| 00:05.02 | *** join/#bzflag alpha1-2 (~nb_j@host210.190-230-244.telecom.net.ar) |
| 00:19.02 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: I suspect it has something to do with SDL rather than bzflag. I have a dual-screen setup. When I turn off the external monitor with xrandr, everything works. With both screens: When I enable '-d', bzflag only completely "takes control" of one screen (and leaves an empty black window on the other screen), and everything works. When I start with without the '-d' and depending on the display format/resolution I set in bzflag, things either wor |
| 00:19.16 | JeffM2501 | ryanakca, yeah I'd guess that |
| 00:19.53 | JeffM2501 | we don't do much with the mouse other then get told where it is when SDL is on |
| 00:19.54 | ryanakca | It might even have something to do with my display manager (xmonad) and to which window it assigns focus |
| 00:20.12 | JeffM2501 | works fine in windows :) |
| 00:22.29 | ryanakca | Seeing that I have a rather unusual setup, and it's not bzflag's fault, I'll proceed with the upload. Thanks for the help |
| 00:22.36 | JeffM2501 | sure |
| 00:22.54 | JeffM2501 | when will unstable be stable? next year? |
| 00:23.58 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: I'm not sure. There was talk of having a release every two years, but I don't know how well that will work out |
| 00:24.18 | ryanakca | I also don't know how many people actually use "stable" vs "unstable" given the length of time between releases... |
| 00:24.36 | JeffM2501 | I'm just curious what the minium time between our release and a package getting into a released debian wold be? |
| 00:28.35 | ryanakca | Basically however long there is remaining until Debian releases. If you're wondering how long it would take to get it into Debian unstable (assuming I'm not in the middle of exams), anywhere from under a day to a week, depending on how busy I am. |
| 00:29.45 | JeffM2501 | no, not your work, just the cycle of debian |
| 00:30.19 | *** join/#bzflag spldart (~james@bzflag/contributor/spldart) |
| 00:30.19 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v spldart] by ChanServ |
| 00:30.28 | ryanakca | If you want packages compiled for the latest stable release, I can always upload to http://backports.debian.org/ |
| 00:30.28 | JeffM2501 | trying to see how the debian release cycle can work for games that want to be updated in a timly manner, and from what you are saying that sounds like it means "shoot for unstable and stable happens when stable happens" |
| 00:30.41 | JeffM2501 | how many users enable backports? |
| 00:31.09 | spldart | ?_? |
| 00:31.34 | blast007 | backports is a better option than making everyone run unstable so they can actually play ;) |
| 00:31.45 | spldart | Deb 7.0 just came out. next release is WAY to unstable to be thinking about builds yet methinks. |
| 00:31.59 | ryanakca | I'm not sure, but you can instruct people to enable them via http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ from http://bzflag.org/ |
| 00:32.01 | JeffM2501 | well we can't make anyone run anything, that's my concern :) |
| 00:32.09 | spldart | Indeed |
| 00:32.19 | JeffM2501 | how does debian feel about apps that update themselves? |
| 00:32.31 | spldart | And that's a good question |
| 00:32.32 | blast007 | JeffM2501: with backports, you can selectively just pull certain stuff from there |
| 00:32.43 | JeffM2501 | I know |
| 00:32.58 | JeffM2501 | just trying to put my mind in the average debian user, my guess is they are pretty used to that |
