in quality so to speak
15:50.37NeonPandawhich is why voting is mandatory in Australia :P
15:51.01Tek0516Technobliterator: Well the Conservatives don't want it at all AFAIK.
15:51.15TechnobliteratorThis does not surprise me
15:51.46MonetTwo national votes in a row fuelled by anger. I declared the election a complete circus a year ago. This only confirms my point.
15:52.20MonetPeople aren't interested in the facts any more, only the sensational rhetoric they agree with.
15:53.05ImpyDroid2NeonPanda: The rest of the world should follow you
15:53.30NeonPandaindeed they should, we will teach them the ways of ordering a bunnings sausage via drone
15:53.31ZF101"Education is the greatest safe guard for democracy."
15:53.38Tek0516There is a committee for electoral reform that's supposed to issue its findings by December 1st so we'll see how that goes.
15:56.22Tek0516Technobliterator: Doesn't help that I think most of the systems work in favour of the liberals more than any of the other two major parties.
15:56.28Cyrannianhttp://www.politico.com/livestream1 - Hillary's concession speech live :<
15:56.59ImpyDroid2Cyrannian: "Drat! *hiss*"
15:57.06Monet<PROTECTED>
15:57.35ZF101Yeah, best we can do is hunker down and wait out these four, long, looong years.
15:57.44ImpyDroid2Monet: TBH for me all this seems like part of a greater trend
15:58.10NeonPandacorrect me if I'm wrong, but isn't one of the things that the president can't have a criminal history?
15:58.34NeonPandacos there are a couple of charges being brought against Trump, so there is that one fringe hope
15:58.39MonetNeonPanda: He's never been convicted afaik.
15:58.57CyrannianHoping she dons a black cloak and announces that Trump's rebellion has been foiled and that in order to ensure our security and continuing stability...
15:59.01NeonPandahe hasn't been convicted but there's a couple of charges going to trial
15:59.17NeonPandaCyrannian: I would dig that tbh
16:00.01CyrannianBlack pantsuit rather
16:00.03ImpyDroid2Cyrannian: Aren't they both Sith tho
16:00.15ImpyDroid2Who is the Master and who is the Apprentice, I wonder
16:00.37MonetHe spends millions a year from his own foundation on litigation. Either charging or defending. But for all I know that could be just another ingredient in this great blurred stew of fiction and reality.
16:00.38CyrannianTrump is a Hutt, if anything
16:00.48*** join/#sporewiki Charles_Bot (uid94017@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-orcmrpatcoenxpxb)
16:01.05ImpyDroid2Sexual harassment, wealth, orange-ish colour
16:01.10ImpyDroid2Yeah kind of works
16:01.29Charles_BotOh my we're still talking about this
16:01.38Monet<PROTECTED>
16:01.41TechnobliteratorWell
16:01.42ImpyDroid2What would you expect
16:01.44Technobliteratorit's pretty big news
16:02.24ZF101We Americans have gone from JFK and Eisenhower to this. What the hell happened to this nation.
16:02.29Tek0516Charles_Bot: Well we had a tangent for a while where we discussed electoral systens in general
16:02.38Technobliteratorand FDR
16:02.52ZF101And Teddy.
16:03.05TechnobliteratorI know less about Teddy
16:03.43Charles_BotHe was badass
16:04.08Tek0516I'll just sit (mostly) calmly in Canada and hope for the best. >.>
16:04.26ZF101He could identify birds by their calls, read a novel a day, and, when boxing grew too much for him, went into Judo for a softer sport.
16:04.37TechnobliteratorI just hope he wasn't serious about the Paris agreement. I can rest easy then.
16:05.44Tek0516He hasn't exactly supported fighting climate change so far. I saw something from him about "clean coal" or something. >.>
16:06.11Technobliteratorand has surrounded himself by people who also don't believe it's real
16:06.35TechnobliteratorWell, what do you expect when none of the news outlets bring it up and when it wasn't even a question during the debates
16:06.40Technobliteratorthanks oil money
16:11.26MonetImpyDroid: Trying to look for positives. Last night I killed Deathwing solo.
16:11.30XhoThey had Reagan mind you
16:11.41XhoNot exactly a pivotal turn in qualified politics
16:12.51*** join/#sporewiki Hachiman (5aff20db@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.255.32.219)
16:12.59HachimanShitty internet
16:13.00ImpyDroid2Welcome back
16:13.10Xhogoddamn rag         break down my shitty intanet
16:14.09Tek0516I'm not quite the same level of doomsayer quite yet. In government he'll hopefully become a little more moderate. He'll probably start breaking promises by the dozen. I'm just going to hope it's not as bad as we're fearing.
16:14.13MonetStupid punk-ass god dragon, felt good to seriously injure him and tear of his armour after landing on his back via a high fantasy HALO jump.
