IRC log for #sporewiki on 20160523

00:00.29*** join/#sporewiki Hellrock (43b553e0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.67.181.83.224)
00:01.13DrodoEmpireHi
00:01.37HellrockHello.
00:12.47DrodoEmpiretest
00:27.35HellrockMeh, does anyone mind if I just show a random video? Just curious to see what everyone thinks.
00:29.46TechnobliteratorUh, no? I mean, if you're not posting offensive material, it won't really bother anywone
00:32.02HellrockI doubt that it contains any offensive material. Just pure silliness.
00:32.09HellrockNo need to worry ^_^
00:32.23DrodoEmpireRight, well, no need to ask
00:33.21TechnobliteratorLike, literally you'd have to either post fetish porn or nazi propaganda for us to really be offended
00:33.42The_Randomnesslol
00:33.46HellrockDoes Mcdonalds count?
00:39.57The_RandomnessDon't worry, you're fine
00:40.30Hellrock👍kk
00:52.05DrodoEmpiretest
01:20.51DrodoEmpire~seen dino82_
01:20.53infobotdino82_ <d8dd47aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.216.221.71.170> was last seen on IRC in channel #sporewiki, 3d 4h 28m 50s ago, saying: 'bbl'.
01:21.11DrodoEmpireHey Hellrock, what's your main fiction?
01:22.24*** join/#sporewiki Hellrock_ (43b553e0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.67.181.83.224)
01:23.15Hellrock_Sorry had an error
01:24.41Hellrock_'_'
01:31.22Wormy_I like how Techno's concept of offensiveness has "fetish porn" up there with Nazi propaganda
01:39.23DrodoEmpirehur
01:39.43DrodoEmpireMeh, fetish porn is gross- Nazi propaganda's just funny
01:40.01DrodoEmpireSo stupid its funny, so I wouldn't even care if you put that up
02:32.38DrodoEmpiretest
03:04.01*** join/#sporewiki The_Randomness (~chatzilla@2601:441:1:5b80:7d16:1696:94e0:f081)
03:04.01*** mode/#sporewiki [+o The_Randomness] by ChanServ
03:04.13The_RandomnessHello
08:21.21*** join/#sporewiki Jepardi (591b4d42@gateway/web/freenode/ip.89.27.77.66)
08:21.22JepardiHi
08:26.42*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
08:30.41ImpyDroidHu
08:30.44ImpyDroidHi
08:30.50ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: https://youtu.be/60S6cbU8Llo
08:32.23Liquid_InkAttacking it's political freedoms is legitimate, although I don't think they should mock the Hajj.
09:04.23ImpyDroidTrue that
09:10.22*** join/#sporewiki Ghelae (0597440c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.68.12)
09:10.22*** mode/#sporewiki [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
09:12.38DrodoEmpireI don't see what's so wrong about mocking a religious belief. :p All religion is an idea, and ideas should be questioned, criticized, and mocked. Just because the idea is especially closely-held by people doesn't spare it from scrutiny
09:13.48DrodoEmpireFrankly, I find the idea of making a pilgrimage to an especially nice-looking rock to be a bit silly- but its their time that they're spending I suppose
09:36.29ImpyDroidWell it is part of their religion
09:36.36ImpyDroidI mean our religion has pilgrimages too
09:36.41ImpyDroidMost religions do
09:37.04ImpyDroidDrodoEmpire: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/a9/fc/fc/a9fcfcbfdefff00516e5004f73c9af60.jpg
09:37.36DrodoEmpireRight, a few things-
09:38.04DrodoEmpireI understand its part of their religion. I still find it silly as I find religion silly (and often dangerous, but that's another topic)
09:38.51DrodoEmpireI also don't get "our religion"- I'm an atheist. :p If you mean Christianity in general (which has influenced western culture immensely) than sure yeah, and I still find it silly
09:39.37ImpyDroidTrue
09:39.38DrodoEmpireAgain, it doesn't bother me so long as religious people keep it to themselves, and in western countries they do
09:46.28ImpyDroidThe context of what Ink said was either worshipping the giant black stone as a sacred relic
09:46.40ImpyDroidOr not letting non-Muslims go to Mecca
09:46.41ImpyDroidNot sure
09:51.29ImpyDroidLiquid_Ink: https://youtu.be/TcdTr_XYm_I Here is one for your country BTW
09:53.07Liquid_InkI saw Murdoch and had a surge of violent thought.
10:33.21*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
11:13.38*** join/#sporewiki Gaseous_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
11:18.32*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@host-92-157-66-217.spbmts.ru)
11:32.59*** join/#sporewiki AdmiralPanda_ (65b18634@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.177.134.52)
11:38.45*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@195.19.236.7)
11:43.33*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@195.19.236.7)
11:45.45*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@195.19.236.7)
11:48.35*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@host-92-157-66-217.spbmts.ru)
12:08.31*** join/#sporewiki AdmiralPanda (65b18634@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.177.134.52)
12:58.38*** join/#sporewiki OluapPlayer (badafdcd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.218.253.205)
12:58.38*** mode/#sporewiki [+o OluapPlayer] by ChanServ
13:00.43AdmiralPandahi u
13:00.54OluapPlayerHi
13:12.30OluapPlayerDid you give up on Dark Souls 3?