| 00:33.24 | spldart | Average debian user... Hrmph... That shouldn't be to hard. |
| 00:34.07 | ryanakca | That functionality gets patched out, at least in my experience, because of users submitting bug reports to Debian about the self-updated app (which has nothing to do with Debian), etc. |
| 00:34.35 | ryanakca | In any case, I'd say that backports.d.o is probably your best bet if you want "stable" users to have the latest-and-greatest version. |
| 00:34.39 | spldart | They are a bit behind the more hip repo's and releases but feel a bit elite. Not as elite as some distro's though. The quote |
| 00:34.46 | spldart | kewl ones /quote |
| 00:35.06 | spldart | 'me'... think its awesome to be 6 months ahead of the stable release |
| 00:35.14 | JeffM2501 | oh so you guys remove that feature... wow |
| 00:35.22 | JeffM2501 | scratches debian off the list |
| 00:35.45 | JeffM2501 | well for bzflag I think that the debian users are used to being unloved and just build from sources |
| 00:35.57 | JeffM2501 | Tim took care of that a couple years ago |
| 00:36.02 | spldart | Oh.. Uhm... My sarcasm is on overdrive... I should shaddup.. Anywho... debian. Most that would ask question's here are at the end of the 6.0 usage and into their 7.0... But would know better than to ask about testing right now |
| 00:36.29 | spldart | Now... testing a year from now... yes |
| 00:36.35 | spldart | I can see that |
| 00:37.03 | spldart | sry.. sry... I'm goin on.. sry. |
| 00:37.53 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: Yes, bzflag packages in Debian (and thus in Ubuntu) were in a very very sorry state until recently. But going forward, unstable users will have access to up-to-date packages, and stable users can get the latest version from backports. |
| 00:38.04 | ryanakca | Problem solved. |
| 00:38.20 | spldart | backports isn't always a problem solved situation... |
| 00:38.23 | JeffM2501 | that is better, I'd not say "solved" :) |
| 00:38.24 | spldart | in my experience |
| 00:38.46 | JeffM2501 | it's just that the update system for debian is more talored to applications not games, I understand |
| 00:39.05 | spldart | Ubuntu was a better direction to stay closer to update... on repos... or at least my understanding. |
| 00:39.12 | spldart | err.. uh... sry |
| 00:39.25 | ryanakca | spldart: The Ubuntu package was copied directly from Debian ;) |
| 00:39.35 | spldart | But it's much newer |
| 00:39.45 | spldart | I'm constantly stealing from ubuntu repo's |
| 00:39.47 | JeffM2501 | yeah but they do it more often |
| 00:39.51 | JeffM2501 | so it's less of a problem |
| 00:39.56 | ryanakca | spldart: They've also released twice since I uploaded 2.4.2 to Debian |
| 00:40.08 | JeffM2501 | the deleting of the update code is what bothers me most |
| 00:40.08 | blast007 | spldart: Ubuntu pulls from Debian Testing |
| 00:40.22 | spldart | again.. ubuntu is newer and more stable with that newer... imho |
| 00:40.23 | JeffM2501 | some game types would require all users to be on the same version for network compatability |
| 00:40.31 | JeffM2501 | so no WOW on debian |
| 00:40.37 | spldart | hehe |
| 00:41.20 | *** join/#bzflag drizzo4shizzo (~dan@pool-74-96-158-123.washdc.fios.verizon.net) |
| 00:41.20 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: AFAIK, the same patching out would happen in Ubuntu. |
| 00:41.34 | JeffM2501 | that is also unforntonate |
| 00:41.59 | JeffM2501 | what if it did not patch the files in the package but just downloaded new ones, or gave the user the option to pull a git or svn repository and build? |