16:14.29TechnobliteratorObama is meeting him on Thursday
16:14.52TechnobliteratorI hope he says "look, repeal Obamacare all you want, even rip up the Iran deal, but do NOT rip up the Paris agreement"
16:17.08XhoObama's still president mind you
16:17.12XhoLet's just enjoy these last few months
16:18.25Tek0516Monet: After that Stellaris Ether Drake taunting me I finally slaughtered it in an intense battle on Monday. Always fun for a satisfying boss battle victory.
16:23.14CyrannianSpeech is beginning
16:24.22Technobliteratorthey're all clapping for some reason
16:24.37MonetBecause it's polite?
16:24.39ImpyDroid2Come on it is going to be fun
16:25.00Technobliteratorno, I mean
16:25.05Technobliteratorthey're clapping when nothing happened
16:25.16Technobliteratorno one is even on stage yet
16:25.43XhoOkay well
16:25.47XhoThat's the personal statement done
16:25.49XhoReferences
16:25.50Xhooh joy
16:26.54Technobliteratoris she coming on stage or what
16:27.28ZF101Well, I've gotta go. I'm gonna miss stable, sane leadership.
16:29.23Cyrannianpls hurry hillary, I need to head to work soon
16:30.09Monetit'll be recorded for later
16:32.50ImpyDroid2Xho Hachiman: Fuck
16:33.28Tek0516I guess next is Trump's victory speech?
16:33.52Xho?
16:34.38Technobliteratorhis speech was ages ago
16:34.39Technobliteratorit was pretty good
16:34.44Technobliteratorbut he obviously didn't write/mean it
16:34.59Technobliteratorlol
16:35.04TechnobliteratorKaine's delivering the concession speech
16:35.54Tek0516Oh. I remember last night something about the concession speech usually happens first
16:36.02Technobliteratornormally
16:36.05Technobliteratorit didn't in 2012
16:36.14TechnobliteratorRomney was so confident he didn't write one
16:36.22Tek0516O.o
16:45.46Tek0516I'm almost wondering if Clinton hadn't prepared one either
16:45.52TechnobliteratorI cannot believe Trump's speech is more respectful than hers
16:46.08TechnobliteratorThis is incredible
16:46.25Technobliteratorshe's basically saying "yeah, I guess I respect it, but why the fuck did you guys vote Trump"
16:49.08Xhotroll
16:51.30Technobliteratoralso a bit of "dude, you better not be a racist as president"
16:56.18CyrannianI teared up a bit there
16:56.46TechnobliteratorIt was really good at the end
16:57.58CyrannianThat woman should have been president.
17:07.47TechnobliteratorAlas
17:08.53*** join/#sporewiki dino82_ (52b0ddef@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.176.221.239)
17:08.57dino82_hi
17:15.41Charles_BotMy facebook (embedded in a weird mixture of the California and New England social media bubbles) is so toxic right now
17:18.16Charles_BotThe stock market is okay
17:18.22Charles_BotWe're back in the green
17:18.51TechnobliteratorI hear some people in California want to secede
17:19.04TechnobliteratorI find that ridiculous, since that's what Texas wanted to do in 2012
17:19.09Charles_Bot^
17:19.29Charles_BotIt's not actually being seriously considered
17:21.45*** join/#sporewiki DrodoEmpire (8ea7203a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.142.167.32.58)
17:23.17Technobliteratorwhich is good
17:28.45Monethttp://spore.wikia.com/wiki/Fiction:Second_Borealis_Galactic_War/Part_1#Greater_Scope_Than_Before
17:30.34MonetOluap and I did a thing
17:35.26Charles_BotWell
17:39.16*** join/#sporewiki Imperios (~Imperios@95.140.92.4)
17:40.07MonetCharles_Bot: Hm?
17:46.57dino82_Was a surprise
17:47.10dino82_the us electoins, now lets hope for the best
17:53.13*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
17:53.34WormydroidUgh database engineering sucks
17:58.24Tek0516Wormydroid: what are you doing?
18:00.32WormydroidUsing PHP my admin: creating a database ysing SQL code and then trying to import data
18:00.51Tek0516Ah
18:00.52WormydroidOnly I'm getting duplicate key errors
18:01.41WormydroidI've tried adding data after creating primary and foreign keys, and I've tried creating the keys the first.  I've checked the integriry
18:02.01WormydroidConsistency
18:02.10*** join/#sporewiki ZF101 (4933de11@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.51.222.17)
18:15.21Tek0516So yesterday the caption on a webcomic I read was "STOP READING COMICS AND GO VOTE". Today it's "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH". XD
18:17.17WormydroidOn telly today there was an old spaghetti western with the name "Trumpet" in it, can't be s coincidence
18:17.21WormydroidA
18:19.29ImperiosCharles_Bot DrodoEmpire: https://www.reddit.com/r/heraldry/comments/5c2prm/coat_of_arms_of_donald_trump/ Made a little doodle for the occasion
18:20.04DrodoEmpireayy lmao
18:20.39WormydroidHe's half Scottish so he might have one
18:24.34WormydroidWhich might be good news for us post-Brexit
18:34.07Imperiosdino82_: I've been  wondering
18:34.20dino82_yeah?