13:22.08OluapPlayerTechnobliterator: http://66.media.tumblr.com/d12f6bade4285fb80a701be3a715e48d/tumblr_o7gui7DQMd1qm1mdgo1_1280.jpg
13:22.24Technobliteratorahahahahahaha
13:24.48*** join/#sporewiki Wormy_ (02184654@gateway/web/freenode/ip.2.24.70.84)
13:35.34*** join/#sporewiki Tek0516 (uid149600@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gdrkbgbzeuodpbum)
13:37.20AdmiralPandaI haven't given up on DkS3, in fact I've hardly started it
13:37.30AdmiralPandapeople bugging me to play it killed my interest in it, plus I need to get a controller
13:40.11AdmiralPandabrb
13:41.01*** join/#sporewiki ShogunPanda (65b18634@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.177.134.52)
13:41.26OluapPlayerWell I'm sorry then, I was just wondering since I've only seen you play once
13:45.39ShogunPandaworking up to playing it again, though I do need a new controller
13:50.54*** join/#sporewiki AdmiralPanda (65b18634@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.177.134.52)
13:51.02*** join/#sporewiki Monet (~Monet47@cpc90522-gill20-2-0-cust960.20-1.cable.virginm.net)
13:57.43*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid2 (~Anders@95.140.92.14)
14:00.27MonetHello
14:00.38GhelaeHello.
14:38.20*** join/#sporewiki AdmiralPanda (65b18634@gateway/web/freenode/ip.101.177.134.52)
14:38.23AdmiralPandafuck shogun 2 with a chainsaw
14:38.43Tek0516O.o
14:40.56AdmiralPandadumb thing can't decide if it's running or not running
15:02.08*** join/#sporewiki OluapPlayer (badafdcd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.218.253.205)
15:02.08*** mode/#sporewiki [+o OluapPlayer] by ChanServ
15:22.49Wormy_Kim Jong Un Inspects Nature Museum and Central Zoo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=troGepNWVb0
15:23.03Wormy_The "Zoo" animals looked stuffed to me.
15:23.56Wormy_Looks like they also put prehistoric animals that didn't coexist together
15:38.24*** join/#sporewiki Imperios (~Imperios@95.140.92.14)
15:55.04*** join/#sporewiki Vincent20100 (46506626@gateway/web/freenode/ip.70.80.102.38)
15:55.26MonetTHis makes me want to play rolelrcoaster tycoon
16:28.31*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.14)
16:31.24*** join/#sporewiki Hachiman (5aff2ef1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.90.255.46.241)
16:31.26HachimanHi
16:31.49AdmiralPandahai buniman
16:32.50ImperiosHJi
16:32.51ImperiosHi
16:33.12ImperiosHachiman AdmiralPanda: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-XiccZb7ZU Just watch this
16:34.13Hachimanhur
16:34.29AdmiralPandaif it weren't for the words, that would actually be great Imperium music
16:34.35AdmiralPandawhich is what makes it that much funnier
16:41.54ImperiosWormy_: So I made a joke about America on YT and hordes of Republicans swarmed to say I am a neckbeard SJW Trigglypuff liberal
16:42.06ImperiosFor people who are allegedly against SJWs, they're very easy to trigger
16:42.29Wormy_lol
16:42.44Wormy_I've noticed that
16:44.16ImperiosI'll give them that, because they're always on the assault, they do not feel offended
16:44.26ImperiosBut their trigglypuff tendencies are just directed outwards
16:44.31ImperiosThen again the same can be said of SJWs
16:58.23Wormy_I love it when regressives turn on each other.
16:58.27ImperiosWormy_: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60S6cbU8Llo
16:58.56ImperiosMy dream is a melee a trois between SJWs, Neo-Nazis and Islamists in a controlled environment
16:59.55Wormy_Impy:  Here's an example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqdUmgE1JN4
17:00.00*** join/#sporewiki dino82_ (d8dd47aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.216.221.71.170)
17:01.00Wormy_Huff Post shared a picture of their all women editorial, saying it was equality.  They were all white and so were accused of white privilidge
17:02.00DrodoEmpirelul
17:02.20DrodoEmpireRegressivism sorta consumes itself that way :p
17:03.03Hachiman>all women
17:03.07HachimanAlso not equality
17:04.09DrodoEmpireI'd figure employing whoever's best and not considering race or gender a factor would be equality. :p If the group still turned out to be 100% female then that's fine because they got there by merit
17:05.23Wormy_Treating people as individuals based on their talent, personality, skills and knowledge is surely fairer than picking them by their outward features.
17:05.29DrodoEmpire^
17:06.44dino82_hi all!