| 00:42.00 | ryanakca | Unless the self-updating code has the package recompile, I don't see a way for you to ensure that libraries match up, etc. |
| 00:42.03 | spldart | ergh... word salad.. sry. But yeah... I have theived from ubuntu repos on numerous occasions for binaries and their dependencies... testing in debian is a dice toss. Especially early in that 2 year release cycle. |
| 00:42.30 | JeffM2501 | ryanakca, oh that's easy, don't use a language that has all those nasy library problems :) |
| 00:42.48 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: Are you planning a complete rewrite? ;) |
| 00:43.01 | JeffM2501 | I never said it was for this project ;) |
| 00:43.26 | JeffM2501 | again these are mostly curiosity questions |
| 00:43.34 | JeffM2501 | but yes we did evaluate a rewrite |
| 00:43.42 | JeffM2501 | it's not off the table |
| 00:44.51 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: If you really want to ensure an up-to-date-all-of-the-time program, you'll need to setup a seperate repository from which users install, and rebuild a new package every day / every time you make a change. |
| 00:45.24 | spldart | o_O |
| 00:45.26 | JeffM2501 | what if the package is just the updater and it is what brings in the other code |
| 00:45.37 | JeffM2501 | same kind of deal just with a package to get you started |
| 00:45.53 | JeffM2501 | and to ensure the proper dependencies |
| 00:47.32 | spldart | :) |
| 00:52.58 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: Then that would go into Debian contrib (ยง2.2.2 http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html) if it got into Debian at all. It would be similar to http://packages.debian.org/sid/googleearth-package or http://packages.debian.org/sid/flashplugin-nonfree |
| 00:53.16 | JeffM2501 | yet it would be free ;) |
| 00:53.20 | JeffM2501 | I understand |
| 00:53.34 | JeffM2501 | don't bother submititing it to debian it doesn't fit |
| 00:54.30 | JeffM2501 | that steam thing probably has similar problems |
| 00:54.43 | ryanakca | If the code in the package downloading the file(s) is free, then yes, that section is free. But if it requires something that can't be built within Debian or fetches non-free stuff, etc, then it belongs in "contrib" rather than in "main". |
| 00:55.11 | JeffM2501 | oh everything could be built in debian and would have full source code |
| 00:55.39 | JeffM2501 | builds fine right from the .sln file |
| 01:06.14 | ryanakca | 21:03:25 < BTS> bzflag 2.4.2+ds1-2 uploaded by Ryan Kavanagh (rak) (Closes: #600307, #699707) http://packages.qa.debian.org/bzflag |
| 01:07.07 | ryanakca | (the rest of the metadata on that page, e.g., under general, versions, todo, etc. should update within the next 24 hours) |
| 01:08.36 | *** join/#bzflag alpha1-2 (~nb_j@host210.190-230-244.telecom.net.ar) |
| 01:13.14 | ryanakca | Has bzflag been rewriten from scratch / majorly rewriten in its history? |
| 01:13.22 | JeffM2501 | once |
| 01:13.26 | JeffM2501 | before it was open source |
| 01:15.51 | ryanakca | Alright. I was just wondering how many of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=bzflag;dist=unstable could be closed due to "rewrite". Obviously, 181111 gets closed (not a bug), 394774 will get closed since it's 7 years old and nobody has had a similar issue, etc. |
| 01:16.32 | JeffM2501 | oh we haven't fixed many real bugs in years :) |
| 01:16.35 | *** join/#bzflag Pimpinella (~frank@gondolin.pimpi.org) |
| 01:17.37 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: Did http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=408904 ever get done? |