18:34.33ImperiosIs there any particular history between the colours of your country's flags?
18:34.47ImperiosI know that we took our colours from your flag
18:34.56Imperios*your country's flag
18:35.19ImperiosAlso, how come it isn't orange if you are ruled by the House of Oranje?
18:36.17dino82_It isn't orange because in the past, when the Dutch were still a Republic not all were orangist
18:36.20dino82_not all supported the monarchy
18:37.10ImperiosAh, so the red stands for republican ideals
18:38.33dino82_The flag has been used since around 1572 aand has nfluenced both the Russian and French flags. and represents in colors the livery of William of Orange, the first Stadholder of the NL. It was formerlly orange but eventually turned red due to not all supporting the monarch
18:38.51dino82_the once tha tdid use the orange instead of the red is known as the Flag of the Prince
18:39.34dino82_currently we use the red-white-blue and an orange pennant is added for Kings Day and Princeday
18:40.02dino82_The flag goes half way at the 5th of may, when we have death remembrance day
18:40.07dino82_srry the 4th
18:40.14Imperiosrite
18:40.30dino82_on the 5th we celebrate our liberation from German control
18:40.36dino82_and mostly the flags are waved
18:41.12dino82_they flags have been usedby our differant states, (dutch Replic, Seven Provinces and currenlty the Kingdom of the Netherlands)
18:42.10dino82_I think it continued to even be waved during the French occupation of Napoleon, butnot sure on that
18:43.13ImperiosI thought Napoleon left puppet states in the areas he conquered
18:44.04Imperioshttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/Flag_of_the_Batavian_Republic.svg Oh yes apparently he made one in the Netherlands
18:44.08ImperiosThe flag looks sweet
18:44.37dino82_lol
18:44.51dino82_though I didn't knew it inspired the Russian flag as well, that is new to me
18:47.08ImperiosRussian tsars used to employ Dutch shipwrights to make seagoing vessels I believe
18:47.19dino82_oh ok! Neat in the times of the tsars?
18:47.56ImperiosVery late in the Tsardom era, right before its transition into the Russian Empire
18:48.03dino82_Yeah, the Dutch were once everywhere in the glorious day of the East Indian Trade Company, sadly we did some bad things as well that still haunt us sometimes (current discussion regarding the 5th of december etc)
18:48.20ImperiosI think it was first used by Peter's father
18:48.25ImperiosAlexei III I think
18:48.34ImperiosThen Peter popularised that flag further
18:48.43dino82_I have never been to Russia before, it is still on my wishlist to visit St Peterburg and teh Red Square!
18:48.55dino82_Oh neat! New history knowledge:D
18:48.59ImperiosThe Red Square is in Moscow, we have the Palace Square XD
18:49.11ImperiosPalace Square and the Rebellion Square
18:49.34dino82_Two places I wold love to visit, moscow and St. Peterburg
18:49.38ImperiosAh
18:49.41dino82_though so many countrie sI still wanna visit :D
18:49.50dino82_did visit some but ah well, world is pretty big
18:50.06dino82_love travelling, you too?
19:08.32dino82_test
19:49.24ImperiosXho: I like how all Russians are like "YAY TRUMP YAY"
20:16.12*** join/#sporewiki Tybusen (8036b784@gateway/web/freenode/ip.128.54.183.132)
20:16.24TybusenGood morning everyone, welcome to the darkest timeline
20:18.04ImperiosTybusen: The rise of evil, ladies and gentlemen
20:18.20Imperios...Though it would be that either way
20:18.38ImperiosTybusen: California and the West Coast ought to secede
20:18.43ImperiosConfederate Socialist States of America when
20:19.16TybusenI mean
20:19.24TybusenWest Coast has totally legalized weed now
20:19.42TybusenProp 64 passed so weed's now legal in CA
20:19.56TybusenMaybe we should just be the Confederate Socialist States of Weed
20:20.15ImperiosTybusen: Independence Day becomes April the 20th
20:20.19TybusenAnd this will be the new capital: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weed,_California
20:22.17ImperiosHachiman: https://pp.vk.me/c626421/v626421954/378f5/HYJbGA9S2qw.jpg Seen this pic>
20:22.18Imperios?