17:06.57ImperiosThat being said if you see a group that is not achieving well you ought to do something
17:07.05ImperiosLike invest in their education, do propaganda and shiet
17:07.07ImperiosMy opinion
17:07.14Wormy_I really am disgusted by the concept of reverse racism.  Sorry, but its just racism you egotist moral judges (not any of you guys)
17:07.24DrodoEmpireI agree Wormy
17:08.08HachimanWomen do not not achieve as much as men because they are women though
17:08.18Wormy_Imperios:  If that's happening, there might well have less opportunities or are being picked unfairly, once again by someone choosing them *not* as individuals.
17:08.20HachimanThe women's wage gap doesn't exist after all
17:08.25ImperiosThat too
17:08.50ImperiosI am actually confused about the whole wage gap thing
17:08.54ImperiosI ought to read more on it
17:09.03ImperiosAs far as I understand the fact isthat women in general work less
17:09.13HachimanYes
17:09.23ImperiosWhich is understandable because our society generally implies men have to provide for women because patriarchy and tradition and all that
17:09.24HachimanNot as many women work as men and women tend to work less than men
17:09.33DrodoEmpireAnd Imperios I'd agree but it doesn't make sense to do that to a *group*, as if an entire demographic functions as a class with a similar experience. That being said, however, I am totally in favour of investing in the education of the poor- which would likely affect one demographic if they're for the most part downtrodden
17:09.45Wormy_So do I, I hear people with strong opinions all around me, now I think there may well be truth to it since so many women complain about being paid less.  So that perception is coking from somewhere.
17:09.55Wormy_*coming
17:11.09DrodoEmpireThe earnings gap comes from the individual choices that differ between males and females- females *tend* to get degrees that gets them lower-paying jobs, they *tend* to work less hours on average, that sort of thing
17:11.27DrodoEmpireIts not about wages but earnings- Its illegal to arbitrarily pay someone less by the hour :p
17:11.47Wormy_And yes it is true, the traditions of most societies have men being the providers.  But thats changing at least in Europe and the US, and I hope that barriers to women getting good careers are broken.
17:12.12DrodoEmpire(Meanwhile, men tend to go into more dangerous or higher-paying jobs, and work longer hours. These are all averages though and there's tons and tons of exceptions)
17:12.21HachimanThey cannot be broken because they do not exist
17:12.25DrodoEmpire^
17:12.45*** join/#sporewiki OluapPlayer (badafdcd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.218.253.205)
17:12.45*** mode/#sporewiki [+o OluapPlayer] by ChanServ
17:12.46Wormy_(Yeah, I think the issue arises when women want to have longer working hours and so on)
17:13.16Wormy_Women are taking less traditional roles now
17:13.16DrodoEmpireWell no, they
17:14.04DrodoEmpire*they're perfectly entitled to work very long hours, its just the individual choices of many women is that they don't always work as many as men. Again, there're many exceptions and that's why averages are dangerous things
17:15.54Wormy_And Hachi, are you saying that employers have no biases?  Because in higher paying jobs, there isa inevitably going to be such people who consciously or unconsciously make unfair decisions, based not on individual talent.  Those are the things that mikght be lagging behind.
17:16.05Wormy_*might
17:16.46DrodoEmpireRight, individual employers may have their biases, but so? So does everybody. That's only a "problem" that will be solved with time.
17:17.03DrodoEmpireAnd presuming that these people are sexist or racist is no better
17:17.38Wormy_I agree with the latter part of that.  But when people shot down "oh there is no problem", there is going to be no good understanding between people who think there is, and those who think there is not.
17:18.25Wormy_I'm sure liberal democratic societies have the machinery to solve the issue
17:18.48DrodoEmpireI don't really care if people think anything- Is there or is there not a problem? This is something that can be factually found out
17:19.20DrodoEmpireYes, they can solve the issue of an unknown amount of people maybe having prejudices though some sort of orwellian mechanism. :p
17:20.31AdmiralPandaall we need to do is develop society to the point of true post-scarcity and the irrelevance of individual effort, and then, iunno, we spend all day playing video games or painting or whatever
17:20.50MonetI'd consider that a nightmare personally
17:20.56Wormy_Doesn't have to be any Orwellian mechanism?  The more women take higher paying jobs (and in fact, there is now more women studying STEM degrees in the UK than men), the more there will be and the older generations will be phased out.  Plus with more diversity and understanding, people will be more aware of unconscious biases.
17:20.58AdmiralPandaand after a few thousand years of regression everything collapses because reasons
17:21.01MonetA world that's all leisure? BO-RING!
17:21.40DrodoEmpireWormy_: Right, from how you worded that it almost sounded like you wanted these people weeded out
17:21.45DrodoEmpireSomehow
17:21.58Wormy_I said I disliked reverse racism.
17:22.04DrodoEmpireRight right
17:22.09DrodoEmpireSorry for the mixup
17:22.37Wormy_Or reverse sexism in this case.
17:23.40Wormy_Clue is in the "liberal democracy", I do not consider the Authoritarian left liberal/
17:24.04DrodoEmpireRight, I apologised, I misunderstood, chill :p
17:24.35Wormy_I'm more frustrated with the regressives than by this misunderstanding.