| 01:18.07 | JeffM2501 | no, that'd be supid to implement |
| 01:18.18 | JeffM2501 | you can silence people on your local client |
| 01:18.20 | ryanakca | Alright, closing. |
| 01:18.46 | JeffM2501 | anything that isn't debian specific on there will be ignored by us unless it gets reported on SF |
| 01:19.01 | ryanakca | Yes |
| 01:19.11 | blast007 | additionally, when someone is "muted" on a server it only lasts until they rejoin |
| 01:20.25 | JeffM2501 | it's not the server's jop to protect you from being offended, you have the choice to not listen |
| 01:20.44 | ryanakca | nods |
| 01:20.56 | ryanakca | I don't really care about the bug, I'm just trying to clear out clutter off of the bug list. |
| 01:21.32 | JeffM2501 | only a few of those are really yours |
| 01:21.54 | JeffM2501 | menu file, unompressed files, and the package ones |
| 01:22.07 | ryanakca | JeffM2501: This sound familiar? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292279 |
| 01:22.30 | JeffM2501 | vaugely |
| 01:22.32 | JeffM2501 | I'd delete it |
| 01:25.46 | ryanakca | Done |
| 01:48.18 | spldart | Hrmph.... |
| 01:48.39 | spldart | a general hrmph... sry... didn't mean tha... ignore that.. sry |
| 01:48.49 | *** mode/#bzflag [-v short_circuit] by ChanServ |
| 02:04.11 | *** join/#bzflag unclelightning (~chatzilla@pool-64-222-241-185.port.east.myfairpoint.net) |
| 02:04.29 | Notify | 03BZFlag:bullet_catcher * 22771 trunk/bzflag/src/bzfs/CmdLineOptions.cxx: Remove "const" from the modifiable array of bzfs options. |
| 02:47.53 | *** join/#bzflag jeffmOSX (~jeffm@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 02:51.34 | allejo | it's always nice to have three jeffs around |
| 02:53.09 | short_circuit | heh |
| 02:53.44 | allejo | JeffM2501, JeffM, and jeffmOSX |
| 02:54.06 | jeffmOSX | you have 4 |
| 02:58.58 | allejo | who's the 4th? |
| 03:01.57 | BulletCatcher | Do we still need the "hack to invalidate decorative meshes on older clients" in CustomMesh::writeToGroupDef()? |
| 03:04.44 | blast007 | allejo: you'll know if you look in the AUTHORS file ;) |
| 03:06.09 | allejo | woah i didn't know bc made the 4th jeff ._. |
| 03:08.17 | jeffmOSX | BulletCatcher, what does it do |
| 03:08.25 | jeffmOSX | but probably not |
| 03:11.13 | BulletCatcher | If I understand correctly, it makes "decorative" drawInfo items invisible. |
| 03:11.26 | BulletCatcher | Or simply not there. |
| 03:12.45 | BulletCatcher | I don't know anything about drawInfo, so I don't know how I would test removing the hack. |
| 03:15.28 | jeffmOSX | let me get latest and look |
| 03:20.09 | jeffmOSX | I think I understand why it does it, I have to check the client now to ensure it makes them passable |
| 03:21.02 | jeffmOSX | but I'm not sure if it's the right thing to do |
| 03:21.23 | jeffmOSX | the mesh in a draw info can be used as a bounding mesh |
| 03:21.31 | jeffmOSX | or should be able to be used as a bounding mesh |
| 03:26.04 | jeffmOSX | I think we can remove it |
| 03:26.37 | jeffmOSX | the clients should all use the same code now and it can be up to the map if the object is passable |
| 03:27.28 | jeffmOSX | the hack was to force all clients to treat the item as passable since old clients always did |
| 03:28.01 | jeffmOSX | but I need to verify how 'decorative' is set |
| 03:28.20 | jeffmOSX | agh it's a flag |
| 03:28.38 | jeffmOSX | honestly I'd just remove the client and leave the code as a consistency check |
| 03:29.02 | jeffmOSX | sorry remove the comment not client |