20:22.40TybusenOh well, new Pokemon game comes out next week so that'll distract from the flustercluck
20:23.06ImperiosTybusen: Look at this the other way, it'll be fun to watch the president now
20:23.19Tybusenehh
20:33.52Tek0516Sitting down in the campus library I swear half the conversations I overhear are about the election in some way pr another.
20:35.27TybusenWell I mean that's understandable
20:35.42TybusenIt's kind of a major event and it's literally the day after
20:35.54TybusenSome people went to sleep yesterday and woke up to a Trump presidency
20:43.45Monetraises his hand
20:45.47Imperiosdoes as well
20:45.53ImperiosIt was a good beginning of the day
20:46.27HachimanAye
20:46.34HachimanAlways nice to wake up to the lesser of two evils
20:47.00TybusenThe president of the most powerful country in the world is a literal meme
20:47.20HachimanWe Metal Gear now
20:48.27Monetno comment
20:49.34MonetI'm more inclined to speak privately on anything.
20:52.34MonetSorry, took a nap possibly an hour ago, woke up thinking I had a nightmare but can't recall what it was.
20:52.39ImperiosHachiman: I remember actually laughing in my bed as I first opened my phone and saw the results
20:52.46Imperios"What the- AHAHAHAHA"
20:52.58ImperiosMonet: It was actually a vision of the future
20:53.35TechnobliteratorI mean, on climate change we're done for
20:53.41Technobliteratorbut I can't say I'm too upset
20:54.21ImperiosEither way China would continue causing climate change
20:55.36MonetImperios: Stuff from the moments before dreaming is coming back.
20:55.49Technobliteratoroh, that makes me feel so much better
20:55.50Technobliteratoroh well
20:56.01Technobliteratorgive us a few decades and I think the planet's dead
20:57.21TybusenI'm pretty sure either way we would've been done for on climate change
20:58.07MonetRight now the smarter option for climate change is adapt and mitigate. No amount of wishing "if only we had done better" will change anything.
20:59.02ImperiosTybusen: https://2ch.hk/po/src/19167149/14786951327200.jpg Have I shown you that pic already?
20:59.11MonetHumans are hard-wired to be adaptable and you know what? Whether it's global warming, Trump or ISIS, the real survivors are those wh oadapt ot change
20:59.44Technobliteratorwe're clearly not adapting
20:59.47Technobliteratorbecause of oil money
20:59.57MonetThen adapt on an individual basis.
21:00.20Technobliteratorbecause we can get enough people to do that, clearly
21:00.54MonetWhat I realised a few minutes ag ois this: Who cares. Millions of other people voted for an idiot for president.
21:01.15TechnobliteratorAnd billions will die because of it
21:01.21Technobliteratorthanks oil money
21:01.23Technobliteratorthanks Democrats
21:01.50MonetAre we going to whine about the bad choice or could we - not the millions of Americans but each of us here in the community - unleash our human potential and adapt to this change?
21:03.07HachimanI mean, hey
21:03.16HachimanWe could be whining about the worst choice amiright
21:03.28MonetStart at the core. Achieve full control over your own body first, before you start worrying about the level of control you have over the larger spheres.
21:03.29HachimanAnd have allowed Shillary into power
21:04.25ImperiosTHere's an old Russian prisoner riddle about this
21:05.00Imperios"One chair has spikes on it, the other has dicks. Where will you sit yourself and where will you put your mother?"
21:05.11ImperiosAnswer? "Take the spikes and cut the dicks"
21:05.25Hachimankek
21:05.41HachimanAlso, I'm fairly convinced that we were fucked in regards to climate change even if we had Sanders as President
21:06.29HachimanThe climate is inevitably in the process of changing, both naturally and artificially, and it's too far gone for anyone to stop at this point
21:06.53TechnobliteratorDo you really think that it couldn't have been slowed down just enough for us to have a grip on it?
21:07.09TechnobliteratorWe could have 100% renewable energy right now
21:07.10Technobliteratorwe do not
21:07.13Technobliteratorbecause oil money
21:07.20TechnobliteratorWe also could have world peace right now
21:07.21Technobliteratorwe do not
21:07.23Technobliteratorbecause oil money
21:07.45MonetIt could have, but complaining it took us this long to start changing fixes nothing
21:08.07HachimanAs Monet said, it could have, but not anymore
21:08.31TechnobliteratorWell, I guess the only positive is that Trump's foreign policy half the time was non-interventionism
21:08.40HachimanWhich is surprising
21:08.44TechnobliteratorI believe that's all bullshit now and he'll surround himself with interventionists and war hawks, but
21:08.57Technobliteratorthere's a smidgen of hope that we get a better foreign policy on the Middle East
21:08.59DrodoEmpirehttp://i.imgur.com/dIOneZf.jpg
21:09.01MonetHumanity's greatest obstacle to adaptation is wishing things could be like yesteryear.