17:25.31Wormy_It is perhaps only through liberal democracy women can take less traditional roles
17:25.43*** join/#sporewiki Ghelae (0597441a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.68.26)
17:25.44*** mode/#sporewiki [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
17:25.45Wormy_In a fair manner
17:25.48Wormy_Hi
17:26.00DrodoEmpireI'm given to agree
17:26.15DrodoEmpireLiberal democracy is egalitarian in nature
17:26.20GhelaeHello. I've just had my final exam.
17:26.28DrodoEmpireAh, very nice
17:27.11Wormy_How did you think it went?
17:28.08GhelaeFairly well. My best exam of the year, I'd say.
17:28.49Wormy_Good
17:29.01GhelaeI'd like to say my best exam ever, because that would be nice, but I can't quite guarantee that.
17:35.26Wormy_Drodro:  Karl Popper's essays on Open Society might interest you, its an attempt to reconcile liberal democracy, social democracy, conservatism and libertarian forms of democracy into a theory http://www.iep.utm.edu/popp-pol/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper#Political_philosophy https://stephenwhitt.wordpress.com/2011/12/09/the-beginning-of-infinity-chapter-fifteen/ http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2016/01/ka
17:37.04DrodoEmpireYeah I've heard some about him
17:40.47DrodoEmpireHm, seems to be against the idea of history as a scientific process- I can't say I totally agree there
17:40.56DrodoEmpireI could easily be wrong though
17:41.21DrodoEmpireSeeing as such a method is quite a ways away from being devised, and any previous method is no doubt tainted by ideology
17:42.40Wormy_Which bit is that?
17:44.41DrodoEmpire"it follows, he argued, that there can be no predictive science of human history."
17:44.45DrodoEmpireI disagree somewhat
17:45.29DrodoEmpireAnd my disagreement may have more to do with me thinking more on the level of geography and anthropology as opposed to pure history but I consider those two disciplines essential in the understanding and analysis of history
17:45.47DrodoEmpireWorld history, that is
17:45.48MonetHe might be talking about patterns in events.
17:46.36MonetOh wait I didn't see the "no" bit
17:46.41GhelaeWhat's the bit before "it follows"; as in, why does he come to that conclusion?
17:47.12Wormy_Ah, I think thats probably part of arguing against induction, which is a philosophy that states that scientific knowledge is extrapolated by previous experiences
17:47.32DrodoEmpire"Since the growth of human knowledge is a causal factor in the evolution of human history, and since "no society can predict, scientifically, its own future states of knowledge","
17:48.00DrodoEmpireThis bit, and I disagree with this statement somewhat as well
17:48.33GhelaeAh. It sounds like he's saying you can't use history to accurately predict the future.
17:48.49Wormy_Which is inductivism
17:49.41GhelaeI wouldn't say that makes history unscientific; even if your idea of history-as-science involves predicting future historical events, it's still not useless in that regard.
17:50.23DrodoEmpireFor me that highly depends on what timescale we're talking about- Naturally, we can't use history to project what human society will be like in the year 3200
17:51.06Wormy_In Karl Popper's conception of science, a scientist makes conjectures that are tested by observation and experiment, but importantly, not derived by past experience or observation.  For Popper, attemptsto justify a hypothesis with such will create biases
17:51.07DrodoEmpireBut we *can* use past events to piece together a likely sequence of events perhaps a decade ahead
17:51.45DrodoEmpireWormy_: I suppose that makes sense
17:52.20Wormy_I think he was against very much Marxism, which saw itself as an evolutionary processes supported by science.  For Popper it was also, psuedoscience
17:52.40GhelaeOf course, the purpose of any discipline is an individual matter for the people conducting... but I'd suggest a better idea of history-as-a-predictive-science would be history that predicts the possible outcome of future historical discoveries.
17:52.49Wormy_*very much against Marxism
17:53.11DrodoEmpireGhel: Makes sense
17:53.56Ghelaee.g. it might predict that a future archaeological excavation of an ancient Roman settlement wouldn't show signs of Chinese influence. So from that point of view, history's ability to predict the state of world affairs in the 33rd century is utterly irrelevant.
17:54.53DrodoEmpireRight
17:56.13GhelaeAnd that even agrees with Popper's idea of falsification: if there did exist a historical theory about Sino-Roman interactions or lack thereof (obviously I know little of this; it's just an example) that predicted such a thing, then it could be falsified by, say, finding a Roman temple filled with Taoist scriptures.
17:56.36DrodoEmpireTrue
17:57.15GhelaeSo, I disagree with the sentiment that history is fundamentally unscientific.
17:57.32DrodoEmpire(Also: The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty did trade with eachother indirectly via the Silk Road/predecessor to the Silk Road, and it would appear both vaguely knew of the other's existence)
17:57.37DrodoEmpire(Just to confirm <.<)
17:58.52Ghelae(Right. Finding a Roman Taoist temple would still be unexpected though. :P)
17:59.13DrodoEmpire(Absolutely)
17:59.15MonetThey didn't have enough contact.