| 03:30.42 | jeffmOSX | decorative is not sent to the client so passable would be the only way to send it |
| 03:31.20 | *** join/#bzflag swigg__ (~swigg@68-119-228-196.dhcp.ahvl.nc.charter.com) |
| 03:40.41 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM_ (~JeffM@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 05:43.58 | *** join/#bzflag alpha1-2 (~nb_j@host210.190-230-244.telecom.net.ar) |
| 05:49.28 | alpha1-2 | is it the language plugin still active? |
| 05:49.36 | alpha1-2 | (hi) |
| 05:52.19 | *** join/#bzflag tw1sted (~tw1sted@pool-74-101-150-159.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 05:56.49 | JeffM_ | language? |
| 05:56.59 | alpha1-2 | about bad language |
| 05:57.41 | JeffM_ | who wrote it? |
| 05:58.06 | alpha1-2 | I readed a post from december and it seems by blast007 |
| 05:58.23 | JeffM_ | readed? |
| 05:58.33 | JeffM_ | I don't think that's a word |
| 05:58.37 | alpha1-2 | "swearSupressor" I think |
| 05:59.00 | JeffM_ | he would have checked it in if he wanted it to be kept development |
| 05:59.14 | alpha1-2 | noh sorry "read", thx, I want to improve my english :P |
| 05:59.19 | alpha1-2 | oh* |
| 06:00.02 | JeffM_ | or put it on bitbucket but I have not heard anything about it recently |
| 06:00.51 | alpha1-2 | are you saying that it was on in december and off now? |
| 06:01.19 | JeffM_ | I'm saying I don' tknow for sure, but if you have not seen any new posts then it's proably in the same state as it was then |
| 06:01.32 | JeffM_ | unless it was checked in to the source tree |
| 06:01.41 | alpha1-2 | oh |
| 06:02.13 | alpha1-2 | what are the files where the server has the bad word list and what is the source of the plug in supresor? |
| 06:03.10 | alpha1-2 | if you know |
| 06:03.34 | JeffM_ | did the post link to sourcecode? |
| 06:04.18 | alpha1-2 | I didn't see it |
| 06:05.05 | JeffM_ | it's not checked in |
| 06:05.13 | JeffM_ | so it may never have been released |
| 06:06.15 | alpha1-2 | strange, because on december a player was complaining about it :P |
| 06:06.46 | JeffM_ | that can still happen even if it was not released to the plublic |
| 06:07.06 | alpha1-2 | it is any that supress the whole msg instead of the bad word |
| 06:07.13 | *** join/#bzflag Marzipan (~Marzipan@sign-4db604ba.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 06:07.29 | JeffM_ | not with out the plugin |
| 06:07.29 | alpha1-2 | see the post lps: |
| 06:07.32 | alpha1-2 | pls* |
| 06:07.35 | alpha1-2 | ... |
| 06:07.46 | alpha1-2 | http://forums.bzflag.org/viewtopic.php?f=103&t=18358&hilit=bad+language |
| 06:07.49 | JeffM_ | I have seen the post |
| 06:08.43 | JeffM_ | I do not see that it was released publicly |
| 06:08.58 | alpha1-2 | but dexter is complaining about it |
| 06:09.18 | JeffM_ | what does that have to do with if it was released or not |
| 06:09.46 | alpha1-2 | oh do you mean that blast was tesing it in match servers? |
| 06:09.55 | alpha1-2 | *just testing* |
| 06:09.56 | JeffM_ | or he wrote it for them |
| 06:10.10 | JeffM_ | an author does not have to release the code publicly |
| 06:11.13 | alpha1-2 | sorry I am not undersdanding what you mean |
| 06:11.27 | alpha1-2 | understanding* |
| 06:11.33 | JeffM_ | just because a server runs a plugin does not mean that other servers can run it as well |
| 06:11.47 | JeffM_ | the writer of a plugin does not have to give the code for it to others |
| 06:12.11 | alpha1-2 | it isn't GPL? |
| 06:12.21 | JeffM_ | it may nor may not be |
| 06:12.29 | JeffM_ | plug-ins are not part of the main game |
| 06:12.35 | JeffM_ | and can be licensed seperately |