21:09.49Technobliteratoralright, best case scenario
21:09.59TechnobliteratorTrump does not rip up the Paris agreement, instead he just doesn't enforce it
21:10.02Technobliteratorit's still extremely bad
21:10.10Technobliteratorbut it just means the states do the work on their own
21:10.10HachimanTrump builds a wall
21:10.17Technobliteratorand other countries stick to it
21:10.34Technobliteratorthat is the best hope we have
21:10.41Technobliteratorotherwise, give us a few decades
21:10.42Technobliteratorand dead
21:10.53MonetSometimes you just have to ignore what your neighbour is doing and tackle a solution.
21:12.23HachimanWell, at least we still have Svalbard
21:12.31MonetI for instance could talk to my neighbours about using my herb garden as an ash tray. I could talk to them about how they have no control over their dogs' barking, but I have almost zero guarantee they'll sort things out their end.
21:13.44HachimanAlso I honestly doubt Clinton would have done jack shit about environmental conservationism
21:14.13MonetThe only thing that could be done is making sure the climate-deniers aren't congressmen.
21:14.17HachimanIt's not in her interests and it's something she'd say to gain popularity because of course it would, just like hanging around ethnic and social minorities
21:15.15MonetThe United Kingdom didn't survive a world war by telling Germany to stop it with the Atlantic raiding. It survived by encouraging its people to turn every green space into a vegetable garden.
21:15.18TechnobliteratorShe wouldn't have ripped up the Paris agreement, Hachi
21:15.24TechnobliteratorThat's already infinitely better
21:15.38Technobliteratoreven if her platform promises on building more solar panels were bullshit
21:16.32HachimanEh true
21:17.57HachimanHopefully Kanye West isn't a climate change denier when he runs for Presidency in 2020
21:19.48Technobliteratoryou think he'll actually do it?
21:19.59HachimanI honestly wouldn't put it past him
21:20.06TechnobliteratorFair enough
21:20.22TechnobliteratorThe best scenario, really, is Trump not scrapping the Paris agreement, and just failing to enforce it
21:20.55*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.4)
21:21.03HachimanAlthough ideally, I'd want Michelle Obama for President in 2020; although considering she's black, a woman, and related to Obama who is considered by many to be an ineffectual President, I doubt she would get very far
21:21.16HachimanOh and the fact she has to contend with the Meme Man himself
21:23.22MonetTrump won the sprint, now he must endure the marathon.
21:24.42HachimanAt this point, I'm wondering if Trump will continue his anti-establishment streak or if he will fall in line with Congress
21:24.44MonetIf people think he looks unhealthy now, wait to they see what four years of presidential stress will do.
21:26.10Monethttp://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1617425.1392669679!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_1200/george-w-bush-2001-2005-2009.jpg see how Dubya change since he entered the office.
21:26.13TybusenGiven Trump's social status I doubt he'll deliver on most of his promises for the working-class
21:26.28Technobliteratorhe'll probably scrap trade deals
21:26.34Technobliteratorit won't help, but he'll try and scrap them
21:26.44Monetthisis him in 01 (starting), 05 (reelection) and 09 (leaving)
21:26.50Technobliteratoror maybe he will try, and his own congress will oppose
21:26.53Technobliteratorthen twitter
21:26.54TybusenI'd be fine with TPP getting flushed down the drain
21:26.59DrodoEmpireMonet: W's deterioration's nothing compared to Obama's >.<
21:27.39Technobliterator@POTUS Congress keep trying to block trade deal bills. System is totally rigged! #DrainTheSwampAgain
21:27.51MonetDrodoEmpire: The job has only gotten more stressful post-9/11
21:27.58DrodoEmpireTrue
21:28.00Technobliteratoralong with "Sad!" and "total losers!"
21:28.12Technobliteratoryeah, TPP failing is the silver lining
21:28.25Technobliteratorand at least the war on drugs is mostly done with, I guess
21:28.48TybusenCA legalized marijuana so that's pretty much the death knell for marijuana being illegal
21:28.59Technobliteratoryup
21:29.09Technobliteratorwar on drugs is over
21:29.11TechnobliteratorI will not miss it
21:29.11DrodoEmpireYeah its beginning to wind down, hopefully
21:29.14MonetDrodoEmpire: But I see your point. It's surprising how he was hailed as the youngest president in decades when he was elected.
21:29.23DrodoEmpireDefinitely. That whole war was a disease on society
21:29.54HachimanWar on Drugs was more ineffectual than Obama
21:30.07TybusenNext step in reversing the damage of the War on Drugs is to invest more in rehabilitating people who get jailed for drug offenses
21:30.45MonetI have a feeling Obama's presidency will become more celebrated as time goes by.