17:59.18DrodoEmpire^
17:59.32DrodoEmpireThere were a lot of central asian peoples preventing any meaningful contact
18:00.05MonetBut they served as an intermediary link. a middle-man
18:00.15DrodoEmpireYeah, exactly
18:01.31Wormy_To explain "no society can predict, scientifically, its own future states of knowledge":  This is basically saying we can't know what we will know in the future, and we can't know what problems we will face.  True, we can make predictions, but we can't justify absolute certainty based on past experiences.  Its like Global Warming, it was occurring while most scientists predicted global cooling would result in an ice age
18:02.05DrodoEmpireRight, right
18:02.11Wormy_bringing civilisation to its knees, and global warming had probably begun before anyone was thinking about long term climatic trends
18:02.21DrodoEmpireOh definitely
18:03.28Wormy_I'm currently in a debate with someone who thinks she can be absolutely certain that Bangladesh will flood permantly, causing millions to move and cause war and poverty on a scale unseen in generations.
18:04.30Wormy_Yet, she cannot be certain that other effects won't reduce that flooding, or that indeed technologies like geoengineering, could well save countries like Bangladesh.
18:04.32DrodoEmpireI mean if she has data to support this then I'd say she can say within a small margin of error that it will
18:04.50DrodoEmpirePerhaps, but what's the timescale on this?
18:05.33Ghelae"small margin of error" is what stops it being "absolutely certain". Actually permanent flooding is hard to justify over the course of eons, though.
18:05.38Wormy_Over this century, most likely.  And Bangladesh may well flood, but her prediction "that millions will die" is more shaky proposition for me
18:06.14Monet"that millions will die" sounds more like a threat for the conesquence if its ignored.
18:06.17DrodoEmpireYeah that's a hasty thing
18:06.30DrodoEmpireBut it *could* easily spark another migrant crisis
18:06.34Wormy_People also predicted in the 1970's that half the world propulation would be starving by now, extrapolated from their present situation.
18:06.44DrodoEmpireMillions of people being displaced as their whole country sinks
18:06.49DrodoEmpireHmm, true
18:07.02DrodoEmpireThey didn't take into account the development of new technologies and practices
18:07.14Wormy_yep
18:08.57*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.14)
18:32.02*** join/#sporewiki Xho (bcddaf46@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.221.175.70)
18:32.46OluapPlayerhi
18:33.17Xhoack
18:37.42Wormy_https://twitter.com/DanielNorero/status/734137995993874433
18:37.56DrodoEmpireolol
18:38.14*** join/#sporewiki ImpyDroid (~Anders@95.140.92.14)
18:46.35Wormy_https://twitter.com/DrFunkySpoon/status/733992261516709889
18:50.01Wormy_my eyes water at its beauty
18:51.18DrodoEmpireJesus- That jet is absolutely *enormous*
18:55.29MonetTidal stresses + low gravity = that.
18:56.58Wormy_this track fits https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XRjdj9AEAA
18:57.55*** join/#sporewiki The_Randomness (~chatzilla@2601:441:1:5b80:603f:b77b:893e:d3ba)
18:57.55*** mode/#sporewiki [+o The_Randomness] by ChanServ
18:58.22The_RandomnessHello
18:59.50Wormy_To exemplify Monet's comment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Enceladus_moon_to_scale-PIA07724.jpg
19:02.12Hachiman>alien ocean
19:02.18HachimanOluap will have a fucking panic attack
19:02.39HachimanAbyss full of ayy lmaos
19:02.41OluapPlayerEh?
19:03.02Hachimancus ur fear of oceans
19:03.07Hachimanand space
19:03.34OluapPlayerI'm not afraid of the ocean, i'm afraid of the deep sea
19:03.38Wormy_Yet it probably contains a significant fraction of Earth's volume of water, or possibly more.  Though most of it would be frozen
19:03.48Wormy_*surface volume
19:03.58MonetFear of the abyss.
19:43.58ImperiosMonet Hachiman: http://cs633131.vk.me/v633131109/2d7e4/B7yXkuiFInM.jpg So I and a few friends of mine participated in a comic making contest yesterday as part of Comic-Con; each had to provide an OC, and I provided Thessina
19:48.36MonetThe guy in Panel 4 brings all the girls.
19:49.10XhoImperios: there is no god
19:52.37Monethttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/05/inside-virtual-realitys-brewing-piracy-and-exclusivity-arms-race/?utm_content=bufferee6aa&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer Oculus just got busted
19:52.40ImperiosThessina's giant eyes devour all life
19:55.18ImperiosShe'll probably have a few moe moments
19:55.21MonetThe console war scarred a generation. So any effort to avert a VR headset war is good diplomacy in my books.
20:11.25OluapPlayerXho Hachiman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pwe2ORfqLs
20:11.45HachimanOh God
20:24.27DrodoEmpiretest
20:57.23*** join/#sporewiki Charles_Murray (495c6351@gateway/web/freenode/ip.73.92.99.81)
20:58.04Wormy_Hachiman:  Bobby Beale kills again
20:58.35DrodoEmpireHi charles
20:58.40Wormy_A good blood splattering for Eastenders, it was.