| 06:12.48 | alpha1-2 | oh ok, cause of LGPL right? |
| 06:13.10 | JeffM_ | that and the fact that it may not contain any bzflag code |
| 06:13.34 | JeffM_ | the GPL also does not say that the source has to be public, only that the source code goes with the binary version |
| 06:13.44 | alpha1-2 | it is considered as any independent code ? |
| 06:13.49 | alpha1-2 | is it* |
| 06:14.14 | JeffM_ | they can be if they do not derive from any of our bzflag code |
| 06:14.40 | alpha1-2 | ok |
| 06:15.42 | alpha1-2 | well, about liberate the code, in general , all code GPL is publically edited |
| 06:15.50 | JeffM_ | nope |
| 06:15.55 | JeffM_ | that is not part of the license |
| 06:16.11 | alpha1-2 | well, I mean, potentially :) |
| 06:16.14 | JeffM_ | it simply states that the code has to go with the binary and the author can not restrict how it it used |
| 06:16.21 | JeffM_ | yes that's what usualy happens but it is not required |
| 06:16.45 | JeffM_ | but the plugin does not have to be GPL |
| 06:17.04 | alpha1-2 | version 3 neither? I read something about it I think... |
| 06:17.09 | JeffM_ | that is the main reason for the API abstraction to let them be licensed however the author wants |
| 06:17.28 | JeffM_ | v3 is dead but it has a similar API abstraction |
| 06:18.52 | alpha1-2 | ok, (dead?), then blast coded it but he doesn't released publically right? |
| 06:19.06 | alpha1-2 | didn't release* |
| 06:19.16 | JeffM_ | possibly, he would have to be asked |
| 06:19.42 | alpha1-2 | ok, have you checked about it already right? |
| 06:19.52 | JeffM_ | 2.4.0 was made because nobody was working on 3.0 |
| 06:21.04 | JeffM_ | I have no way to access blast007's thoughts |
| 06:21.08 | alpha1-2 | i don't understand, what is the relation between 2.4.0 and 3 GPL? |
| 06:21.09 | JeffM_ | so no I can not check it out |
| 06:21.31 | JeffM_ | ahh you meant GPL3, I tought you meant BZFlag V3 |
| 06:21.35 | JeffM_ | my mistake |
| 06:21.38 | alpha1-2 | oh ok |
| 06:21.40 | alpha1-2 | :) |
| 06:21.47 | JeffM_ | too many V3s |
| 06:21.51 | alpha1-2 | he he |
| 06:22.04 | JeffM_ | I don't belive we are using any V3 licenses |
| 06:22.15 | JeffM_ | but that would be up to bzflag's owner |
| 06:22.52 | alpha1-2 | ok, I mentioned that iirc v3 says soething like :"liberate/public the code", but I don't know well :) |
| 06:23.11 | JeffM_ | that is probably why we are not using it |
| 06:23.19 | alpha1-2 | like a contribution to GPL moevement let's say |
| 06:23.30 | alpha1-2 | movement*.... but no matter |
| 06:23.39 | JeffM_ | a license should be a legal document not a philosophy |
| 06:24.06 | alpha1-2 | ok, I promise read about it and I will comment you after :) |
| 06:24.33 | JeffM_ | we are using lgpl 2.1 |
| 06:24.36 | alpha1-2 | then, have you checked it, you said me yes before, in git? |
| 06:24.51 | alpha1-2 | branch? |
| 06:25.07 | alpha1-2 | [03:05] <JeffM_> it's not checked in |
| 06:25.08 | JeffM_ | I was guessing that he MAY have put it in a VCS not that I have not seen it |
| 06:25.18 | JeffM_ | I did not see it in our SVN |
| 06:25.21 | JeffM_ | that is all |
| 06:25.57 | alpha1-2 | VCS? |
| 06:26.03 | JeffM_ | Version Controll Systems |
| 06:26.14 | alpha1-2 | oh ok |
| 06:26.24 | alpha1-2 | too many acronyms |
| 06:27.04 | alpha1-2 | ok, where can I search for it? and what are the files for the "default" server bad language filter? |
| 06:27.13 | JeffM_ | nowhere |
| 06:27.29 | JeffM_ | the default one is built into bzfs |
| 06:27.41 | alpha1-2 | they were 2 questions in one sorry |
| 06:27.59 | alpha1-2 | in which file? |