21:31.18TybusenEh, I wouldn't put Obama's presidency in the bottom half of presidencies but I don't know if I'd put it at the top yet
21:31.29Technobliteratorwell, the Iran deal, the Cuba deal, the stimulus, and the work on climate change was pretty decent
21:31.35TybusenProbably too early to tell the consequences of all his policies
21:31.40TybusenIran and Cuba are good though
21:31.40TechnobliteratorObamacare is no longer part of his legacy, that's basically done for now
21:31.49MonetTybusen: Give it a decade or more.
21:32.11TechnobliteratorBut for the most part, he just didn't do enough to stand up to the neocons Bush put in there
21:32.18Technobliteratoror to his own corporatist party
21:32.23TybusenA decade for the foreign policy, four years for the economic policy
21:32.31TybusenYeah, that's my biggest grievance with Obama
21:32.39Technobliteratorhe wasted his first term trying to compromise with racists who would never compromise at all
21:32.40TybusenDidn't do enough to stand up to corporatism or corruption
21:32.47TechnobliteratorHe could've been the modern day FDR
21:33.05Technobliteratorinstead he was just a slightly better Bill Clinton
21:33.11DrodoEmpireYeah there's no doubt Obama was a capable leader, but a lot of his policies were either disrupted by his opposition or, less often, misguided on his part
21:33.17Technobliteratorhad he gone against Bush tax cuts, might've balanced the budget like Bill Clinton did
21:33.18Technobliteratormhm
21:33.40TechnobliteratorI honestly think if he was as good at playing politics as FDR was, things would be a whole lot better
21:33.46Technobliteratorbut he tried too much to be a uniter when it didn't work
21:33.56MonetPolitics was different in FDR's days.
21:34.03TechnobliteratorFDR was such a boss
21:34.16TechnobliteratorSupreme Court blocks you? Pfft, add in more Supreme Court Justices
21:34.22DrodoEmpireFDR is my favourite anime character
21:34.26TechnobliteratorYour own party blocks you? Blackmail them with primaries
21:34.44TybusenThough I suppose one thing to remember is that back in FDR's days, the modern Republican base was part of the Democratic base
21:34.53TechnobliteratorThe opposition compares you to Marx? Laugh it off and expose them for what they are
21:35.12MonetAnd corporations were a lot less intertwined in government.
21:35.14TechnobliteratorFDR was probably the best president the country ever had, and he won a war to boot
21:35.20Technobliteratormaybe Lincoln was better, I dunno
21:35.36Technobliteratorone destroyed slavery, the other destroyed the banks
21:35.40Tybusen1940s Republicans were still allies of Big Business but they didn't have the racism and bigotry of the white southern base
21:35.46MonetWhat's Lincoln's legacy beyond the Emancipation Act?
21:35.59Technobliteratorhe won a Civil War to get said Emancipation Act
21:36.09Technobliteratorand was also extremely good at playing politics to get there
21:36.13TybusenLincoln was entirely a wartime president so most of his legacy is tied to the Civil War
21:36.20HachimanIt is people like Lincoln and Roosevelt that modern Presidents should care to live up to
21:36.51TechnobliteratorYup
21:36.52*** join/#sporewiki Cyrannian (uid97882@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kkwrudwexammacqr)
21:36.52*** mode/#sporewiki [+o Cyrannian] by ChanServ
21:37.00MonetWe saw what happened when Obama tried to stand up to a Republican congress - they were willing shut down the government itself.
21:37.20Technobliteratorsee, FDR wouldn't have allowed that
21:37.25Technobliteratorhe wouldn;t have let it get that far
21:38.09CyrannianHi everyone
21:38.12Technobliteratorhihi
21:38.18*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
21:38.24TybusenA really skilled politician would've been able to do some political judo on those shutdowns and use it to galvanize their base against the Republicans
21:38.31TybusenHi Cyr
21:38.47WormydroidHi
21:38.51MonetHi
21:38.54CyrannianHi
21:39.25Technobliteratorhihi
21:39.45Technobliteratoryeah, Obama was extremely good at the campaigning part, just not the political judo part
21:39.53DrodoEmpirehttp://imgur.com/gallery/Jy7OS3d
21:39.56Technobliteratorhence why he was only a decent president instead of the modern FDR
21:40.26*** join/#sporewiki The_Randomness (~chatzilla@2601:441:1:5b80:38fa:3be:64ac:69)
21:40.30MonetI think one of Obama's legacies could be he restored the kind of faith other nations had that Bush Jr. practically destroyed.
21:40.36The_RandomnessHello
21:40.36*** mode/#sporewiki [+o The_Randomness] by ChanServ
21:41.11CyrannianHi
21:42.11TybusenI think Obama's foreign policy legacy will be interesting
21:42.33TechnobliteratorIran and Cuba deal were fantastic
21:42.35TybusenOn one hand, he did some great stuff by dethawing relations with Cuba and Iran
21:42.36TechnobliteratorThe rest, disappointing
21:43.08TybusenOn the other hand, he's continued the military action in Afghanistan, and his actions in Libya and Syria have caused devastating instability
21:44.31MonetIt's possible what might magnify Obama's legacy is it followed one of the worst presidents in living memory.