20:59.11DrodoEmpireHm, Wormy_ and Ghel and anybody else who knows this sorta thing- How would one even produce or maintain an antimatter weapon? How would you contain the antimatter in the warhead?
20:59.37GhelWith great difficulty.
20:59.42Wormy_Containing antimatter is probably much easier than producing or collecting it
21:00.01DrodoEmpireProbably
21:00.02GhelYes; containing it could be done with a magnetic trap.
21:00.16DrodoEmpireHmm, okay
21:01.10GhelYou do still need to have a very good vacuum, though: the trap keeps anti-matter atoms away from the walls of your container, but that's all.
21:01.18DrodoEmpireSo an antimatter torpedo in and of itself might be a reasonably-simple weapon, though I don't like the idea of an active system needing to keep the thing from blowing up (a magnet needs to keep running)
21:01.25DrodoEmpireThat's just really bad engineering. >.<
21:01.37GhelYes; even nuclear weapons have failsafes.
21:01.43Wormy_It would be a very dangerous payload to say the least
21:02.03GhelAn alternative would be if there were some way to rapidly convert large amounts of matter into antimatter.
21:02.20DrodoEmpireRight
21:02.22GhelIn that case, you wouldn't need any antimatter in your weapon until it was at least en route to the target.
21:02.33HachimanThere is an easy solution
21:02.34Wormy_The main natural source of antimatter would be stars, but even then collection would take a long time.
21:02.35HachimanMAGIC
21:02.38The_Randomnesszz
21:02.38HachimanSPACE MAGIC
21:02.52DrodoEmpireWould there be any process that could rapidly convert matter to antimatter in that way Ghel?
21:03.07The_RandomnessDrodoEmpire: Not unless you want to terribly break conservation laws, I'd imagine
21:03.15The_RandomnessI think
21:03.21DrodoEmpirePutting any other concern like cost of miniturization aside
21:03.30DrodoEmpire*cost or miniturization
21:03.41Wormy_I tried http://spore.wikia.com/wiki/Fiction:Delpha_Coalition_of_Planets/Technology/Industry#Matter.2FAntimatter_conversion:_Reversing_chirality
21:04.26GhelYou can do it without breaking conservation laws, although not via perturbative processes (i.e. the ones you can draw Feynmann diagrams of).
21:04.44The_RandomnessRight
21:04.49Wormy_Which is the method I used, as stated, it doesn't quite work
21:05.17DrodoEmpireHm.
21:05.22GhelQ-balls could work. I think skyrmions are another defect that might.
21:06.22DrodoEmpireIn terms of production, what *would* the primary method be?
21:06.35DrodoEmpireI think the article mentioned really particle accelerators
21:06.45DrodoEmpire*reallg big
21:06.46DrodoEmpire*y
21:06.55GhelIf you don't have a matter-to-antimatter conversation device, really big particle accelerators would work.
21:07.03Wormy_Easiest by far would be to collect antimatter particles created by stars with huge magmetic traps and wires
21:07.08GhelI'd suggest putting it in orbit of the sun with a huge solar panel array.
21:07.24GhelOr, yes, you could collect them from space radiation.
21:07.32GhelPreferably by having the collector in orbit.
21:07.33DrodoEmpireSo I mean, I suppose the most straightforward solution would be enormous, hyperefficient particle accelerators
21:07.39GhelPowered by a huge solar panel array.
21:07.52DrodoEmpireOr that Wormy_
21:08.49*** join/#sporewiki Xho (bcddaf46@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.221.175.70)
21:09.29GhelThe individual accelerators themselves don't necessarily need to be very large - the LHC is way longer than you need for creating antimatter - but you'd need a huge number of them to produce it in a significant amount.
21:09.58GhelAlthough if you do have a really long linear accelerator, you can put more energy into each collision and thereby get more particles out.
21:09.58DrodoEmpireFair enough
21:10.40Wormy_What is the flaw with this method again?   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-orientable_wormhole#Consequences
21:10.57DrodoEmpireSeeing as the Drodo regularly construct orbital rings around their major worlds (with space elevators connected on to them), they definitely have the industrial capacity for such mass-production of accelerators
21:11.20GhelWormy_: a) antiparticles aren't just chirality-reversed particles; b) the Higgs mechanism flips particles between their two chiralities all the time anyway.
21:11.33Wormy_I see
21:12.44GhelAn orbital ring could even have accelerators going around it, if there's room to spare (it's not like particle accelerators need to have a very large diameter).
21:13.09Wormy_I wonder if I could make another use ut of non-orientable wormholes
21:14.27GhelThere's the "mirror matter" scenario, but that's all I can remember: https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0896
21:15.41GhelOtherwise, they're just wormholes that make life inconvenient for people who pass through them by swapping left and right.
21:15.45XhoMan Game of Thrones tonight
21:15.47Xhothat was just
21:15.48GhelMight be good for practical jokes.
21:16.45Wormy_Isn't mirror matter supposed to only weakly interact with "normal" matter?