| 06:28.14 | JeffM_ | I belive it is part of the normal chat filter |
| 06:28.18 | alpha1-2 | I didn't find any "language " file that would have sense |
| 06:28.27 | JeffM_ | it would be very eash to rebuild the plugin |
| 06:28.44 | JeffM_ | it would have the word chat and filter in it |
| 06:29.31 | alpha1-2 | oh you mean in the bzfs file, let me see..... |
| 06:29.59 | JeffM_ | really just make a new plugin, see if the unfiltered message dosn't match the filtered message and if it doesn't clear the filtered mesage |
| 06:30.14 | JeffM_ | it should be a 10 line plugin |
| 06:30.48 | alpha1-2 | oh no, I think that I have the built version (a lot of .o files) :P |
| 06:31.18 | JeffM_ | we do not ship .o files |
| 06:31.21 | alpha1-2 | do I have to clone the SVN right? |
| 06:31.30 | rob1n | why does the 64-bit bzflag installer want to put the installation in Program Files (x86)? |
| 06:31.31 | JeffM_ | you check it out not clone |
| 06:31.54 | JeffM_ | rob1n, because we never updated the installer correctly, we stopped shipping 64 bit |
| 06:32.01 | JeffM_ | there is no reason to build in 74 bit |
| 06:32.08 | JeffM_ | 64 bit even :) |
| 06:32.13 | rob1n | would it be better advised to just use the 32bit installer then? |
| 06:32.19 | JeffM_ | yeah |
| 06:33.38 | alpha1-2 | oh sorry i found them (bzfs) (I'm tired at this time :P) |
| 06:33.49 | khonkhortisan | Your numeral keys are in order. |
| 06:33.53 | JeffM_ | there is no speed benifit for the 64 bit version it just uses more ram |
| 06:34.11 | khonkhortisan | Mine are 7531902468 :) |
| 06:34.12 | alpha1-2 | I want to check out the bad word list for the moment :) |
| 06:37.16 | alpha1-2 | is there any index about the function of each cxx file? |
| 06:37.35 | JeffM_ | nope |
| 06:37.54 | JeffM_ | you should be able to search the code for things using a decent editor |
| 06:38.40 | alpha1-2 | wow 6000 lines :P |
| 06:46.42 | JeffM_ | hmm the installer is set to use the 64 bit program files if it's a 64 bit insaller. InstallDir "$PROGRAMFILES64\BZFlag${VER_MAJOR}${VER_MINOR}_${BITNESS}" |
| 06:54.55 | alpha1-2 | yeah "/* load the bad word filter if it was set */"! |
| 06:55.01 | alpha1-2 | :) |
| 06:55.27 | alpha1-2 | line 5847 :) |
| 06:55.39 | alpha1-2 | (I am fast :) |
| 06:55.46 | alpha1-2 | (joke) |
| 06:59.18 | alpha1-2 | 5487* |
| 07:02.40 | alpha1-2 | wow main of 1200 lines! |
| 07:03.10 | alpha1-2 | I like this! |
| 08:53.47 | *** join/#bzflag swigg_ (~swigg@68-119-228-196.dhcp.ahvl.nc.charter.com) |
| 09:14.34 | *** join/#bzflag swigg_ (~swigg@68-119-228-196.dhcp.ahvl.nc.charter.com) |
| 09:35.57 | *** join/#bzflag swigg_ (~swigg@68-119-228-196.dhcp.ahvl.nc.charter.com) |
| 11:19.07 | *** join/#bzflag swigg__ (~swigg@68-119-228-196.dhcp.ahvl.nc.charter.com) |
| 14:03.58 | *** join/#bzflag Rob5a (~Rob5a@5.28.126.102) |
| 15:45.24 | *** join/#bzflag ashvala (~ashvala@unaffiliated/ashvala) |
| 16:19.36 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM2501 (~Jeffery@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 16:19.37 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 16:19.37 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM2501 (~Jeffery@unaffiliated/jeffm2501) |
| 16:19.37 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v JeffM2501] by ChanServ |
| 16:19.37 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@unaffiliated/jeffm2501) |
| 16:19.37 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v JeffM] by ChanServ |
| 16:20.31 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 16:20.32 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@unaffiliated/jeffm2501) |