21:46.47TybusenYeah but that sort of comparison effect will probably wear off as we get further and further away from 2016
21:47.10TybusenEspecially if the president after Trump ends up being the neo-FDR or neo-Lincoln
21:48.23TybusenWith the current state of the world as Obama is leaving office, history can still either vindicate or condemn him
21:49.01TybusenOr it could also just say "meh", we can't know
21:55.28Technobliteratorwell, my friend assures us not to worry
21:56.01Technobliteratorbecause apparently Trump is only controlled by a Rothschild-funded secret elite
21:56.05Technobliteratoryeah, she was not very bright
21:56.23TybusenWell I mean
21:56.27TybusenSouth Korea's leader
21:57.33Technobliteratorlike, this is someone I used to have genuine intelligent discussions with
21:57.40Technobliteratorand now she's posting Rothschild conspiracy theories
21:57.43Technobliteratorrolls eyes
21:58.53TybusenI've looked at my facebook feed a couple of times today and a lot of people are talking about "oh looks like america wasn't ready for a FEMALE PRESIDENT"
21:59.03TybusenAnd mostly, I'm just like,
21:59.20Tybusen"i don't that was the problem"
21:59.40TechnobliteratorTechnically speaking, they're wrong
21:59.48Technobliteratorthe majority of voters voted for the first female president
21:59.52Technobliteratorbut the electoral college did not
22:00.04TybusenThis election cycle has mostly disillusioned me on identity politics
22:00.27TechnobliteratorI think it has for a lot of people
22:00.45TybusenThere was so, so much identity politics being used by the Hillary campaign to shame people into voting for her
22:00.54*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
22:01.57Technobliteratorit was a winning strategy in 08 and in 2012
22:02.03MonetIt has baffled me for years how it's all about the figurehead, when the USA is a federal republic.
22:02.09Technobliteratorpurely from a demographic perspective
22:02.31Technobliteratorthey just lost the white working class vote in the rust belt states
22:02.32TybusenProblem is, Hillary didn't galvanize people like Obama did in 08
22:02.38TybusenYeah, that's the thing
22:02.42TybusenThe Rust Belt decided this election
22:03.44TybusenIf you look at the election map, every Rust Belt state went to Trump
22:03.56TybusenEven Michigan which typically leans more blue
22:03.59MonetA lot of the attacks I saw on Hilary weren't about her policies (how much coverage did her plan for Appalachia get other than 'Hilary wants to kill coal miners;?)
22:04.35TybusenThe entire campaign season was primarily identity politics rather than issue politics
22:04.57Technobliteratorwhich is not helped by most of the media outlets not covering policy at all
22:05.04Technobliteratorand all the debate questions basically being bullshit
22:05.16Technobliteratorno question on climate change
22:05.19TybusenHillary was banking on identity politics to net her the win because her policies were definitely not going to excite middle American voters
22:05.22Technobliteratorall we have to go on from Trump's position is:
22:05.28Technobliterator*leans into mic*
22:05.29TechnobliteratorWRONG
22:05.49TybusenHillary's campaign: "i'm a woman"
22:05.57TybusenTrump's campaign: "WRONG"
22:07.09MonetAnd from what I hear there aren't that many new faces in Congress.
22:07.39MonetSomething about how a lot of congressmen (or was it governors) got re-elected regardless of their performance.
22:08.20TybusenAs far as Representatives go, that probably has to do with districts being gerrymandered to shit and no one from same party challenging the incumbent
22:09.21TybusenMy home district had a Berniecrat running against the incumbent Republican
22:09.25MonetAlthough that seems to be the way of UK/American politics.
22:10.07TybusenPredictably, since my home district is wealthy and social conservative, the incumbent Republican gets voted in
22:10.27MonetI happen to live in a constituency where my MP is conservative, pro NHS, pro EU and pro-renewables and yet in the referendum the area voted to leave.
22:10.38TybusenThough, Orange County voted blue in the presidential election, which is surprising since OC is usually a red county in the presidential
22:10.51MonetMy constituency is a lucky one though.
22:10.54TechnobliteratorWell, that's why Trump promised to DRAIN THE SWAMP with term limits
22:11.01Technobliteratornot like that's very likely, but eh
22:12.02*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
22:12.09TybusenTerm limits could be a way to limit politicians from getting too comfy in Washington and becoming corrupt career politicians, but on the other hand that might get in the way of politicians who are actually public servants (like a certain Mr. Sanders)
22:12.12WormydroidHi
22:12.25TybusenHello
22:12.36MonetI grew up in a constituency where my MP was a lib-dem. I like the Lib-dems for their reputation of not being crazy but my hometown MP has been blamed for why the town was 80%-90% housing estate.