21:17.10GhelYes.
21:17.31GhelSo it'd be a bit like ghost-phasing.
21:17.56Wormy_That's what I'm thinking.
21:19.25GhelEssentially, you'd be turning yourself into dark matter.
21:19.54GhelIf dark matter were the result of mirror matter, all of the "normal" universe would become invisible and intangible to you, but you'd have access to the world of dark matter instead.
21:20.09Wormy_Ooh
21:20.25Wormy_You know we never really explored dark matter in SporeWiki physics or tech
21:21.20Charles_MurrayWell, we did have it manifest itself in hyperspace in the form of hyperspatial fog
21:21.31Wormy_Of course, it would look like the same stuff as our portion of the universe, only the structure of the universe would be far denser
21:21.44Wormy_Thats true
21:22.33Wormy_Dark matter could be a number of things.
21:23.45OluapPlayerSneaky hidden matter that explodes violently upon touch
21:24.07Wormy_That...  Wouldn't happen.
21:24.20OluapPlayerThat's no fun then
21:25.10XhoTourettes Guy remixes are making a comeback I see
21:25.40GhelWhile we do have an explanation for dark matter in the form of hypermatter, I don't think we've ever explained how ships get into hyperspace in the first place.
21:25.43OluapPlayerI always heard matter and dark matter annihilate each other upon contact releasing a ginormous amount of energy
21:25.54The_Randomnessno, that's matter/antimatter
21:26.00OluapPlayerOh
21:26.01OluapPlayerOH
21:26.06The_Randomnessmatter doesn't even interact with dark matter as far as we know
21:26.21OluapPlayerGod how did I not notice it was "dark" and not "anti"
21:26.29GhelSo, although I don't think it would realistically work (especially not with how hyperspace is currently described), we could say that non-orientable wormholes take ships into hyperspace.
21:26.45Wormy_Only gravitationally
21:26.46OluapPlayerI knew of this, yet it went over my head completely
21:26.49GhelThen hyperspace fog is mirror matter is dark matter.
21:26.53OluapPlayerNow I'm embarrassed
21:27.14The_RandomnessYeah, only gravitationally
21:27.45GhelDark matter could interact with matter, very weakly, although we don't know. That is the hope of the experiments searching for it.
21:27.52The_RandomnessYeah
21:29.27HachimanPhotino Birds ahoy
21:29.35OluapPlayerNow I know I'm completely disconnected from science
21:29.44OluapPlayerI used to be a massive nerd about this kind of thing
21:29.56*** join/#sporewiki Imperios (~Imperios@95.140.92.14)
21:30.08XhoDark matter is mostly theoretical from what I gather
21:30.25GhelIn the sense that it hasn't been directly detected, yes.
21:30.29OluapPlayerDark matter is completely theoretical, there's no proof of its existence
21:30.48The_Randomnessyes there is
21:31.05OluapPlayerHow so, if it has never been detected?
21:31.08HachimanThere is only firm evidence pointing towards its existence - what it is and what it does is yet to be discovered
21:31.10GhelAlthough it's a bit like saying normal matter is only theorised to explain the fact that we can perceive things, therefore we suppose that it is made out of some "matter".
21:31.18Wormy_There is a huge body of evidence that it exists, like the rotational speed of galaxies
21:31.22The_Randomness^
21:31.39OluapPlayerI don't see how that confirms it but whatever
21:31.41GhelThe summary is that, not only is known matter insufficient to produce observed gravitational effects, it's also in the wrong place.
21:31.44Wormy_However, like many things in science, it is not directly detectable or observed.
21:32.16DrodoEmpireOluapPlayer: ...Because the rotational speed of galaxies can only be explained through its existence
21:32.24DrodoEmpireAlong with many many other phenomena
21:32.32XhoLike Kim Kardashian
21:32.33Xhoc
21:32.40OluapPlayerNot up for this kind of discussion
21:32.47Wormy_We don't know what dark matter is, of course.
21:32.47OluapPlayerHence whatever
21:32.48HachimanKanye West is actually a being of pure dark matter
21:33.04Xhoomg cuz hes black innit
21:33.11DrodoEmpireIts a different *sort* of observation but still an observation
21:34.15HachimanThe cause and effects of his ego cannot be created or influenced by conventional matter, thus he is a dark matter entity
21:35.08Wormy_If we had strong gravitational senses, we would likely experience dark matter as easily as we see the Milky Way.
21:35.31XhoHachiman: Therefore                Kanye West is a Xhodocto
21:35.39OluapPlayerNo
21:35.43OluapPlayerKanye is a Taldar
21:35.45OluapPlayerThat's canon
21:35.50Xhobut r taldar xhodocto tho
21:35.51HachimanOh yeah hur
21:35.56OluapPlayerno
21:36.04Xhobut r we all xhodocto tho
21:36.08OluapPlayerno
21:36.11Xhoy not
21:36.49XhoThe Xhodocto don't exist                        therefore neither does Kanye            *DUNNNNN*
21:36.55OluapPlayerAmen
21:36.59Wormy_This conversation sank from academic to hm, internet talk very quickly
21:37.13Xhostrikes again
21:37.16HachimanWormy's getting PISSED
21:37.24OluapPlayerI'm done
21:37.25Wormy_Good idea
21:37.41Xhobad idea bad wormy
21:37.41Xhobad
21:37.44Wormy_I might just do that
21:37.48OluapPlayerWow, okay then
21:37.50HachimanIt's a MONDAY
21:37.57HachimanYou don't get pissed on a Monday
21:38.02Wormy_You don't.