| 16:20.32 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v JeffM] by ChanServ |
| 16:37.00 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM_ (~JeffM@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 17:30.08 | short_circuit | ooOOOoooo.. I should see if I can make a Candy Crush Saga map for BZ XD |
| 17:37.21 | short_circuit | Just need to add an audio file to the clients that says 'Sweeeet' and a switch the map can flip to change from applause to 'Sweeeet' X~D!! |
| 17:37.39 | short_circuit | for a capture that is |
| 17:38.39 | JeffM | there is no way to do that |
| 17:38.42 | JeffM | sadly |
| 17:41.50 | short_circuit | Right? Sad indeed. The world is lessened by it ;) |
| 17:42.27 | short_circuit | [/end foolishness] |
| 17:46.19 | *** join/#bzflag ashvala (~ashvala@unaffiliated/ashvala) |
| 17:54.40 | short_circuit | Inspiration for this silly idea brought to you buy James May's Man Lab building a lego house. My speaking about Louman and his wonderful maps. The Lego map being thought of and those silly commercials on tv right now for CCS on facebook and stuff. Funny how the deranged mind works. |
| 18:09.55 | blast007 | JeffM: the plugin that alpha1-2 was looking for was made by L4m3r and was posted on the forum... |
| 18:10.06 | JeffM | ahh |
| 18:10.16 | blast007 | we only made a minor change to it for GU |
| 18:10.30 | JeffM | only your post showed up when I searched for the name he said |
| 18:10.36 | JeffM | I wasn't looking too hard into it |
| 18:10.40 | blast007 | (basically, sending the message back to the person who sent it so they knew what was filtered) |
| 18:24.06 | *** join/#bzflag ashvala (~ashvala@unaffiliated/ashvala) |
| 18:24.43 | JeffM | hooookay, don't ever upgrade your video driver while you have a virtual box VM running with acceleration, it gets PISSED :) |
| 18:35.41 | blast007 | hehehe |
| 18:35.59 | *** join/#bzflag ashvala (~ashvala@unaffiliated/ashvala) |
| 18:50.10 | short_circuit | o_O |
| 19:00.10 | Notify | 03BZFlag:bullet_catcher * 22772 trunk/bzflag/src/bzfs/WorldWeapons.cxx: Make a disposable copy of a FlagType object to preserve the const original when firing a world weapon. |
| 19:08.03 | Notify | 03BZFlag:bullet_catcher * 22773 (trunk/bzflag/src/bzfs/bzfs.cxx trunk/bzflag/src/bzfs/bzfs.h): Remove const from message data that will be modified.Use const_cast where it is, in fact, safe to modify const message data for rebroadcast. |
| 19:41.40 | *** join/#bzflag meeba (~lamer@c-75-71-180-64.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 20:35.21 | *** join/#bzflag ashvala (~ashvala@unaffiliated/ashvala) |
| 20:56.55 | *** join/#bzflag randomparticle (~randompar@about/essy/snick/randomparticle) |
| 21:01.21 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@cpe-76-167-236-199.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 21:01.22 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM (~Jeffery@unaffiliated/jeffm2501) |
| 21:01.22 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v JeffM] by ChanServ |
| 21:45.46 | *** join/#bzflag DTRemenak (~DTRemenak@76-227-151-154.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) |
| 21:45.46 | *** join/#bzflag DTRemenak (~DTRemenak@about/essy/CrazyCoder/DTRemenak) |
| 21:45.46 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v DTRemenak] by ChanServ |
| 22:22.43 | *** join/#bzflag tw1sted (~tw1sted@pool-74-101-150-159.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 22:33.36 | *** join/#bzflag unclelightning (~chatzilla@pool-64-222-241-185.port.east.myfairpoint.net) |