22:12.45Technobliteratoryeah, that's the thing
22:12.52WormydroidI wonder how beimg President will mesh with beibg a businessman
22:13.32TechnobliteratorI think my constituency is solid Labour
22:13.40TechnobliteratorI have no love for Labour, but I have no love for any party at all
22:13.54HachimanWRONG
22:14.24HachimanAlso I forgot the Lib-Dems existed
22:14.36TybusenPolitical analysts have been saying that Orange County might become more liberal as OC kids become adults
22:14.52MonetTechnobliterator: I think it was in 2012 when I decided rather than voting by party, I'd vote by the content of the manifesto.
22:15.03TybusenThough I think my constituency in southern OC will probably be one of the last to turn blue since it's full of rich white people
22:15.08WormydroidConservative, my town and parish council closed a foodbank and charity because it believed there were no people below the poverty line, but there are
22:15.34TechnobliteratorI wouldn't do that
22:15.45Technobliteratormost of the things this government has done are things that weren't on the manifesto at all
22:15.55Technobliteratortheir manifesto was an outright lie
22:16.01Technobliteratorlikely, so was every party's manifesto
22:16.55MonetI saw a pattern of "Conservatives balance the books, Labour overspends. Tories try balancing the books again"
22:17.37TechnobliteratorThat is a very interesting way of looking at it
22:17.49Technobliteratorconsidering it was Attlee's "overspending" that actually got the deficit down
22:18.03Technobliteratorhonestly, Attlee was the only good prime minister the country ever had
22:21.22MonetA large budget is acceptable when the economy is doing well.
22:21.46TechnobliteratorDoing well? It had just come out of the Great Depression and the Second World War
22:22.32MonetAnd had a large cash injection by the Marshall Plan
22:22.47TechnobliteratorHis government recovered from it, it got people working even after the war time when many soldiers would've lost their war, solved the deficit, and got us social reforms like the NHS
22:23.12TechnobliteratorWhich, by the way, the Conservatives voted against, to which they were referred to as "lower than vermin"
22:23.15MonetThe Marshall Plan was the money the country needed to get back on its feet.
22:24.03TechnobliteratorPaid off pretty well though, didn't it?
22:24.08TechnobliteratorKeynesian economics in action
22:24.33MonetAmerica had the money because it hadn't been half-demolished by the war.
22:24.54TechnobliteratorBecause it had a strong economy thanks to its own Clement Attlee
22:24.54Technobliterator8D
22:25.33MonetThis was also Keynesian economics done right - investing in infrastructure and the right kind of industry.
22:26.26MonetRight now a Keynesian approach to British steel or fishing is a bit of a money sink because that's not where much of Britain's economy now is.
22:26.44TechnobliteratorWell, I think a big criticism of Attlee's government which I agree with was that he didn't do enough infrastructure reform
22:26.52Technobliteratorhe just jumped straight to the social reforms
22:27.32*** join/#sporewiki Wormydroid (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
22:28.00Wormydroidhttps://youtu.be/l7op92W7voE man dresses as dog's favourite chew toy
22:28.28MonetThe best approach to building a nation is to approach Mazlowe's hierarchy.
22:30.25HachimanWormydroid: Adorabel
22:30.49WormydroidIt is
22:31.02WormydroidDogs > humanity
22:31.24MonetThat's what China is doing. Say what you will about the nation's human rights and environmental record, China's poverty rate went from 85% in '81 to ~33% in 08
22:34.33MonetGive the government time and it might start sorting out its environmental record.
22:42.23Tek0516Yay, today I found some non-US politics I can get angry about instead. >.>
22:59.07*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
23:06.32*** join/#sporewiki Wormy_ (516c282b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.108.40.43)
23:06.50Wormy_i
23:07.00Wormy_h
23:08.18The_Randomnessih
23:17.00Wormy_Monet, Xho, Hachiman: http://imgur.com/gallery/SF2cb
23:17.12HachimanAwful
23:17.42MonetI heard
23:18.04MonetWell that's what happens when the cost of importing chocolate takes a hike.
23:25.57MonetAlthough I kind of find it funny how we're screaming out, but Toblerone is Swedish.
23:30.10*** join/#sporewiki Charles_Murray (ad2e68ed@gateway/web/freenode/ip.173.46.104.237)
23:30.27Wormy_http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/582333e91600002f002c95ad.png
23:36.21Tek0516Wormy_: XD
23:36.54The_Randomnesslmao
23:44.28Tek0516https://youtu.be/8ZiI6kVkPXs I blame John Oliver for Trump
23:51.22Wormy_Kanye for President 2020

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.