21:38.06Wormy_Lightweight
21:38.28HachimanI feel like I just got roasted
21:38.29Wormy_Did Oluap believe that?
21:38.35Xho"THE ͏DAY̵S ̨HA̶V͡E ̴N͢Ǫ ҉ME͠ANI͝NG̢ ̕W̕HEN ALC̶OH̴O̧L I̶S IN͟V͜O̵LV̷E̶D, THE ̸V͜OI̴D ̴IS ͜A͏T̸ T͏HE ͝B͏O̡T̕T̨O͞M ͞ǪF̸ ̛Á ̵GLA͢SS" - Wormulon, 2016
21:40.19XhoWell
21:40.22XhoIt was going that way
21:41.08*** join/#sporewiki Wormy__ (02184654@gateway/web/freenode/ip.2.24.70.84)
21:43.19XhoWell
21:43.27XhoOdd IRC discussion anyway
21:44.31Wormy_Just another day here
21:44.44DrodoEmpireAnd *I* started it >:D
21:44.56Xhono re
21:46.25The_RandomnessThis is interesting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyitF-6tBu4
21:47.27ImperiosHachiman: "The cause and effects of his ego cannot be created or influenced by conventional matter, thus he is a dark matter entity"
21:47.27Wormy_http://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED162/56018c7821cce.jpeg
21:47.33ImperiosWhat about Justin Bieber
21:47.53HachimanYou're comparing Bieber to Kanye
21:48.16XhoThat's like comparing a shit to a turd
21:48.18ImperiosThey share an ego
21:48.23ImperiosAnd what Xho said
21:48.28HachimanTrue
21:48.31ImperiosIT is hard to differentiate between various forms of bad
21:48.40Imperios*their inflated ego
21:49.09Imperioshttps://youtu.be/1zQkzPyRuTc?t=36 ...Actually
21:49.16Imperios...His new voice is... okay
21:49.38XhoJustin Bieber can sing no doubt but still
21:49.49HachimanHe went from imbecile to idiot
21:49.50ImperiosI mean he started singing like a man
21:50.02ImperiosAnd started expressing some emotions in his singing
21:50.14ImperiosI still want to see him in a metal band
21:50.29XhoSTOP MESSING WITH WESTERN CULTURE
21:50.47Xhothis kills the xho
21:51.06Wormy_He has already claimed to be a rockstar.
21:51.13ImperiosSUPELIOL EASTELN CULTULE WILL DESTROY ZE PITIFUR WEST
21:51.18HachimanBut his music has nothing to do with rock
21:52.06Wormy_Its like when Kanye declared himself the king of rock after Lemmy played at Glastonbury
21:53.02Wormy_Funny year that, the Dalai Lama, Kanye West and Lemmy on stage
21:53.14HachimanYeah, that was an odd year
22:15.55GhelThe_Randomness: So I've just watched that video you linked to. I'm sure it's useful to talk about, and even have a name for, violation of freedom of choice (and, indeed, "violence" and "violation" do share a common etymology).
22:16.27GhelWhether it should be called "violence", or whether violence is merely an apt metaphor... hmm.
22:16.47The_RandomnessYeah, I'm not expecting you to agree/disagree with it, but it's certainly worth thinking about
22:18.20The_RandomnessPersonally, I agree with the points he brought up in the video, i.e. violence is all about the denial of choice, but I also think that violence in certain situations is justified
22:19.00The_Randomnesse.g. paying taxes - either you pay them or you get arrested, but it's necessary for our society to exist
22:20.20Wormy_3 minutes in, comparing doing art to cruelty, ugh
22:24.20GhelWormy_: I think the person who wrote that was writing a blatant artistic metaphor.
22:25.19Wormy_I'm not really a fan of that kind of philosophy
22:28.03Wormy_But I suppose there is a lot of hidden evils people do that limit other people.
22:28.48Wormy_Like they say in the end, fascism most needs an unquestioning or charmed populace
22:34.33The_RandomnessRight
23:28.35*** join/#sporewiki Liquid_Ink (79d0cd9d@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.205.157)
23:29.01Wormy_hi
23:36.22*** join/#sporewiki dino82_ (d8dd47aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.216.221.71.170)
23:44.48dino82_hi
23:45.49DrodoEmpireHi
23:51.48Wormy_Huh https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13226913_1395590430461964_1111566664702181213_n.jpg?oh=6fb2bd213392f885c8470726126a9e8e&oe=57DCB097
23:55.03DrodoEmpireAYY LMAO

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.